Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Lee Stinson spent 23 of his 44 years in jail. Freed yesterday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:01 AM
Original message
Robert Lee Stinson spent 23 of his 44 years in jail. Freed yesterday
Man Serving Life Sentence Freed 23 Years After Wrongful Murder Conviction
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,486126,00.html

MILWAUKEE — A man sentenced to life in prison for killing a woman in 1984 had his conviction overturned and was released Friday after spending 23 years behind bars.

Robert Lee Stinson, 44, of Milwaukee, walked out of the New Lisbon Correctional Institution in street clothes and hugged his sister and members of the Wisconsin Innocence Project. A judge vacated the sentence after the Project argued that bite-mark analysis and DNA evidence that didn't match evidence from the crime scene, defense attorney Byron Lichstein said.

Stinson still faces a charge of first-degree homicide related to the woman's death, Lichstein said. A status hearing is set for July 27, according to online court records. Stinson was released on a personal recognizance bond, meaning he must return to court.

--Okay stop me if you've heard something like THIS before--

At trial, two forensic odontologists testified that Stinson's teeth were a match, even though Stinson was apparently missing a tooth in a place where the bite marks indicated a tooth, Lichstein said.

Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm said in a statement Friday that Stinson's conviction was not wrongful, and that he was convicted based on "state-of-the-art scientific evidence available at the time of his trial."

Stinson's conviction was based almost exclusively on evidence suggesting that bite marks matched Stinson's teeth, Lichstein said. The lawyer said he did not know why special technology was necessary if the missing tooth could have indicated there was no match.

Steven Kohn, Stinson's trial attorney, said he didn't remember the details of the prosecution but recalled that the two state experts had discussed the case at a conference for forensic odontologists, leaving them unable to serve as defense witnesses. Kohn said he was forced to rely on an expert whose expertise was in dental records, not forensic odontology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Q: How can you tell if a DA is lying?
A: His/her lips are moving.

Assholes...:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norepubsin08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. All cops and DA's are scum
the world would be a better place with out them!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. that isn't true
lawlessness would not make a better world.

and there are good cops and good prosecutors. Like everything else, the bad ones get more coverage than the good ones.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep--everytime a vicious killer or rapist is put behind bars, you don't hear anyone striking up the
band. We only tend to make an issue of it when someone doesn't do the job they're supposed to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. The prosecution wasn't wrong ...
they weren't right, that's all. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. This bite mark "evidence" send more than one person
to prison, only to be later exonerated by DNA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Compare the bite marks to Ted Bundy.
Ted bit all of his victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You would think that after reading this, someone should figure out
bite marks evidence isn't exactly reliable. But apparently not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC