For President Obama to treat individual Republicans with civility is one thing. Etiquette, however, has its limits. Embracing bipartisanship as a political goal can be a snare and a delusion.
It has certainly seemed so of late, as GOP congressmen responded to Obama's friendly overtures by voting unanimously against his desperately needed economic stimulus, persevering in their party's cultlike faith in tax cuts and aligning themselves with a bombastic radio talker who brags that he wants the president to fail.
In response, the mannerly official scorers at ABC's "The Note" awarded the president "a goose egg in the first inning of bipartisanship," although the stimulus package passed in the House by a vote of 244-188. Never mind that the White House had dropped a couple of spending items-subsidized contraceptives and refurbishing the National Mall-that Republicans disliked. Washington Post editors lamented that "Obama had the controversial provisions removed, but too late to win over Republicans."
Too late? The new administration was one week old. The changes preceded the vote. Persons more concerned with substance than manners might suspect that hopeful chatter about bipartisanship is a sucker's game. How often did pundits urge President George W. Bush to be sensitive to Democrats' delicate feelings? The Post's idea of centrism appears to be the balance of opinion at a K Street lobbyists' cocktail party.
The last time we had a new Democratic president, essentially the same thing happened. Republican congressmen voted against Bill Clinton's 1993 tax and budget proposals, uniformly predicting doom. Raising marginal income tax rates a few points on the wealthy, they charged, would lead to economic ruin. Instead, the exact opposite happened. Over the ensuing eight years, the nation witnessed the creation of 25 million new jobs, a balanced federal budget and steadily rising prosperity.
http://www.nwanews.com/adg/Editorial/251419/