Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am SO irked about the Wells Fargo/Las Vegas "Junket" story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:25 PM
Original message
I am SO irked about the Wells Fargo/Las Vegas "Junket" story
Wells Fargo Balance Sheet (For the period ending 12-31-08

Wells Fargo Income Statement (For the period ending 12-31-08)


I can not believe the rabid frenzy over This.




Wells Fargo makes a hefty profit. They pay their taxes (Nearly 1.9 billion on 2008 earnings.) They did not want TARP money. They did not need TARP money. Their bank, unlike a certain "C" bank who will go nameless...



It was forced on the by Paulson. The US Government is the main beneficiary, not Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo paying $371.5 million {in dividends} to government



If they want to spend some of their profits on a Sales and Service Conference for its employees in Las Vegas, then who gives a flying fuck?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because they are spending taxpayer money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No they aren't.
It isn't tax-payer money anymore. Wells Fargo, at the Goverment's DEMAND, sold 25,000 shares of series D preferred stock.

The Government is making out like a bandit on this deal. (Wells Fargo has already paid $341,000,000 in dividends to the Federal Government)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They took 25 BILLION olf TARP money
They should pay back the price of their "junkets".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. They can't pay the money back. Not for a minimum three years.
The government wants some of those tasty dividends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That's bullshit and you know it... (figurativley speaking, of course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Here is a link to the technicals of the deal.
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 07:49 PM by PBS Poll-435
http://www.wallstnation.com/WFC-103008.HTML

Read where it specifically says:

"After three years, Wells Fargo can redeem the preferred securities at par value plus accrued and unpaid dividends."

And...:

As part of its purchase of the preferred securities, the Treasury Department also received warrants to purchase 110,261,688 shares of Wells Fargo’s common stock at an initial per share exercise price of $34.01.

Just in case they want some more tasty dividends...

Wells Fargo & Company Announces Dividend

San Francisco — January 28, 2009
Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) today announced a quarterly common stock dividend of 34 cents per share. The dividend is payable March 1, 2009, to stockholders of record on February 6, 2009. The Company has approximately 4.2 billion shares outstanding.

Wells Fargo & Company is a diversified financial services company with $1.3 trillion in assets, providing banking, insurance, investments, mortgage and consumer finance through more than 11,000 stores, over 12,000 ATMs and the internet (wellsfargo.com) across North America and internationally. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has the highest credit rating currently given to U.S. banks by Moody’s Investors Service, “Aa1,” and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, “AA+.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm so sorry, apparently I was grossly misinformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The TARP funds were used to buy the stock...
as an investment into the bank. Of course it's taxpayer money, but the taxpayer also owns a small portion of Wells Fargo as a result.

This does not give the taxpayer decision-making power in the company unless dictated in the initial agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have to admit
I don't understand this at ALL. You mean WF didn't need bailout money, and was "forced" to take some, so they spent it on Vegas booze, hookers and gambling? Whose fuckup was it? You say Paulson forced the money on WF, but that makes no sense.

We need to clone Obama because there are way too many HUGE fuckups left behind by the former criminals who ran this country for one man to fix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. All the large banks were summoned to the Treasury
and pretty much were told that all of them were going to take this money. No bank wanted to have an advantage over another as appearing to be "better" than the other. This move kept all banks on equal footing preventing a flood of customers to any one bank.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. It really wasn't "bailout" money. Wells Fargo sold them stock
And Wells Fargo won't let them buy it back for 3 years. The Government wanted to balance the bailout bucks. Citi is likely to need even more assistance before everything is said and done, so they needed to make-up some money somewhere. So they walked into Wells Fargo and pulled out a gun.


I found a good article on the technicals.

http://www.wallstnation.com/WFC-103008.HTML
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree with the OP
same with the outrage over BofA having a party at the Super Bowl. These fuckers are bilking us of billions, yet the media is trying to distract us with fluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Its symbolic
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 07:37 PM by juno jones
and in horribly bad form as they and others foreclose on working people across the country. It brings up the images of the Gilded Age and Robber Barons who partied their way across a depressed America in the 1870's, the Gatsbys of the 20's and 30's who could afford huge parties on 'New Egg' while the world starved around them.

It is shitty PR, is what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. I don't think it should have ever been a news story
Especially not one that was as slanted as the AP piece.

Wells Fargo should be able to reward their employees for the company's annual PROFIT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I have no problem with this trip...
But at least they aren't using the money to buy out other banks.

Wells Fargo paying $371.5 million to government
The big bank says taxpayers are reaping a dividend for their $25 billion investment.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/02/news/wells.dividend.fortune/

Wells (WFC, Fortune 500), which got $25 billion from Treasury last October in the first installment of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, also said that it has been lending money aggressively even as the economy sputters.

"Last quarter alone, we made $22 billion in loan commitments and $50 billion in mortgage originations," Wells finance chief Howard Atkins said in a midmorning press release Monday. He added that this is almost three times what the Treasury invested in the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. The fact that they have already paid dividends tells me one thing
Between the taxes and the dividends, it is more like Wells Fargo is bailing out the Federal Government than the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. Socialism for the wealthy...

not only can the wealthy afford expensive junkets using taxpayers' investment funds, but the government now derives its income from corporate profits. It's a win-win situation for the corporo-fascist government that bypasses the taxpayer altogether. The taxpayers can freeze to death in their homes for all the government cares, as they begin to cater to the corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I don't think that is the case here at all
This is a trip for the employees of Wells Fargo. Who paid their taxes and made a profit last year.

They are a very good corporate citizen and saved the Wachovia shareholders from the ridiculously stupid Vikram Pandit and a willing(and able) FDIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Wells Fargo is not necessarilly to blame...

if they have extra cash available, why not spend it on trips for employees?

I'm more concerned about the Federal Government being involved in such a relationship with profitable companies where it is a win-win situation all around for wealthy individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. self kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC