Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone else get the feeling that TIME magazine is moving to the right?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:15 PM
Original message
Does anyone else get the feeling that TIME magazine is moving to the right?
More and more I seem to be reading about Republican and religious issues in Time.
Also their content seems to be getting lighter and emptier.
The new layout also pushes huge cartoony titles pictures and text at the expense
of content.

I always considered Time to be a fairly neutral digest of news from the week with a
few slightly in depth articles.

Now it seems to be becoming a tract written for the right wing illiterati.

Anyone else sensing this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't see how they could move much further right
They have been this way for a long time. Perhaps they finally have dropped any sort of "let's pretend we are centralist" stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. So by my calculation that would have to mean
that they are now either totalitarian fascist or have circled right around to totalitarian communist, as there wasn't any other room on the right for them to move to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Are you kidding me?
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 03:25 PM by zidzi
I dropped time years ago because all I saw was cover up reporting about the bushit regime.

I'm always Shocked I tell you when I read something factual in newsweak or time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sensing? I cancelled my subscription years ago.
After a slew of stories about the Virgin Mary, miracles, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. I guess you haven't been reading it long
It has been a wing-nut publication justifying torture, illegal war and lying steadfastly for the entirety of the Bush administration and for years previous, all while pretending to be a neutral media outlet. If they moved any further to the right, they would have to merge with The National Review.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. What's decent alternative in your opinion?
Something that gives a digest of the news, not in depth articles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Utne Reader
For more depth, the Progressive, the Nation. Hell, Vanity Fair does a better job than Time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Rolling Stone has done some amazing reporting lately
Actually for quite awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yes. The RFK Jr story & others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. The British press does a MUCH better job than ours.
BBC, Guardian, and Observer - online.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Founded by an enthusiastic Fascist
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 03:45 PM by SOS
"America needs at this moment a moral leader, a national moral leader. The outstanding national moral leader of the world today is Mussolini."
-Henry Luce, 1928

"A state reborn by virtue of Fascist symbols, Fascist rank and hence Fascist enterprise."
Henry Luce on Italy under Mussolini, Nov. 28, 1930

"The moral force of Fascism, appearing in totally different forms in different nations, may be the inspiration for the next general march of mankind."
-Henry Luce, April 19, 1934

Luce switched from Fascism to the Republican Party after Pearl Harbor.
He edited Time until 1964.

Time has been right-wing since it's first days as a fascist publication.

On edit:
Richard D. Parsons, Time/Warner CEO, is a Bush supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Hugh Sidey helped Bush1 for DECADES - always covering up his crimes of office.
The Bushes ended up hosting the Hugh Sidey Scholarship after he died - a little something for the future fascist propagandist of choice.


Sidey's death announcement. Note the bit by Matt Cooper (another BFEE protector



Hugh Sidey, who covered the White House and the American Presidency for TIME for close to half a century, died Monday night in Paris of a heart attack. He was 78. Born and raised in Iowa, Sidey came to understand the presidents of the last 48 years as well as anyone. He was with Kennedy in Dallas and Nixon in China. He was the iconic insider, staying close to many presidents even after they left the White House, becoming great friends with Ronald Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush.

A fourth-generation journalist and son of a country editor in Greenfield, Iowa, Sidey never became a prisoner of the Beltway. He'd often go home to Iowa to listen and learn what Americans were thinking. He was among the first print journalists on regular television, appearing on the late Agronsky & Company. As he scaled back his work for TIME, he continued to be deeply involved in the life of the White House. He was active in the White House Historical Association and co-wrote a book, The Presidents of the United States of America, that is a good history of the men and the office.

Though retired, Sidey continued to work for TIME, and had been on assignment for the magazine as recently as last week.


Sidey Remembered by Colleagues and Friends


Matthew Cooper
TIME White House Correspondent

The Hugh Sidey I knew at TIME was endlessly genial. He'd come by the Washington bureau long after his "retirement," always dapper in coat and tie, to see "what's happening." "How are we doing?" he'd ask, actually wanting to know about those of us still in the trenches and to get caught up on the latest gossip. He'd always have plenty of it himself, often providing delicious tidbits that had eluded those of us covering the Oval Office. When I had questions about the Bush White House, I'd often run them by Hugh and I'd find he'd have nuggets like how the 41st president loved to email friends racy jokes and how father and son had stopped talking about the war. Indeed, Hugh was the first to flag for me how deep the rift over Iraq was between allies of the father and son presidents. He also understood the Reagan family dynamic better than anyone. And he was always endlessly supportive to those of us who followed him, offering advice and counsel and encouragement. When I faced a possible prison sentence last summer for not testifying in the CIA leak case— I eventually did talk to the Fitzgerald grand jury—I had some close friends write letters to the judge, asking for mercy. The first person I thought of to testify for my character was the most respected man I knew, Hugh Sidey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. TIME has been RW for decades - old and dear friends of Poppy Bush controlled
that rag for many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Time has been right. You are NOW saying Time has gone NEOCON right..
I ended my subscription long ago for Time's RW positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes, about 20+ years ago
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. TIME is moving foward ...
to irrelevance. Which suits most of it's writers ambitions just dandy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. From what I remember...
...it has always had a right lean in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. They really came out
of the closet when Reagan was elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC