Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT, PAGE ONE: An accumulating body of evidence is at odds with statements of Atty. General Gonzales

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 01:16 AM
Original message
NYT, PAGE ONE: An accumulating body of evidence is at odds with statements of Atty. General Gonzales
For Gonzales, More Records, and Questions
By ERIC LIPTON and DAVID JOHNSTON
Published: March 25, 2007

WASHINGTON, March 24 — An accumulating body of evidence is at odds with the statements of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales that he played little role in the deliberations over the dismissal of eight United States attorneys.

Mr. Gonzales has said he did not take part in any discussions of the dismissal effort, and left the planning and execution of the removals up to D. Kyle Sampson, his former chief of staff.

But e-mail messages and other documents released by the Justice Department in recent days suggest that Mr. Gonzales was told of the dismissal plan on at least two occasions, in 2005 when the plan was devised and again in late 2006 shortly before the firings were carried out.

The conflicts between the documentary record and Mr. Gonzales’s version of events have contributed to an erosion of support for him in Congress, where lawmakers from both parties have called for him to step down. They have also fed suspicions by some Democrats that the ousters, from the start, may have been orchestrated by the White House, and most particularly, by Karl Rove, the White House political adviser.

The disparities are giving Democrats in Congress a rationale to transform what started as an inquiry focused on the ouster plan itself into a much broader and perhaps even more damaging look at misleading, or at least inaccurate, statements by the Bush administration figures involved in the effort....

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/washington/25attorneys.html?ref=todayspaper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. I took a look at the local paper tonight.
THREE separate calls for impeachment! People are pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is what will drive the calls for impeachment
war will not do it, but this is relatively simple for people to udnerstand

Compromise the department of justice, and the justice system, period
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. right....
bbut notjing beats a Democratic president getting a BJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
33.  But was any crime committed over these firings
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 12:45 PM by barb162
What was the federal statute that was broken? It's an "At will" kind of employment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. KNR. ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Gonzales and republicon cronies lying to the American People
Toss the republicon liars out of Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. the NYTs is having an awful time saying the L word
THE WORD IS LIE!!!!!! You can say it. It came out easily enough during zippergate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Some of Gonzo's statements were to Congress. The word then is PERJURE.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's clear that this was a mid-term election strategy to attack Dems in key districts.
There's no other explanation, considering the timing and the 'litmus test.' When the handwriting was on the wall that the GOP was going to lose control of the House, Rove lit backfires to protect the seats (asses) getting burnt by corruption and tried to redirect US Attorneys to smear challengers.

This is far worse even than Nixon's use of the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yup
No doubt about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. And think of the majority the democrats would have won IF...
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 12:22 PM by Hubert Flottz
the GOP's cronies who did play along, hadn't conspired with Rove, Bush and Gonzo's grand plan to steal our votes again last November.

What if everyone in America just started lying to the folks they work for, 24/7, about everything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
19jet54 Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Disrespecting the people...
... "Wag the Dog" because he is in charge (The Decider) and to hell with the people? :sarcasm:

Everything about "W" and his cronies is about Disrespecting the people, "Congress is not going to tell him anything", all the advise on Iraq & he chooses SURGE, his attitude about 'entitlement', VA funding, Postal Reform, Medicare, Social Security? This president is disrespectful to the American People - He stole the first election by crook; he thinks he is above the law; America is sick & tired of King George - Read the Declaration of Independence, it applies today as much as it did 250 years ago...

:grr:

K&R - Nixon was a saint next to "W"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. He stole the 2004 election too--if you
have ever studied statistics its real obvious. When almost every difference of the "actual" vote count from the exit polls went in Georgies favor you know you had a bogus election. In an honest election the deviance from the exit polls would have gone equally to both candidates.
Exit poll discrepancies also made it ovious they were stealing congressional elections in 02 and 04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. I think you're probably right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. And I Can Almost GUARANTEE The Leaked Documents Will Keep Coming
And the hearings will uncover a LOT more perfidy. *Snicker*

The WH is in for one of the most vicious political beatings that's ever been witnessed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Were the latest documents leaked?
I'm having a hard time understanding why the crooks are releasing the e-mails. Could they really have thought we couldn't find enough people to read them? Given their "we can do whatever we damned well please" attitude, I don't understand why they gave out incriminating evidence. :shrug:

Any insights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I think that was precipitated by the announcement
that Kyle Sampson was going willingly under oath. They knew he would disclose them. There are some soiled undies over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Interesting
I love the image of soiled undies. :)

Unfortunately, I'll be in the hospital for knee surgery on Thursday and won't get to watch CSPAN. I'll have my radio, though, and can listen to AAR. I only wish my local affiliate played Randi instead of Schultz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Actually, No
I guess they weren't. They WERE released. Yeah, that's a good question. Why are they releasing this stuff? There must be some really good stuff they're holding back if they're releasing this stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Balto Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. "They" aren't doing it
This is about career prosecutors who don't like the politicization of the Justice Department and are releasing these documents *despite* the attempts of Gonzalies to cover them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. I certainly hope you are right. I am still angry at what they did to the Big Dog
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 01:56 PM by wake.up.america
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
30. Nah, it's just sometimes when the "truth" sets you free...
there's very little left if the majority of your life has been a lie.

Telling the truth about these absurdities doesn't make the tellers absurd, unless of course one listens to Rush. Then it's "backwards world".

There's a good reason not to let ourselves even think this is a political beating, because it's simple justice, not political brutality. These neo-punks just can't take having to pay for their own crimes because they keep up the scape goat game to save their own hides.

People going to court, having to tell the truth and have the truth be told about them shouldn't be pitied or reviled. They should just be dealt with like week old garbage. Take them out and let them sit together somewhere and rot away until all that is left turns into something useful again.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. You know the president of Poland is doing the same type of
purge bush is doing. He is an ally of bush and is also at an upper 20's approval rating.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Well, watch for election fraud initiatives in those
districts with new prosecutors, something along the lines of this:

New U.S. attorneys seem to have partisan records
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2779726

ROVE IDENTIFIED 11 PIVOTAL STATES FOR '08; BUSH HAS APPOINTED NEW U.S. ATTORNEYS IN NINE OF THEM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x491130

Justice's new U.S. attorneys have partisan records (Dem vote suppression experience!)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2779325

BUSH Appointed Attorney Accused Of Participating In Florida 04-Dem Voter Suppression (McClatchy)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x487446
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. I'm waiting for them to reopen WhiteWater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Would be nice.
Ohio sure has gotten some of their spunk back after booting out Ken Blackwell.

Bump the cronies off the evidence piles they are sitting on and INVESTIGATE what we find.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. Still no mention about WHY they wanted to replace the
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 02:02 PM by senseandsensibility
attorneys. Nothing about stopping investigations into repuglican criminals or installing their buddies into key states before the 2008 elections. The corporate media is so slow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. Shocking!
:rofl:

If anyone needs to keep their lawyers happy, you'd think it'd be the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. The great thing about this story ...even a wing-nut can understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Translation: He lied.
Impeach. What does it take to get articles of impeachment drafted for the lot of these thugs?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoVet Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. And I love this quote:
“Members of Congress now face a choice: whether they will waste time and provoke an unnecessary confrontation, or whether they will join us in working to do the people’s business,” Mr. Bush said.

Waste time and provoke an unnecessary confrontation? You mean, like impeaching Bill Clinton for lying about a blowjob?

And since when did any republican care about the "people's business" anyway?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. At odds with the evidence, not at all surprising given that Alberto Gonzales lied
...about everything he was asked regarding the Federal Attorney firings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sbyte Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. When is he due back before the judisiary Committee?
Bring it on. I want to seem him squirm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
32. This is unfolding like an old circus tent - just keeps getting bigger and bigger....
getting Gonzo under oath will open a myriad of lines of questioning that are available because of what the various fired US Attorney's were working on or had not pursued - election fraud, Cunningham co-horts, politicizing the justice dept, etc - whoopee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. "...is at odds with...." Interesting semantics to avoid saying, "Evidence shows Gonzales lied."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Balto Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. It's in their genes
These folks appear to be constitutionally incapable of telling the truth. How else to explain behaviour that was guaranteed to be uncovered and identified as just so many more lies? Why do that to yourself unless you just *cannot* do otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC