Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judd Gregg Voted to Kill Commerce Dept. Before He Agreed to Lead It

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:52 PM
Original message
Judd Gregg Voted to Kill Commerce Dept. Before He Agreed to Lead It
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 10:17 PM by bigtree
President Obama’s candidate to run the Commerce Department voted in favor of abolishing the agency as a member of the Budget Committee and on the Senate floor in 1995.

Sen. Judd Gregg , R-N.H., whose nomination was expected to be announced Tuesday, also worked in the Senate to trim the department’s budget as head of the Commerce-Justice-Science Appropriations Subcommittee.


Ultimately, the Commerce Department survived, and Gregg has since shown more interest than most of his Republican colleagues in funding some of its agencies, particularly the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Gregg also fought President Bill Clinton’s efforts to increase funding for the Commerce Department to administer the 2000 census. Indeed, Gregg’s commitment to basic functions of the department has been questioned at times.

“He was generally pretty harsh on them and not really interested in their programs, especially the commerce side of things,” said a Democratic appropriations aide.


http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003022841
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like another John Bolton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Agreed
Sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. that worked out well
. . . didn't it? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wouldn't it be ironic if....
Gregg took the job, and then Obama eliminated COmmerce and created a new department to take its place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or he fired his new Commerce Secretary?

Usually Obama is three steps ahead of the game
but this pick baffles me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't usualy x-post myself, but here's my theory
<<In theory, you appear bi-partisan while, in practice, making it much easier to get work done in the Senate. In practice, if he wanted 60 votes so badly, he should have dragged his (admittedly exhausted) butt down to Hotlanta and campaigned like Hell, in person for Jim Martin. >>

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=4966993&mesg_id=4966993


The problem is that, even by doing this, he's still not guaranteed 60. Franken may lose in court and Lieberman may bolt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Doubt he'll get his 60 even with Gregg
Word in NH is Gregg won't take it unless Lynch (the Gov) agrees to appoint an Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC