Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should a 10% GDP Stimulus reduce

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:53 PM
Original message
Should a 10% GDP Stimulus reduce
the federal unemployment rate by 10% as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. GDP and unemployment have a relationship, but it definitely is not 1 to 1.
You can grow GDP by 2% a year and still see unemployment rise due to gains in productivity and growth of the labor force. You generally have to be growing by at least 3% per year to see unemployment fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. A 10% of our GDP 'stimulus' created from thin air and borrowed money
only puts us deeper in the hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I suppose WWII spending did absolutely nothing but crank debt up to 120% of GDP.
No positive effects or anything. I'll ignore that 150% increase in GDP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. the difference is this: back then we made things
we had a manufacturing base that drove that recovery. The service industry will most certainly not be able to perform this function, and we no longer have much of a manufacturing base here.

That said: if the money were spent on invigorating manufacturing -- if we went back to making things -- we would recover much better.

However, handing out more taxpayer dollars to inside players will not accomplish this, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. We have the world's highest industrial output by shear dollar volume.
We are the largest producers of capital equipment. If money is spent there that is very positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC