Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bonnie Newman - REPUBLICAN - named to fill Gregg's seat.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:55 PM
Original message
Bonnie Newman - REPUBLICAN - named to fill Gregg's seat.
I don't give a fucking rats ass if she sez she's not going to run.

I can't believe this was not a quid pro quo.

Does the average NH voter like this?

Fuck this fuck this fuck this fuck this.

C'mon ..... tell me how I'm wrong ...... I know you can do it .......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. No talking down here...
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 04:57 PM by Taverner
This is fucked up

The cheerleader, however, is hot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's public knowledge that there was quid pro quo here.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/02/03/cabinet_deal_is_set_for_gregg/

As for her running, who cares? She's way more vulnerable in 2010 than even Gregg would have been, and he was going to have a hard time of it. At this point, assuming NH Dems find a decent replacement, this seats a gimme pickup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Don't we impeach governors for quid pro quos vis a vis senate appointments?
Yeah ... I know ....... different facts.

What the fuck ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. way different facts.
Nobody's getting paid here.

I don't like it necessarily, but it's not illegal. And besides which, as I stated, Newman's toast in two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ms. Newman:


http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=J.+Bonnie+Newman+called+tough%2c+smart&articleId=00cb6bc0-296c-451a-922f-f3af098a769c&loc=interstitialskip

Newman, 63, was Sen. Judd Gregg's chief of staff when he was in the U.S. House in the 1980s. She has a long resume in the private and public sectors, highlighted by her roles as assistant to the President for management and administration in the George H.W. Bush White House, an assistant commerce secretary in the Reagan administration, interim president of the University of New Hampshire and executive dean at the Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.

More at the link above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. She was also one of Gov. Lynch's first supporters among NH Republicans. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, apparently the "average NH voter"
voted for Gregg, a Republican. So possibly choosing another Republican is a nod in that direction. Sure, we all would have liked a Dem there, but would the average NH voter have liked that? I kind of doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yeah, in 2004. But that ignores the 2006 and 2008 election cycles...
which saw NH go from almost entirely red to almost entirely blue. While I don't think there's anything wrong, legally or even ethically, with what happened here, I do think that Newman doesn't necessarily reflect the current outlook of the NH voter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Still, I think they should get that chance themselves in 2010
and not have one person make the decision for them. It just seems more ethical, somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I don't necessarily disagree, and I think Newman's toast in 2010 anyway. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. The "average voter" in NH recently threw out a Repub Senator and
2 Repub Congressmen and made the Statehouse Democratic controlled for the first time in 100 years. There has been a sea change up here since 2000 mostly thanks to GWB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. I am of the opinion that having Governors appoint senate replacements
Should be done away with. Let the people decide and then there won't be any questions of corruption or cronyism. As Blogo said, this is a valuable thing here and something that shouldn't be just given away. Something was traded here but we will never know what..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lynch wants the seat. I've got to believe he has a promise or
he knows she's a no go in 2010. Paul Hodes is the one who's got to be pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherish44 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gregg isn't in yet you know
I mean I doubt Dems would vote against Obama but maybe some of them are feeling a little Mavericky about nomination...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. And?
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 05:06 PM by gcomeau
Republican leaves, Republican replaces them. Is the average voter who voted FOR the Republican in the first place going to have a problem with it? My guess would be... no. What would make you think they would have a problem with it? Try to keep a sense of perspective, the population of New Hampshire is not exactly the population of DU only bigger.

Would it have been nice to have a Democrat in the position? Yes. Would trying to install one under these specific circumstances have likely blown up in our faces? Also yes.

Calm down. It's not ideal but it's not anything to go into a frothing rant about either. We run someone for the position in 2 years and we have a better chance of taking it now than against a long time entrenched incumbent. And from all reports Newman will vote more moderately than Gregg would have. So we didn't get ponies too... I'm sure we'll survive somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. Promising Gregg that he'd be replaced by a GOP
was the only way they could get him to take the job.

C'mon, Stinky, you know this is how it works!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Which, of course, begs the question .......
.... why Gregg?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. You're not wrong. All of them are not as stupid as we would like
to believe, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Kerry VonErich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Lets call it for what it is....
NH got blackmailed by its own senator turned commerce sec. designate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. oh well... new hampshire in 2010 .....?
wait till lahood runs for the senate in illinois in 2010 then the shit will hit the fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. WHO? WHO'S TAKING OVER NANCE GREGG'S SEAT?!!
I'M TELLING YOU IT'S A CONSPIRACY, DAMMIT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. Well here's what I think
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 06:12 PM by Duer 157099
Having had the first initial same reaction you have.

Frankly I think Obama should stop his *whatever-he's-doing* with the Repugs, but clearly he's not listening to me, so forget that option. It's frikken ironic that someone with an actual mandate doesn't know how to really work it. Oh well.

So Obama must be thinking something - I doubt he's dumb enough to have thought this was a good way to get to 60, so let's cross that one off too.

Maybe he really is looking down the line at that seat - Gregg apparently was firmly entrenched, and very conservative - so freeing up the seat for someone less entrenched and less conservative, and ultimately (in 2010) to get an actual Dem elected to the seat?

That's the only (admittedly weak) rationalization I can come up with.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Why bother voting against republicans when Obama can just appoint them?
Resistance is, apparently, futile.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. Sha-boing boing
You were saying?

Oh.

Sup Holmes. :) :hug:

Ugly as it is, it had better work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. Wow, that Bonnie Newman looks HOT! But are we sure she's 30 yet?
Hopefully she won't wear that cheerleader outfit in the Senate. We don't want to lose Robert Byrd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC