Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I need help

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:50 AM
Original message
I need help
I wrote an article titled There is no pork barrel spending in the Stimulus package.

I am getting the majority of comments from right wing Republicans, most notably someone named Luann who also commented on my article about Karl Rove that when he broke into a Democratic candidates' office to steal the letterhead and then sent fake letters out trying to get his candidate elected, wrote that that was just a college prank and that he is no worse than any other politician.

So I am hoping that some of you will show some support by going to my article and making some comments about it from the Democratic point of view.

Please feel free to comment on any of my other articles. I'm starting to think only Republicans read my articles. I've been called everything from a "this broad" to things I can't even bring myself to repeat here, so please help.

Thanks,
Karen Harper
Birmingham Progressive Politics Examiner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Please?
Sorry to whine but I'm really getting disheartened by the lack of any positive response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks
To the people who have commented, I really appreciate it.

I have one person who comments on a lot of my articles in a really annoying way and she posts comments longer than the original article and I'm really getting tired of it.

So a great big THANKS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. sorry to rain on your parade so to speak
But though technically it may not be pork barrel spending, it sure looks like it. Im not sure how all those millions are meant to stimulate the economy, i would much prefer a clean bill listing exactly what goes where and we can deal with the other stuff seperately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. yep -- there's definitely a conversation to be had here...
so, fertile ground for discussion. i could do without the money for furniture for Homeland Security -- hell, i could do without Homeland Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. it's not the same
It's not pork barrel spending. I too prefer a clean bill that is aimed at just Stimulus but then of course one could argue that what you think is not a stimulus is and vice versa. For example, one of the things the GOP objects to is the building of offices for Homeland Security department. That will put people to work.

The point is that pork barrel spending is designed to please a certain politicians' constituents. These items, while I don't necessarily agree they belong in the Stimulus bill, are not pork barrel spending.

Tax cuts don't work. WE all figured this out with Bush's tax cuts and tax rebates. The economy just got worse.

I for one actually think we need more infrastructure spending than the bill calls for. I would like to see it as all infrastructure building and NO tax cuts. But apparently I'm the only person that thinks that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. apparently so, i sure as hell would rather see us the little people spending the money
rather than the governement, at least i know where i can buy a toilet seat that dosent cost $10,000, I am very reticent to let the government no matter who is in power spend my money without having a real close look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Done!
There really aren't that many RW nutjobs, but they are really, really noisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I hope you're right
Sometimes it seems like they are in the majority even though they obviously aren't. I wonder if now that we have a Democrat in the White House and a majority in the house, if we are becoming more complacent. I got a lot more comments on articles from Democrats when Bush was in office than I do now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrycarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. I have your page bookmarked.
I live just up the road in Gadsden. It is comforting that there is at least one other progressive in this state. I commented on your latest article yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. it's hard to believe
that there's more than one of us in Alabama!

Actually I know a few people who are liberals...ehrm, let me see (counting) well including my husband and children and a couple of friends that makes about 6. Wow. Wheeeeee. Now I can add you so that's 7.

Maybe we should do a poll.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Moody's Analysis
Karen,

The analysis I mentioned is at:
http://www.economy.com/dismal/article_free.asp?cid=102598

I tried to post the link with the comments, but apparently posting links in comments is not permitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. thanks
A lot of great information there. I may have to use it in a future article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC