Can someone explain to me how the unemployment statistics
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 01:57 PM
Original message |
Can someone explain to me how the unemployment statistics |
|
as we have them today are misleading as to understating the true level of unemployment? thanks in advance.
|
GodlessBiker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The statistic does not count those who have given up looking or have taken a part-time job. |
|
Reality is worse than the unemployment figure suggests.
|
Lost4words
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I think a truly accurate count would surprise even us, not to mention the UNDER-EMPLOYED.
|
prolesunited
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yes, there are millions of people who are underemployed |
|
They have run out of benefits and taken any job available just to have some income.
|
eridani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. Doesn't count non-violent drug users in prison and their useless guards either |
|
Probably more significant than fudged numbers in determining our differences from the rest of the industrialized world.
|
marketcrazy1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Bureau of Labor Statistics |
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Right, but long ago, the stats were more accurate - didn't Reagan |
|
initiate some sort of changes to the method of collecting the stats which rendered them less useful, but made employment stats look better?
|
marketcrazy1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
of the birth/death model?? started using it in 2000???
|
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yeah, that may be it. |
|
I just recall that a while back, it was compiled differently, and over time, it's been neutered so as not to embarrass whoever is the current occupant of the Oval Office.
|
TimesSquareCowboy
(222 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. Well, Clinton did, too. |
|
And the reporting is not for every employer - the BLS takes the actual numbers they have and guesses at how many additional jobs were created. There's a columnist in the NY Post who's been covering this and other government statistics fudging for a long time, it's interesting to read.
|
Wilber_Stool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
indicate the people that have never had a job because they are just now entering the work force.
|
GodlessBiker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. That's a good point. New grads from undergraduate, law, business schools. |
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Short answer: When your unemployment runs out they quit counting you |
|
Doesn't matter if you are still looking for a job or not.
|
TimesSquareCowboy
(222 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I posted an article that puts the real number at 13.9% |
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:12 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.