Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who should Obama name to the Supreme Court when it becomes necessary?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:45 PM
Original message
Who should Obama name to the Supreme Court when it becomes necessary?
I don't want to jump the gun but with the news of Ginsburg today and the fact that being able to appoint SCOTUS members is one of the most important things to come from Obama's election, I'm just curious who you'd like to see there?!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. It better not be a "bipartisan" pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Beat me to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ditto. It had better be the Hilda Solis of judges. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Completely agree with you there!! But seriously who?
I've been trying to think who would be amazing in this position to really even things out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xenussister Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Vincent Bugliosi, no bipartisanship there!
Can you imagine the awkward silences?

I wanted him for Attorney General. Sigh.

My thoughts and good wishes go out to Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainbowreflect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #39
51. That would be my choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bill Clinton
That would be sure to be a popular pick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. No thank you
We do NOT need another corporatist on the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #32
52. Dennis then
I wouldn't complain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #52
64. Me either!
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. We need a progressive to balance out Bush's picks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Me. I promise I'd study hard and do a good job. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ralph Nadar. I bet you a dollar he's paid all his taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. makes sense to have him on the court after the 2000 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. Oh good heavens, not that egomaniac. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. What do you think? Is Ralph current on his taxes or do you think he might have fudged?
Current, is my call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Current. But that might be the only thing to recommend him! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
62. Nader, of course . . . someone who understands ALL that has gone on ...
in our nation and been warning us for more than three decades!!!

Nader has long been involved with all the issues we are concerned with ---

from prison reform to homeless, from corrupt capitalism to buying of government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dennis Kucinich!
If you want a progressive, dont compromise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I thought about that. He would definitely rock but I wonder if he'd be willing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe Robert Bork
That would be the ultimate in "reaching out"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't know enough about the qualified judges to make a choice, but I do think he needs to select
somebody who is left of center and somebody young enough who could potentially serve many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. How bout Sen Feingold? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Yes - young and liberal. No one who can be 'persuaded' to
vote with the fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #26
53. Don't forget Female,
If Ginsburg leaves the bench,there will be much political pressure to replace her with another woman. JMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. I've long suggested Nadine Strossen as a replacement for Ginsberg when that day comes...
it'd be the most interesting confirmation hearing for a while.

A former President of the ACLU who sits on the board of NORML, a feminist, an atheist, a staunch civil libertarian, a defender of free speech and the right to personal reproductive freedom, sits on the Council of Foreign Relations, is considered to be one of the great legal minds living today, has been recognized as one of the most influential lawyers in the US by the National Law Journal, the star of the faculty of one of the best law schools in America (NYU), is under 60 and a staunch critic of Bush DOJ legal policies and positions.

How are you going to argue that she unqualified if you're a Republican? She's on face-value more qualified than anybody that Bush nominated. The only thing she lacks is federal bench experience and that's made up for by the shear amount of time she's spent as a lawyer in front of the federal bench and SCOTUS.

She's in every way the perfect successor to Ruth Bader Ginsberg...who also gained prominence in the legal community as a hard-nosed unrelenting lawyer for the ACLU who asked sharp questions and cut opposing lawyers arguments to shreds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lawrence Tribe
Smart, liberal and not 900 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. I like him a lot but wouldn't mind if he was even younger. No question tho
he's definitely on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. John Perry Barlow. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. What was the name of the guy who said it was understandable to
attempt to do a citizen's arrest on Cheney? Or any of the ones who've helped reverse the wiretapping or Seigelman decisions? Are there no liberal/progressive stars in the legal system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComtesseDeSpair Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Justice Marilyn Milian!
Well, in my perfect world, anyway. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
63. A TV show Judge HOST . . . ???
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 02:09 PM by defendandprotect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. How about Ackerman...nice job the other day! Carolyn Maloney/NYC . . .
Don Siegelmann ---

Keep in mind that had McCain won, we'd probably have Gonzalez on SC --- !!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComtesseDeSpair Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #63
71. Have you ever watched the show???
She was a prosecutor before she did the show and she is sharp as a well honed tack. She's not like the other pathetic TV judges - like Judge Judy or that asshole guy in Chicago (can't remember his name). She catches everything and has an excellent liberal perspective on things. I love her - I think she'd be awesome. But unfortunately, no one would ever take her seriously because she's been on TV. Your comment is proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. a liberal woman
Given that there are plenty of highly qualified women candidates out there, I will be immensely pissed off if we end up back in the situation where there is not a single woman on the highest court in the land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXDemGal Donating Member (600 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Agree with that!
I also think the appointee should be a person of color.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. oh oh oh...I have it
Anita Hill.

Wouldn't that just put a knot in a bunch of people's shorts. *snort*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh PERFECT!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. OOOOOOO I like that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I'd love to see Michelle Obama if it didn't reek of nepotism! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Yeah!!!!! Thank you!!!!!
A liberal woman really should be his first appointment WHOMEVER he is replacing. It is disgraceful that there is only one woman on the Supreme Court, and, that of 9 Justices, only TWO women have ever served. Women are 51% of the population of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. . . . and a minority would be fabulous too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Tommy Chong
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. That would definitely be cause for a lot of squinty smiles :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. This is not really the right time to discuss that, in my opinion.
Seems kind of ghoulish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. Howard Dean,
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
31. Justice Allan Page from MN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moostache Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. All right, don't twist so hard....I'll do it...
Hey, so I do not have a law degree, have never held an elected office and generally behave like a liberal version of the boorish Rethugs that drive me crazy.....BUT....I DID graduate from the same high school that gave us Chief Justice Roberts (much to my chagrin) and I believe it would only be fair to allow me to serve a counterweight to him on the SCOTUS!

And seriously, haven't we learned anything from the Republican playbook yet? Reagan? GWB? Palin? Sweet Jebus! I may lack credentials in some respects, but compared to the those three I look like an amalgam of Einstein, Newton and Copernicus!!!

How hard could it be really? Essentially my job would be to object to anything Roberts says and to rule opposite him and Scalia on every issue that requires it...I think we could have my 11-year old daughter perform that role!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
35. Larry Tribe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
37. Hillary Clinton - all vetted and then some.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Anita Hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
43. jonathan turley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
44. Caroline Kennedy.
a flaming liberal constitutional expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. P.S. Get well soon Justice Ginsburg!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Absolutely!
At the same time, we know that Obama will be naming SCOTUS members at some point. I suspect some have been holding on for a while and are more than ready to retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
45. I think I trust Obama to figure that out. That's what we "hired" him for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Considering he admitted to making a mistake in his noms this week
I didn't think it would be a bad idea to get some input. I believe that's what he asked for and why he set up the interactive website . . . so we the people could have a say for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
49. Someone young and liberal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheNeoCons Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
50. Jennifer Granholm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
54. Jello Biafra
Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
55. HAROLD HONGJU KOH !!!
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 07:39 AM by HamdenRice
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=4986778&mesg_id=4986778

He led efforts to stop US human rights abuses and detention without trial. These efforts go all the way back to the US detention of Haitians at Guantanomo during the Clinton years.

He's Dean of the Yale Law School and would be the first Asian American Supreme Court Justice.

He's a progressive Democrat, he's only 54, a legal genius and well respected scholar.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Awesome - thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
56. Sonia Sotomayor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. That's the name I keep running across.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. That's a great one too! It certainly wouldn't make Rush happy!
Wouldn't that be sad?!?!? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #56
69. I'm not a huge fan...
by no means a liberal or even a left-leaning-moderate politically, is considered to be a legal centrist and holds her personal opinions way too close to the robe for my personal liking. I fear that she could be our Souter, who was appointed by G.H.W. Bush and was thought to be a marginal conservative during confirmation but votes a liberal POV 70% of the time.

Everything I fear can be summed up in the fact that supposedly G.W. Bush considered appointing Sotomayor for the seat currently held by Alito until it was made clear to him that the GOP party base and Congressional representation might revolt if he appointed anybody who refused to vocally-take a staunch pro-life position.

The last thing we need is a justice appointed by a Democrat who goes maverick and votes with the Scalia/Thomas/Alito block any appreciable % of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #56
70. Yup. Either Sonia Sotomayor or Johnnie B. Rawlinson.
Elena Kagan would be a good one ... after she serves as Solicitor General for a bit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
61. I'd be asking the NAACP for recommendations ---
and return to input from the ABA again ---

Bush's appointments were so vile they had to disconnect from ABA ---

vile and incompetent. In the case of Thomas, I'd say legally criminal and perverted.

Also women's groups ---

You don't have to be a lawyer to be on the SC -- and I think we probably have too many

lawyers now ---

Obviously, Barbara Jordan should have been Chief Justice!

We need strong advocates for women and Human Rights . . .

for Native Americans, African-Americans, Homosexuals, etal.

I'm at the moment really not familiar with current names.

There's a female judge in NYC -- Kaye?

I think Fine -- who appears on TV and is actually a Republican would be the least --

he's a strong supporter of Constitutional rights. Is for impeachment of Bush.

Turley? Is that the correct name? Appears on TV. Makes a lot of sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. Or the ACLU!
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
67. It wont matter
No matter who he picks it will encite the proper level of pout rage here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. ...because DU'ers just like to "pout and rage" . . . !
Couldn't be because of inane decisions, could it?

Like Gregg for FCC ---

want to defend that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itcfish Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
72. Ellen Degeneres
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC