Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Police Chief Files Bylaw Prohibiting Public Consumption Of Marijuana

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:24 PM
Original message
Police Chief Files Bylaw Prohibiting Public Consumption Of Marijuana
Police Chief Files Bylaw Prohibiting Public Consumption Of Marijuana

by William F. Galvin

HARWICH -- Just as the public is forbidden to consume alcohol on public property by town bylaw, Police Chief William Mason has proposed a bylaw to be acted upon in the annual town meeting in May prohibiting the consumption of marijuana in public.

The bylaw proposal is necessary given passage of a state-wide referendum question in the November election which decriminalized possession of small amounts of marijuana, Mason said. The law now in effect sets a civil fine of $100 and no longer requires a report to the state’s criminal history board for people caught possessing small amounts of cannabis.

“It’s not a one-ounce possession bylaw, it deals with consumption,” the police chief said of his proposal.

The bylaw would not supersede the state law, Mason said, because that law relates to a person in the possession of marijuana and the bylaw relates to public consumption.

In Massachusetts the referendum passed by nearly a two-to-one margin. In Harwich voters supported the decriminalization of less than an ounce of marijuana by a 4,839 to 2,947 vote.

http://www.capecodchronicle.com/harnews/har020509_1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. This marijuana law actually makes sense. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Resonable law.
Even within states that have approved medical marijuana, restriction on public consumption seems ok.

Besides, if you smoke in public others will want some too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reasonable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Iff there is a concomitant ban on public alcohol
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 03:36 PM by Fovea
then this makes sense. If selective prosecution, no.
I mean, sloshing, obnoxious drunk on the sidewalk on St. Pat's Day OK?
And getting fined for quietly firing one up ?

To me that does not fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. It would be open to challenge
The reason there's a ban on the public consumption of alcohol is because alcohol sale and consumption is related to licensed facilities. They don't want people taking the alcohol out of the licensed facilities. Also, in many places the laws against public consumption are racially related.

I used to live in a community that had been predominantly white and started to see an influx of immigrants from the carribean. All of a sudden, the public consumption laws -- rarely enforced before -- became a hot topic. Most of the white people drank behind closed doors -- some in total secrecy. However, Carribean culture tends to be more outdoor-related. So, it was a way to bust immigrants heads under the guise of enforcing some stupid law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC