Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists Find Earliest Evidence of Animal Life

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:26 AM
Original message
Scientists Find Earliest Evidence of Animal Life
Source: ABC
By MICHAEL KAHN
February 4, 2009

LONDON (Reuters) - Chemical traces left in 635 million-year-old rocks in Oman provide the earliest evidence so far of animal life, researchers said Wednesday.

The oldest sponge steroids detected in sedimentary rocks underly this cap carbonate,so pre-date the end of the Marinoan glaciations.
(Courtesy David Fik/NPG)The findings, published about a week before the 200th birthday of Charles Darwin, are also proof of the simple organisms the English naturalist said must have existed before evolving into more complex creatures, they researchers said.

"Basically we have found a thread of that evidence that he predicted should be there," said Roger Summons, a geobiologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who worked on the study.

"There is a great wealth of evidence these sponges were the first multi-cellular organisms to exist."

Using a chemical analysis of molecules in rocks dated to 635 million years ago, the researchers discovered a modified form of cholesterol only produced by the sponges

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=6804066
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. 635 million years! Hard to even imagine such a time-frame. But that's how long it
took, more or less, for Nature to develop consciousness on Earth--out of a muck of tiny sponges and other goo.

I know that there are some theories around that us, thinking about it all, was random chance. Good theories, backed by a lot of evidence. And I do understand that we need to stop being such self-worshiping, ego-centric critters, thinking we're top of the chain, and it's all about us. But still, you gotto stand back in wonder at how we got here. And some of us--maybe most of us, at one time or another--DO stand back in wonder at how we got here. That may be the definition of us. Why would Nature do that? Or, put more scientifically, why would that succeed?

OR, given the mind-boggling time-frames of the development of suns, planets and life, maybe we are unable to grasp how brief and unimportant our success as as species has been, how little it matters that we were able to stand here and wonder at our existence, and what a failure our consciousness has been, as to preserving ourselves and our mother planet.

Oh dear.

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC