Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Rush Limbaugh is a PRIVATE citizen, who has posed his opinions on the PUBLIC airwaves"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 06:38 PM
Original message
"Rush Limbaugh is a PRIVATE citizen, who has posed his opinions on the PUBLIC airwaves"
Edited on Sat Feb-07-09 06:48 PM by SoCalDem
Michael Steele accidentally spoke to the heart of the problem..

Once you are on the PUBLIC airwaves, you have forfeited your right to be just a "private citizen"..especially when you spend all that "air-time" denigrating, criticizing, and slandering ONE political party..

Rush IS a republican spokesperson, even if he did "occasionally" bash Bush a little.,. he only did THAT, after it was well-proven, that Bush had little support in his party..

It's high time that the act of political speech is addressed, in a substantive way.

Political speech proffered by candidates, costs BIG BUCKS, when they have to buy ads.

Some political speech, even with an offer to pay for the ad, is DENIED by corporate media, effectively shutting the door on those ideas, completely.

Only the Conservatives get ample FREE air-time for their lame ideas..radio,print, and tv.
All others must pay, IF their ads are even accepted.

The rare times they are "invited" to appear, are accompanied by oppositional guests..LOUD ones, who interrupt more often than the "hosts", making their message disjointed.

99% of radio media slants waaaay right, and their non-stop mantra of "republican is the ONLY way, vs democrats are always wrong/evil/silly/depraved/ridiculous/laughable/etc" is a BIG problem for our nation.

TV media is CORPORATE, so even if they offer up the occasional "liberal voice", those voices are drowned in a sea of right-leaning "guests/hosts" of all the rest of it.. Even the choice of news stories they offer, leans right.

The exclusion of voices is glaringly obvious. Until the recent implosion, Krugman was rarely consulted. He has been more visible, but in very constrained settings, and often critiqued before and after his stints...along with the usual "leftie" rhetoric, followed by lavish doses of guffaws and giggles.

Media is only NOW even starting to show us some of the people we needed to be hearing from all along. The mess is so awful, and the situation so dire, that they have finally started to bring in oppositional voices. Of course these people are quite willing to remind us all that they have been warning us for decades about the situation we find ourselves in, but to many people, these "new guests" are totally new to them, because they have been shut out for so long.

The situation we find ourselves in is so desperate, that even these real experts may not be able to un-do the damage..Diagnosing a terminal condition is no substitute for preventative care, years earlier.

Imagine if we had had these people on tv-radio for 20 years:

Glenn Greenwald, instead of Rush Limbaugh
Phil Donahue, instead of Sean Hannity
Thom Hartmann, instead of Glenn Beck
Bill Moyers, instead of Bill O'Reilly
Maria Hinajosa, instead of Laura Ingraham


there are many more, but those come to mind, immediately..









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is the GOP getting s-s-scared?
For years, and to Progressives' detriment, we've ignored Rush Limbaugh or not taken him very seriously. Well, Rush has finally gotten what he wants: To be noticed and taken seriously. In fact, we're taking him so seriously, we've made him the public face of the Republican party. Whatever he says, whatever he does, we're imputing that to the GOP. When he spouts off that he wants Obama to fail, we're saying that's the voice of the Republicans.

And the Republicans are saying, "Uh oh."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fornax Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Limbaugh
Really I am so tired of him gettin free airtime with all the networks when he pulls these antics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Welcome Underground Fornax
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerryster Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Welcome to DU!
Of course you may not be a newbie, just changed your user name. If so, hey, Welcome anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. And a very good tactic it is.
Putting him in the spotlight not only shines a bright light on the ugliest of the ugly for the whole world to see it also has the effect of taking attention away from other,slightly less insane pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely true! On the other hand, this cerebrally-challenged, disgusting man is the biggest thing
the GOP has going for it. And the GOP and Wall Street and the evangelicals are in bed with one another. That's why that pig is still on the air. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. There is no such thing as free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Armed Forces Radio still carries Limbaugh's show, doesn't it?
How hard should that be to change?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rec # 4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am familiar with most of your list except 1, but ANYONE instead of Laura Ingraham. barf.
What a beautiful world it would be!


Glenn Greenwald, instead of Rush Limbaugh
Phil Donahue, instead of Sean Hannity
Thom Hartmann, instead of Glenn Beck
Bill Moyers, instead of Bill O'Reilly
Maria Hinajosa, instead of Laura Ingraham

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. Problem: You can't make fun of Limbaugh.
Al Franken tried with his book of the famous name. Didn't do much.

The problem is that you can't make fun of Limbaugh. He's already a ridiculous figure. He has taken steps so that he never has to encounter reality. Hell, he was brought up on charges of drugs, and there were pretty good allegations of him renting foreign male children for sex. He's still talking.

You would have to literally pull him out of his studio, away from his security guards, and into the light of day to make people see how incompetent and ridiculous he is. And at this point, it would take God to do it, because only God can lift anything as fat and lethargic as Limbaugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. Restore Local Voices And Control Of The Airwaves...
One great things we DO have that the right wing has never figured out is the Internet. While hate radio is one way propaganda, the Internet not only brings a diversity of people and information around the corporate media filter, it allows people to network and dig further and expose wider a lot of things that the corporate media ignored.

Rushbo is an actor...an "entertainer"...a stalking horse...a mouthpiece. That's his public personna. What we know of the private Rushbo involves late night "pick-ups" at the local pharmacy and trips to the Dominican Republic. He's not given the "golden microphone" by his shear personality, but by a corporate radio power elite that saw hate radio as a way to quick ratings and revenue without the expense of having local talent. Hate radio was one of the last refuges of a medium that had lost anyone under the age of 35...a small but vocal minority that voted and were the bread and butter of the repugnican hate machine. It was a perfect "marriage" of convenience.

The saving grace is after all these years, there's very little new or inspiring about Rushbo. He doesn't attract people...if anything he's become a liability. One could say he cost the GOOP the House in '06 with his attack on Michael J. Fox (surely helped in the Missouri Senate race) and that he and his "dittoheads" couldn't get their favorites...Thompson and then Rudee nominated...and having to support a man that he had bitterly chastized...McCain. It hasn't been a fun ride for Rushbo as of late.

The world is changing, the nation is changing and the media will change as well...or lose audience and relevence. With the collapse of the corporate media empires, there will be opportunities for Progressives and Liberals to fill the void...to take back what remains of the airwaves and continue to exploit and dominate the growing online world.

Rushbo and his ilk are soooooooooo 20th Century...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Optical.Catalyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. Rush Limbaugh led the Republicans to defeat in 2006 and 2008
The gap tooth followers of Limbaugh are following his fat rear end off of a cliff. Let them GO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. Can you direct me to what Michael Steele said?
I wholeheartedly agree with what you wrote. I simply missed what Steele said (probably intentionally, as I'm not paying attention to him...lol).

Thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baikonour Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. Moyers may not have a primetime cable talk show
But he's still one of the most respected men in the business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. Give him the sunshine treatment!
Pretending Rush didn't matter never worked - why ignore a problem as big as he is?

We need to challenge him. If anyone really believes that only a few people listen to him, they're not paying attention.

I love your suggestions and I wish they could get some/more airtime ASAP.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Ding! Ding! Ding!
That's why I think Obama was so smart to make Limpballs the de facto leader of the rethuglican party. Make Limpballs come up with an effective plan for the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. If Rush Limbaugh claims that his show is his opinion only, I think that would
be a step in the right direction. If he claims most of it is fiction he made up and that he does no fact checking, that would be the second step. Then and only then would I say that he has gained his right to free speech. What he actually does is propaganda and I think there was a time that this could be fined or at least frowned upon unless it was labeled as such or as advertising. Also, worse than other voices out there being in short supply, there are markets where he is carried simultaneously on several stations because Clear Channel owns them all and supposedly can do that. The time for some sensible regulations has arrived as to exactly what programers can and cannot do and how many radio outlets can be owned by one corporation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's all about ratings and advertising
If everyone stopped listening to him and stopped buying the products advertised on his show it would all be over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC