|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Cronopio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 02:46 AM Original message |
Bart Simpson used by Nancy Cartwright to promote Scientology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 02:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. Well that's right shitty of her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 02:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. I'd heard that, but didn't know the context. that's pretty bizarre of her, but well, you can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
3. It's a unique voice, but I'm betting they could find someone else to do it if they had to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherish44 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
4. The Simpsons have made fun of just about every religion except Scientology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 03:04 AM Response to Original message |
5. "Why you little..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 04:00 AM Response to Original message |
6. She has earned the right to work someplace else. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 04:41 AM Response to Original message |
7. Well what are they going to do? Fire her and ruin one of their biggest cash cows? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 04:53 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. FOX can sue Cartright for copyright infringment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:15 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yeah but do they want to alienate one of their major stars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 07:42 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. She isn't a "star." I doubt that most Simpsons fans even know who she is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Simpson fans do know who she is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. I think they'll try their best to be amicable towards eachother. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I don't see how it's win-win, unless the cult backs down and pays FOX. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheTimmer (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. Angela Cartwright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetpotato (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 06:15 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. Angela Cartwright was on Make Room for Daddy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheTimmer (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 02:00 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I'm not sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Alienate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 04:51 AM Response to Original message |
8. I wonder if FOX will sue the cult? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 04:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I'll root for Matt. (plus, it ain't fox news) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. I don't know if Groening owns the copyright or if it's FOX's. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. FOX are the enforcers. I remember about ten years ago they came down hard on fansites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. There's a big rooting interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. As long as the cult doesn't have them on retainer. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adenoid_Hynkel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:33 AM Response to Original message |
12. Maybe they'll sue, she'll walk and they'll finally give the show the mercy killing it deserves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Agreed about when it started to take a dump. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 06:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. One would hope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
23. Bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-09 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
26. compared to the Scientologists fake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC