Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Quietly Subpoenaed Harriet Miers, But She Refused to Comply

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:12 PM
Original message
Congress Quietly Subpoenaed Harriet Miers, But She Refused to Comply


http://www.pubrecord.org/politics/653-congress-quietly-subpoenaed-harriet-miers-but-she-refused-to-comply.html


The House Judiciary Committee quietly subpoenaed former White House Counsel Harriet Miers three weeks ago demanding that she provide testimony about her role in the firings of nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006.

According to a letter sent to Elliot Mincberg, chief counsel of oversight and investigations for the Judiciary Committee, by Miers' attorney the Judiciary Committee subpoenaed Miers on Jan. 9. She was asked to provide a deposition to the panel on Jan. 16. She did not comply with the subpoena and Conyers' committee did not state publicly that he sought her testimony earlier this month.

Miers’ attorney, George Manning, wrote to Mincberg Jan. 15, and enclosed a copy of a Jan. 15, letter drafted by former White House Counsel Fred Fielding which said Miers had “absolute immunity.”
-snip-
---------------------------------


another 'absolute immunity'


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. what immunity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think we may see this nonsense hitting the fan pretty soon.
At last I certainly hope that we do. Both Miers and Rove should be held in contempt of Congress.

Obama's a constitutional scholar so surely he must realize the importance of enforcing these subpoenas.

I'm not placing any bets on what happens next, it's entirely possible that they'll walk away untouched. If they do then that sets a very bad precedent and undermines the rule of law, at least as it applies to the executive branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Its going to court before anything substantive happens
Rove's lawyer is working with Congress (agreement on service etc) Hers may not be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Absolute imminity"???
Who do these people think they are? Kings and queens? There's no such thing as absolute immunity in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. They need to get that jail in the Capitol ready
Congress needs to ready up that jail in the U.S. Capitol ready to go. They should put people in there if they get stubborn about answering questions of the Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Fuck that, throw their asses in the Central Detention Facility (D.C. jail).
Let them step around puke, piss, and shit for a few hours while warding off the occasional deranged tweaker. Then ask them again if they wish to honor the terms of their subpoena.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Would that place be under the jurisdiction of the Congress?
The Capitol jail cells would be, not sure about the DC Jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I hope they share a cell where thay can talk about their mutual love for George W
and what a wonderful man he was. And how he will come to save them.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. It just makes me want to puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Quietly?" Do it LOUDLY. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. YES
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Do they actually think Bush's boys are still on the job?
Let's see if those subpoenas has any teeth or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bush was still President then
They need to try it now. Or they are waiting to see what happens with Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. What really pisses me off about this...
...is that they are allowed to not even show up, without consequences.

Because even if you can claim immunity, the immunity pertains to certain questions, not to every last thing you did while you were an official. That is long established precedent.

Yet the so-called conservative, so-called strict constructionist, so-called traditionalist types see nothing wrong with asserting a brand new privilege that allows people who are subpoenaed to simply not show up at all.

And worse yet, those who are doing the subpoenaeing are somehow not showing up on all the talk shows and expressing their absolute and utter OUTRAGE at this miscarriage of justice.

We have created a ruling class that believes they can make the rules as they go along, and who are willing to play patty cake with each other while the masses suffer under an increasingly draconian police state situation. Just let you or me defy a subpoena, stating that we take the 5th on everything so we don't have to answer individual questions. See how far that gets us.

I'm at the point where I don't want to play anymore. One set of rules for them, one set for you and me. Our new Treasury Secretary didn't pay required taxes because he "didn't know" he had to. Yeah, right, that inspires confidence. Daschle, apparently, just didn't feel like paying taxes on 150,000+ of benefits given to him by a corporation -- until it became inconvenient to ignore the tax codes. But these people, instead of having the book thrown at them, just buy their way out and worse, are nominated to high office. Because they're in the club. The rest of us can just suck on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's Obama's turn to do what is morally right and obey our Constitution. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. What a great idea!! I hereby declare that I, jgraz, have ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
Now excuse me while I go rob a bank.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. They should put her on the Do Not Travel list...
allowing only travel to DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. revoke her law license, driver's license and
freeze the bank accounts.

Offer her a ride to the hearing room where they can "straighten it all out".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'll take some of that "absolute immunity". I have some "policy differences"
with the legal system. Seems their policy is - what I want to do is illegal and my policy is it isn't illegal if my lawyer says it isn't illegal.

Stop me if this sounds familiar...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. Cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC