Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can you prove someone was smoking marijuana from a picture?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 07:58 AM
Original message
How can you prove someone was smoking marijuana from a picture?
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 08:00 AM by marmar
He could have been inhaling Mountain Dew in the picture. Idiotic marijuana laws produce idiotic statements from idiots like these: :dunce:



Reuters via Yahoo!:



Phelps could face criminal charges: report


RALEIGH, North Carolina (Reuters) – Record-breaking Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps could face criminal charges following the publication of a photograph purportedly showing him smoking marijuana, The State newspaper of Columbia, South Carolina reported Tuesday.

A South Carolina law enforcement official said he would charge Phelps if he could prove the U.S. Olympian smoked marijuana in his county.

"This case is no different than any other case," Richland County Sheriff Leon Lott told The State.

Lott's comments come after a British newspaper published a photograph purportedly showing Phelps smoking marijuana at a party being held by students at the University of South Carolina in Columbia in November.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090204/sp_nm/us_swimming_phelps


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. told hubby last night. prove it wasnt tabacco. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Most guys who smoke a good bit of weed, well, you can just ask them. They'll tell you
And maybe offer you a hit too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. well, him admitting it is a start
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Did he actually admit he smoked marijuana - literally? I never heard him say that.
I've heard him say things like "made a youthful mistake" and "regret what I did" but not the words "I smoked marijuana." Implied, but not expressed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. if he said "I smoked marijuana" - then some would then claim
"but he didn't admit it was him who was in the picture."

c'mon - he admitted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. I'm sure he smoked it.....but lawyers can easily exploit those little technicalities.
n/t


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. all i heard him say is that it was a mistake and that he shouldnt have done it. did he
admit or say pot? i dont remember
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. so what was it he did but shouldn't have?
c'mon - he admitted it

No jury in this country would interpret his statement otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. look, i htink it is ridiculous that the police is going after him. i am all for him NOT
getting in trouble. i dont care if it is in your face obvious, the law is technical. and if he did not say yup, was smokin pot in that there bong, then i say fight it and get off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. oh I agree - to go after him is ridiculous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. That's not how the burden of proof works in a criminal case. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. is that statement not admissible as evidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Nope. But any 1L (or TV drama fan) knows the phrase "beyond a reasonable doubt".
Phelps doesn't have to prove what was not in the pipe; the state has to prove what was in the pipe to secure a conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. so it is an interesting predicament that he faces
He can probably beat any charges - although they would probably be quite minor. In doing so, he would also lose face with his fans - having beat those charges on a technicality.

Or - he can admit to it and pay a fine and probably be forgiven by the public - but maintain some marketing ability.

Comes down to dollars and cents (sense) once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Not exaclty. A resposible DA will not bring a case he knows he cannot win.
Which is why this won't likely rise beyond the level of the back-woods sheriffs involved...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. That's What I Was Wondering
It seems it's an unwinnable case. You answered my question, before i even asked it.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. You can't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. You can't, unless he admits it. It is a waste of money for this to be entertained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
.... callchet .... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. He should have said it helped him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. You're talking about a place
Where people believe Christ rose from the dead -- without any pictures at all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Criminial charges?! that is bullshit
what the hell is wrong with people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. He Can't...But It Sure Got Him On Teevee...
Any lawyer worth his degree would shoot holes through any case brought and then turn around and sue the crap out of the DA. All he has is a picture...not the bong nor fingerprints or anything else. Just a picture.

The precedence would be haunting if it weren't so laughable...this would allow any zealous prosecutor to waste time and money on witch hunts based on tabloids. Let's see if charges are brought...sure sounds like yet another "sherrif" with bigger plans hoping this is his springboard.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Good. The more absurd the better.
I hate these fucking close minded redneck bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. This is all a publicity stunt by a couple of backwoods sheriffs.
The same sort of "law enforcement officers" that scan the freeway, desperately seek for an out-of-state plate so that they can collect their "out of towners' tax". Many of them have credit card machines right in their cars!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
.... callchet .... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. The DA probably wrote his public apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
24. It's Nifong syndrome, all over again. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
26. Sometimes, a picture is all you need-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Exactly


;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Dance! Dance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
28. when oh when does the reefer madness end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
30. Well- if pictures are all thats needed, that Sheriff better get to work::

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. lol! good one! and where are ALL those pix of that s**t-for-brains w a coke mustache?
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 09:53 AM by ima_sinnic
I'm sure there are several dozen of him leaning in real close with a rolled-up $50 to a mirror with a razor blade and a "mysterious" "white powder."
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
33. Who really cares?
We all smoked pot at least once in our lives, right? He's not the head of the Department of Health and Human Services is he?

Don't tell me he's a role model. Parents and peers are your childrens' role models.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
34. This is all just bluster on the part of the Sheriff
He knows that there is not enough evidence to prosecute, but will go through the motions to show that he is tough on crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
36. There are usually
the dead bodies of the marijuana addict's victims, as well as mangled automobiles in the background. Another clue is if the addict is playing piano in the photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC