Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Whiff of change in US medical marijuana policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:22 PM
Original message
AP: Whiff of change in US medical marijuana policy
Edited on Sat Feb-07-09 01:29 PM by Pirate Smile
Whiff of change in US medical marijuana policy

WASHINGTON – The White House won't say it explicitly. Neither will the Drug Enforcement Administration. Yet there is a whiff in the air that U.S. policy is about to change when it comes to medical marijuana.
The message is clear, said UCLA professor Mark Kleiman, a former Justice Department official and an expert on crime and drug policy.
"It is no longer federal policy to beat up on hippies," said Kleiman.

-snip-
That may be the law, but it contradicts the medical marijuana position of the new president.
"The president believes that federal resources should not be used to circumvent state laws, and as he continues to appoint senior leadership to fill out the ranks of the federal government, he expects them to review their policies with that in mind," said White House spokesman Nick Shapiro, repeating past statements.

So on Friday, DEA officials in Washington declined to comment at all on the subject.
As a presidential candidate, Obama repeatedly promised a change in federal drug policy in situations where state laws allow use of medical marijuana.
"I think the basic concept of using medical marijuana for the same purposes and with the same controls as other drugs prescribed by doctors, I think that's entirely appropriate," Obama told the Mail Tribune of Medford, Ore., in March.
A year earlier at a campaign stop in New Hampshire, Obama said: "I would not have the Justice Department prosecuting and raiding medical marijuana users."

-snip-
The new president is unlikely to make any official change in policy before he has a new DEA chief and drug czar in place.
Yet experts believe it is already clear the Obama administration will change the strategy, if not the law, on medical marijuana.

-snip-
So last week's raids in California may be the last of their kind.
"The DEA's not likely to want to confront a new president," said Heymann. "It may simply be that they're behaving as they have traditionally, and they haven't anticipated the change Obama and his spokesman are signaling."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090207/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama_medical_marijuana;_ylt=Atxrn57NfIX8ZTFcvNul8AiyFz4D


More from The Field:

White House: DEA Raids in Medical Marijuana States Will Stop

Posted by Al Giordano - February 6, 2009 at 2:45 pm By Al Giordano




No sooner was President Obama sworn in than the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) decided to provoke him.

Two days after the January 20 inauguration - before the Senate had confirmed the nomination of Attorney General Eric Holder - the DEA raided a medical marijuana dispensary in South Lake Tahoe, California, one of the states that has made such facilities legal. This, with full knowledge that as a presidential candidate Obama had pledged to discontinue such raids.

Yesterday, the DEA carried out multiple raids at medical marijuana clinics in the Los Angeles area. According to MSNBC:

A Los Angeles police spokesperson said the department, which is normally notified of such operations, got no advance warning from DEA.


In other words, the DEA was so worried that the LAPD might alert the White House of its plans beforehand and so it bypassed the normal procedure there.

This has of course led to a chorus of Chicken Little-ing from some corners of drug policy reform that Obama and/or Holder never intended to keep Obama's campaign promise to end the raids in states that permit medical marijuana clinics for patients with cancer, glaucoma, AIDS and other ailments treated by the plant.

Today, the White House made it clear to the Reuters news agency that the DEA is acting without its blessing:

White House spokesman Nick Shapiro on Wednesday reiterated Obama's stance that "federal resources should not be used to circumvent state laws."

"And as he continues to appoint senior leadership to fill out the ranks of the federal government, he expects them to review their policies with that in mind," Shapiro said.


So, everybody chill. Rome wasn't destroyed in a day. Although there are some economic libertarians, Ron Paul enthusiasts, and beautiful losers in parts of the drug policy reform milieu that apparently would rather see the Obama administration break its promises - so as to be able to crow that nothing ever changes and to be able to continue their own daily poutrage - the vast majority of us absolutely want the raids to end and understand it will take not a lot, but yes a little bit, of time to clear the bureaucracy of insubordinates and steer the ship of Justice back on track.

Meanwhile, if patience is that hard, there's probably a medicine somewhere that can help.


http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefield/white-house-dea-raids-medical-marijuana-states-will-stop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's called respecting states rights
And I don't want to hear tired old analogies with the segreghation era, either. That was the past. The distant past, and that issue is settled.

No, states rights means allowing states to have their own laws concerning drugs. I want "states rights" turned into code words for free pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I added some more to the OP that deals with the State's Rights side of the issue.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. The DEA agents simply wanted to grab some good dro and $$
this week before they are cut off from their cash/drug cow.

No arrests? No charges I've heard? So why bust in the doors, smash the place up and take weed and money?

If you're a DEA agent, apparently you're used to getting your "money for nothing and your weed for free."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hear Here!!!!
to a distant relative cop. ( at our nephews Bday party) I was pointing out that the DEA has not been charging anyone with crimes lately. Just busting in and taking the money and pot. and his head exploded. he went off and said I was lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Error!
Edited on Sat Feb-07-09 02:20 PM by Tsiyu


this did not post.

Yeah, it did! Sorry :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Just thugs like the mafia


Busting in the place for protection money.

This administration needs to wake up as soon as possible and realize that thugs like the DEA are causing our kids to have zero respect for law enforcement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. The DEA is a criminal enterprise

Just do a google on DEA agents getting caught
in the trading of drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. The DEA answers to the Executive. This could've stopped on 1/21/2009
if President Obama wanted it to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. One Might Expect a Bit of Insubordination When the Hard-Liners Know They'll Get Fired Anyway
The lack of charges reflects their realization that they do not have the blessing of the administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Right. But it's only "insubordination" if the Executive orders them to stop. He hasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. We have a President who takes a common sense approach
and respects states' rights. I love how he prioritizes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC