|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 04:47 PM Original message |
Remember back in 1993 when Clinton wanted a huge stimulus bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. The situation wasn't nearly as dire in '93 as it is now, the big issue was the deficits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think lock step originated with the Nazi's... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rusty quoin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. How can you tell the difference between the two groups? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 05:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. The guy who can't see leading the blind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I am sure you are correct but I was referring to US political terms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 05:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. !9th century U.S. prisons, according to wiki. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. Oh, an optimist! Sure you'll get rich buying foreclosed houses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. While I appreciate the history lesson on GOP lock step opposition to stimulus bills |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. No we didn't have "substantial" majority. VERY slim and Dems LOST seats in '92. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I think the majority was actually bigger then than now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. And the Dems were more conservative than they are now. The tide was shifting right. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 07:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. That's if you count Richard Shelby, Howell Heflin, Jim Exon, Sam Nunn, Ben Campbell as Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. it wasn't primarily a stimulus bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. No you are referring to Clinton's Budget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 07:44 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. well if there was an earlier bill, his budget was called a stimulus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-06-09 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
14. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC