Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mass Transit -vs- Electic Cars Powered by Renewables

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pilsner Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:58 AM
Original message
Mass Transit -vs- Electic Cars Powered by Renewables
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 01:15 AM by pilsner
Electic cars powered by wind and solar is the only technology that has the potential to get to zero carbon emmissions and kick the oil and coal addictions.

Plus, for the most part America chose sprawl and highways long ago. Amerericans prefer the independence of personal cars. The toothpaste is already out of the tube and ain't going back in.

It would take significant investments to make Solartopia happen---upgrading electrical grid, installation of solar panels and wind turbines, etc.

The mayor of Columbus here is twisting arms to get $230 Million in seed money for a trolley to go up and down one street for 15 miles. The neighborhoods served by the trolley are affluent. Meanwhile, our bus service is seriously lacking.

Why should I be rooting for trolley and light rail projects in the stimulus bill when such investments are a zero sum game and would take away from investing in electric cars powered by renewables?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. clearly, you don't think much about sprawl, gridlock, or the ecological cost
of incessant highway building...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pilsner Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Columbus has a great highway systmem
it's not locked in on any sides by a body of water. It's very rare for me to get stuck in traffic although I wisely choose to live 5 miles from my job.

I would prefer that Columbus had a mass transit system such as D.C. or NYC but the city chose highways a long time ago.

At this point electric cars powered by renewables may be the only solution to save civilization as the research of global warming gets more and more disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Here in L.A., we can scarcely afford to keep imagining cars offer us much future
regardless of how they're powered... though yes, we also live in the shadow of dumb infrastructure decisions made decades ago...

Still, rails represent much of a future, transpo-wise, than trying to keep people buying, and driving, cars....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. You're right, and you're wrong
The bullshit "light rail" and "trolley" enthusiasts are generally Limo Liberals who'd like to take a fun trip from Macy's to the Zoo.

But you're wrong that Americans "chose" suburban sprawl and endless highways.

Public Transportation is what we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I love light rail. I use it as often as I possibly can.
Fortunately, I live near a light rail line in L.A. Unfortunately, it doesn't connect to all of the places I need to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. You're wrong. Sprawl is on its way out.
Homes are too large to heat, yards too expensive to maintain, infrastructure to support commuting by personal auto is inadequate and not worth growing.

Mixed use buildings, apartments over retail, are returning to many cities, including the silicon valley, and many people prefer the convenience.

What is unsustainable cannot last forever, and suburban sprawl and the personal automobile will not over time win out over relative growth in public transit.

You should visit NYC, or live there for a while, or talk to someone who lives in Manhattan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pilsner Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. What's the transporation solution to global warming?
Vehicles burn most of the oil. Coal supplies most of our electric. We have to change that or else shit's gonna hit the fan. Electic cars powered by renewables solve so many problems.

Yes, we keep investing to maintain mass transit in NYC, Boston, Chicago, DC but it's silly to invest in light rail in Columbus so college kids can have a nice way to the bars downtown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm totally pro electric cars, smart grid.
I work in the renewables industry, I drive a Prius, I might even make it electric and charge it from the 0.5 kW PV system I have.

The transportation solution includes more walking, less need for transportation in the first place.

Just like the energy solution includes fewer needs for it in the first place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. You'd rather the drunk college kids were driving???
If you're going to argue, at least take a minute to think about what you're going to say. Your's was not the best example.

AFIK, public transportation through "wealthy" neighborhoods exists to deliver the servants - you don't want the help parking an old Chevette in your driveway, do you? In many cities, those lines shut down at the end of the work day to keep the residents safe from the riff-raff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pilsner Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thanks for the laughs
A bus currently runs up and down the route (where the light rail would go) every five minutes for the college kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pilsner Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Sprawl and highways
I'm afraid the sprawl will be around as long as the highway system is. Not that I want the 5 acre lot 25 miles from my job downtown.

Politicians would rather release all prisoners than do away with funding to keep highways somewhat maintained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. America's population is aging. How many 80-years olds do you
want sharing the road with you as you drive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why not both? We can greatly reduce CO2 emissions and energy consumption by using Mass Transit
Why do we need to have one vs. the other.

And Mass Transit can be energy and renewable friendly to boot.

How about electric powered rail systems (using maglev) and hydrogen fuel cell busses (which have already been prototyped and put to use in several cities)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pilsner Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Investments are a zero sum game
The billions to build a trolley in Columbus would take away money to upgrade the electrical grid and install wind turbines & solar panels and fund battery r and d.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Um. No it wouldn't. The two go hand-in-hand.
If everyone switched to electric vehicles, the current delivery system couldn't handle it, even with wind and solar upgrades. You're dreaming if you think the answer is only in technology. We need to change the culture and consumption attitude before we can solve this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pilsner Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I read Wendell Berry and Thom Hartmann
and realize that technology doesn't provide all the solutions.

My point is that the current system can't make Solartopia possible because we need infrastructure investments. And, new trolleys aren't the best expenditure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. We need both. Rail pasenger transportation in the US is a disgrace. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC