|
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 12:09 AM by seafan
With a grand tip of the hat to this blog, for this great find.
Confirmation of specific details about a portion of the direct involvement of White House Counsel (Harriet Miers) AND the WH Office of Political Affairs (Karl Rove) is in the information below.
(Bolding and underlining added) Documents: How to fire a U.S. AttorneyThe "Plan for Replacing Certain United States Attorneys" lays out a step-by-step procedure for firing these "underperforming" attorneys. Page 2 of the document is especially interesting.] Abbreviations used in the documents AG: Attorney General AGAC: Attorney General's Advisory Committee DOJ: Department of Justice EOUSA: Executive Office for United States Attorneys OAG: Office of the Attorney General ODAG: Office of the Deputy Attorney General USAs: U.S. Attorneys USATXW: U.S. Attorney, Texas WHCO: White House Counsel WH OPA: White House Office of Political Affairs
Mercer, William W From: Sampson, Kyle Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:51 PM To: Mercer, William W Subject: Heads up Attachments: USA replacement plan.doc
Administration has determined to ask some underperforming USAs to move on (you'll remember I beat back a much broader — like across the board — plan that WHCO was pushing after 2004). Calls will go out on Thursday. Wanted you to know in case you get some calls from the field and so you can help manage the chatter that may result. See the attached for details.
PLAN FOR REPLACING CERTAIN UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
STEP 1
Senator calls: On December 7, the following Republican home-state Senators or, where there is no Republican home-state Senator, the home-state "Bush political lead" are contacted:
* AG calls Jon Kyl (re Charlton) * WHCO calls John Ensign (re Bogden) * WHCO calls Pete Domenici (re Iglesias) * WH OPA calls California political lead (re Lam and Ryan) * WH OPA calls Michigan political lead (re Chiara) * WH OPA calls Washington political lead (re McKay)
AG/WHCO/WH OPA inform the Senators/Bush political leads as follows:
* The administration has determined to give someone else the opportunity to serve as U.S. Attorney in for the final two years of the Administration. * has been informed of this determination and knows that we intend to have a new Acting or Interim U.S. Attorney in place by January 31, 2007. * We will look to you, Senator/Bush political lead, to recommend candidates that we should consider for appointment as the new U.S. Attorney. As always, we ask that you recommend at least three candidates for the President's consideration. Importantly, we ask that you make recommendations as soon as possible.
STEP 2
U.S. Attorney calls: On December 7 (very important that Senator calls and U.S. Attorney calls happen simultaneously), Mike Battle contacts the following U.S. Attorneys:
* Paul Charlton (D. Ariz.) * Carol Lam (S.D. Cal.) * Kevin Ryan (N.D. Cal.) * Margaret Chiara (W.D. Mich.) * Dan Bogden (D. Nev.) * David Iglesias (D.N.M.) * John McKay (W.D. Wash.)
Battle informs the U.S. Attorneys as follows:
* What are you plans with regard to continued service as U.S. Attorney? * The Administration is grateful for your service as U.S. Attorney, but has determined to give someone else the opportunity to serve as U.S. Attorney in your district for the final two years of the Administration. * We will work with you to make sure that there is a smooth transition, but intend to have a new Acting or Interim U.S. Attorney in place by January 31, 2007.
STEP 3
Prepare to Withstand Political Upheaval: U.S. Attorneys desiring to save their jobs (aided by their allies in the political arena as well as the Justice Department community), likely will make efforts to preserve themselves in office. We should expect these efforts to be strenuous. Direct and indirect appears of the Administration's determination to seek these resignations likely will be directed at: various White House offices, includiong the Office of the Counsel to the President and the Office of Political Affairs; Attorney General Gonzales and DOJ Chief of Staff Sampson; Deputy Attorney General McNulty and ODAG staffers Moschella and Elston; Acting Associate AG Bill Mercer; EOUSA Director Mike Battle; and AGAC Chair Johnny Sutton. Recipients of such "appeals" must respond identically:
* What? U.S. Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President (there is no right, nor should there be any expectation, that U.S. Attorneys would be entitled to serve beyond their four-year term). * Who decided? The Administration made the determination to seek the resignations (not any specific person at the White House or the Department of Justice). * Why me? The Administration is grateful for your service, but wants to give someone else the chance to serve in your district. * I need more time! The decision is to have a new Acting or Interim U.S. Attorney in place by January 31, 2007 (granting "extensions" will hinder the process of getting a new U.S. Attorney in place and giving that person the opportunity to serve for a full two years).
STEP 4
Evaluation and Selection of "Interim" Candidates: During December 2006-January 2007, the Department of Justice, in consultation with the Office of the Counsel to the President, evaluates and selects candidates for Attorney General-appointment (or candidates who may become Acting U.S. Attorney by operation of law) to serve upon the resignation of above-listed U.S. Attorneys.
STEP 5
Selection, Nomination, and Appointment of New U.S. Attorneys: Beginning as soon as possible in November 2006, Office of the Counsel to the President and Department of Justice carry out (on an expedited basis) the regular U.S. Attorney appointment process: obtain recommendations from Senators/Bush political leads and other sources; evaluate candidates; make recommendations to the President; conduct background investigations; have President make nominations and work to secure confirmations of U.S. Attorney nominees.
Mercer, William W From: Sampson, Kyle Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:06 PM To: Mercer, William W Subject: RE: Heads up
All Senators have been notified and are fine/no objections. All USAs have been notified, except Iglesias and Chiara (Battle has left messages for them). Who is calling you? Charlton? McKay?
---------Original Message---------- From: Mercer, William W Sent: thursday, December 07, 2006 1:58 PM To: Sampson, Kyle Subject: Re: Heads up
I have what I assume is my first call. Before I respond, do you have a status report?
---------Original Message---------- From: Sampson, Kyle To: Mercer, William W Sent: Tue Dec 05 22:50:48 2006 Subject Heads up
Administration has determined to ask some underperforming USAs to move on (you'll remember I beat back a much broader -- like across the board -- plan that WHCO was pushing after 2004). Calls will go out on Thursday. Wanted you to know in case you get some calls from the field and so you can help manage the chatter that may result. See the attached for the details.
<<USA replacement plan.doc>>
Mercer, William W From: Mercer, William W Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:41 PM To: Sampson, Kyle Subject: Re: Heads up
Charlton
---------Original Message---------- From: Sampson, Kyle To: Mercer, William W Sent: Thu Dec 07 15:05:31 2006 Subject: RE: Heads up
All Senators have been notified and are fine/no objections. All USAs have been notified, except Iglesias and Chiara (Battle has left messages for them). Who is calling you? Charlton? McKay?
---------Original Message---------- From: Mercer, William W Sent: thursday, December 07, 2006 1:58 PM To: Sampson, Kyle Subject: Re: Heads up
I have what I assume is my first call. Before I respond, do you have a status report?
---------Original Message---------- From: Sampson, Kyle To: Mercer, William W Sent: Tue Dec 05 22:50:48 2006 Subject Heads up
Administration has determined to ask some underperforming USAs to move on (you'll remember I beat back a much broader -- like across the board -- plan that WHCO was pushing after 2004). Calls will go out on Thursday. Wanted you to know in case you get some calls from the field and so you can help manage the chatter that may result. See the attached for the details.
<<USA replacement plan.doc>>
From: Sampson, Kyle Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:25 PM To: Battle, Michael (USAEO) Cc: McNulty, Paul J; Elston, Michael (ODAG); Moschella, William; Mercer, William W; Gooding, Monica; Sutton Johnny K. (USATXW) Subject: USA replacements
Mike, Bill Kelley called to report that they are weathering two main complaints: In making the calls, Battle (1) wasn't clear whether the USAs in question would be permitted to resign, or instead were being fired; and (2) was too abrupt. Bill seemed nonplussed by the complaints, but nevertheless passed them on to me.
Perhaps a second round of calls from you, Mike, to the relevant USAs is in order? Talkers would be something like:
* I wanted to be sure you understood that DOJ intends not to say anything about your leaving, but instead allow you to announce your resignation and the reasons for it. * We want to work with you over the next six weeks to ensure a smooth transition; and * It's in our interest for you to land on your feet and maintain our good relations with the Department — how can I help?
Perhaps this is a bad idea? Thoughts?
Kyle Sampson Chief of Staff U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 (202) 514-2001 wk. (202) 305-5289 cell kyle.sampson@usdoj.gov
|