Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Effort to divert $5.2 billion in stimulus package for Pentagon weapons purchases fails in Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:41 AM
Original message
Effort to divert $5.2 billion in stimulus package for Pentagon weapons purchases fails in Senate
Thursday Feb 5, 2009 10:55:43 EST

The Senate rejected an attempt to divert $5.2 billion of more than $900 billion in economic recovery money to pay for defense weapons purchases.

By 59-38 vote Wednesday night, the Senate blocked an amendment sponsored by Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., to use money in HR 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, to restore combat readiness and replace war reserves and prepositioned stockpiles.

The vote came on a procedural motion on which Inhofe needed 60 votes for his amendment to be considered. The vote came in a blizzard of action during which the Senate disposed of about 28 of the more than 300 amendments pending on the recovery bill.

Inhofe argued, unsuccessfully, that spending money on military weapons was a good way to stimulate the economy.

No one spoke against Inhofe’s amendment. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the Senate Finance Committee chairman responsible for many provisions in the economy recovery bill, raised a budgetary point of order because passage of the amendment would allow defense spending to exceed budget caps.

http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2009/02/military_inhofe_defensebudget_020509w/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. guns, not butter. The Guns Only Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Defense already dominates the budget
. . . it's ludicrous to suggest inflating it beyond actual need. Even more ridiculous to rely on those expenditures for 'emergency' stimulus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Inhofe sponsored the amendment. It figures.
"Let them eat bullets." :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC