Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“Impeach for Peace” – A Plan for Citizen Action to Incite Congress to Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 09:28 PM
Original message
“Impeach for Peace” – A Plan for Citizen Action to Incite Congress to Act
The perils presented by the president’s surveillance programs pale in comparison with the broader threat from his theory of unlimited power, which assaults the rule of law itself – Joe W. Pitts


Never in the history of our nation have we been so in need of impeaching and removing from office a President and Vice President of the United States. Yet Congress seems very reluctant to pursue such a course of action. Since Congress, especially Democrats in Congress, must recognize the vast array of crimes against our Constitution committed by the Bush administration; and since they must recognize that failure to impeach these criminals will set a precedent for our nation which implies that crimes against our Constitution are not really serious offenses; it must therefore be fear of possible political repercussions that prevent our Congress from taking the action that they know should be taken in order to show the world and ourselves that we are a Constitutional democracy after all.

That being the case, perhaps a show of massive support for impeachment from the American citizenry is required to exert the pressure on Congress that will compel them to act. “Impeach for Peace” is an organization devoted to showing American citizens what we can do to promote that process:

Impeach for Peace, a Minnesota-based impeachment group, has researched a method for impeaching the president using a little known and rarely used part of the Rules of the House of Representatives ("Jefferson’s Manual"). This document actually empowers individual citizens to initiate the impeachment process themselves.

"Jefferson's Manual" is an interpretive guide to parliamentary procedure, and is included (along with the Constitution) in the bound volumes of the Rules of the House of Representatives. It is ratified by each congress (including the current one), and has been updated continuously through the history of our democracy. The section covering impeachment lists the acceptable vehicles for bringing impeachment motions to the floor of the House.

Before the House Judiciary Committee can put together the Articles of Impeachment, someone must initiate the impeachment procedure. Most often, this occurs when members of the House pass a resolution. Another method outlined in the manual, however, is for individual citizens to submit a memorial for impeachment…. Any citizen can download the “Do it Yourself ” (DIY) Impeachment Memorial and submit it, making it possible for Americans to do what our representatives have been unwilling to do. The idea is for so many people to submit the Memorial that it cannot be ignored. We hope to flood the congress with sacks of mail to further pressure them to act on the memorials. Please demand accountability and ensure the strength of the impeachment movement.

Just go to THIS SITE to obtain everything you need for submitting a petition to your Congressional Representative. It includes a printable petition, cover letter, a printable petition, and directions for filling them out.

The petition requests impeachment on the basis of: lying to the American public and Congress in order justify an illegal war; illegal warrantless spying on American citizens; torture of prisoners in violation of international and U.S. law; and stripping Americans of their Constitutional rights by ordering the indefinite detention of citizens without charges or opportunity to defend themselves, etc. The petition concludes:

In all of this George Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President, subversive of Constitutional government to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice, and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States….

Wherefore and inasmuch as said George W. Bush has violated the most sacred and undoubted rights of the inhabitants of these United States, your petitioner prays that the conduct and proceedings in this behalf, of said George W. Bush, may be inquired into by your honorable body, and such decision made therein to impeach…. and to inform the Senate of these facts by resolution (Manual Sec. 607; Deschler Ch 14 Sec. 9) for trial and removal from office ….

Impeach for Peace also asks us:

We need leaders. Ask yourself if you're willing to put in the time to help make this happen. No hiearchy, no egos. Our organization is proud of the fact that anybody who has the desire can step up and make things happen. There are a few of us who started things initially, but we're all in agreement that this movement must be democratic, and open to all. Anyone who wants to step up and make this happen, is free to. We'll provide you any resources to which we have access to help make your dreams of Bush-Free America come true.

We do need your help. This can't happen without people stepping up to demand Bush step down. Please contact us, come to a meeting (info on the website), and become a player in this movement. We have plenty of projects which are as-of-yet undone. Which one of you would like to head up the project to get the Minnesota Legislature to pass an impeachment resolution? We know how, and can provide you the resources necessary.


A warning as to the danger of our current situation by The Washington Spectator

I have voiced the opinion many times that failure to remove Bush and Cheney from office will set a terrible precedent and very possibly hasten the slide of our nation towards tyranny. Here I’ll conclude with some prescient words from the March issue of The Washington Spectator, from the end of an article by Joe W. Pitts, where he explains why the Bush administration’s illegal domestic spying program has not ended just because it says it has:

The perils presented by the president’s surveillance programs pale in comparison with the broader threat from his theory of unlimited power, which assaults the rule of law itself (as evident in everything from his “signing statements,” by means of which he reserves the right to ignore laws he dislikes; to his detention policies; to the suspension of habeas corpus; and threats to prosecute the free press for reporting on all of these programs). Stephen Colbert recently joked that in a war without limits, the president’s power should be unlimited. But the rest of us should be concerned that it’s already unlimited if the president can ignore laws like FISA that were passed to stop precisely these sorts of abuses historically arising from unchecked power….

Excesses like the TSP surveillance not only betray our values, but tend to produce negative practical consequences: insecurity and fear rather than security. Those who ask what harm this can cause if you’re innocent might want to recall the many innocent people whose privacy and free expression have already been violated: the U.S. citizens and foreigners rounded up and mistreated after 9/11; those wrongly locked up in Guantanamo Bay and a network of secret detention facilities; the peace activists who have been harassed, spied on, and blocked by “no-fly” lists; and America’s general slide toward being one of those fearful surveillance societies we’ve always thought could not be more different from us….

The new Congress has thus far not lived up to its promise to address these and other civl liberties and human rights violations and, where necessary, reassert the rule of law. It took grassroots pressure to defeat the president’s attempt to legalize these programs during the recent lame-duck session, and it will take grassroots pressure on the new Congress to achieve real reform. Congress must call immediate and comprehensive hearings both to stop this illicit surveillance and to hold accountable those who have ordered it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick and Rec for people-power! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. The reason that they call themselves "Impeach for Peace"
is that they believe -- and I agree with them -- that the only way (or certainly the best way) to end the Iraq War any time soon, AND the only way to decrease the likelihood of our country nuking Iran is to impeach.

George Bush will never put his arrogance behind him enough to submit to the will of Congress or the American people. Nor does he care how many people have to die in order to support his stupid wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rebuttals to several arguments against impeachment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. George Bush, profound statement on his philosophy of war and peace:
"I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace."

George W. Bush, June 18, 2002

http://www.studentsfororwell.org/yarr/warispeace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick for the effort to rid ourselves of the worst tyrants ever to rule our country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Jefferson's Manual -- Guide to impeachment
Here is an explantion, from the "Impeach for Peace" website, of the relevant portion of Jefferson's Manual:

In the House of Representatives there are various methods of setting an impeachment in motion: by charges made on the floor on the responsibility of a Member or Delegate (II, 1303; III, 2342, 2400, 2469; VI, 525, 526, 528, 535, 536); by charges preferred by a memorial, which is usually referred to a committee for examination (III, 2364, 2491, 2494, 2496, 2499, 2515; VI, 552); or by a resolution dropped in the hopper by a Member and referred to a committee (April 15, 1970, p. 11941-2); by a message from the President (III, 2294, 2319; VI, 498); by charges transmitted from the legislature of a State (III, 2469) or Territory (III, 2487) or from a grand jury (III, 2488); or from facts developed and reported by an investigating committee of the House (III, 2399, 2444).

The bolded portion of this description is what "Impeach for Peace" is asking from us.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. The "politician" never is the advocate for social justice...
-- the people -- have to demand it, then the politician will unwillingly make the change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think you got that right for the most part
Though there are some exceptions.

And sometimes they will willingly make the change, but they will do so only if the people make it clear that it will not be to their political detriment to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sorry this is too old to recommend!
All the splitting, spitting and tearing of clothing in meaningless divisive bills will never accomplish what this would. Answers are more simplistic than people realize. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC