|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:37 AM Original message |
Please tell me why Judd Gregg is being appointed? Is he the best qualified? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
1. Da Juddhead - it's a Granite State of Mind (smirk) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
2. To loosen a GOP chink in the Senate for a future election. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:49 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Gregg was sure to lose in 2010. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:49 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Hopefully, a reason will be found for Obama to fire him sometime soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Why? Obama has a built-in GOP scapegoat with Gregg. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:54 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Point taken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 10:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. You're kidding, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 06:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Because Gregg made the deal, and obviously Lynch and Obama have no problem with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
5. Cabinet appointments are 100% politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:57 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I think there is a small flaw here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 10:00 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. That sentence was not really central to my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 10:03 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Gotcha .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
7. No better man could be found on earth. Sound familiar? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
13. Inside the tent pissing out.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 10:51 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. So far inside the tent that he's pissing on our heads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
16. (1) harmless outreach (2) makes Obama look bipartisan (3) pushes GOP senators further right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
17. yet another Obama olive branch to conservatives, now if he would do the same with progressives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC