Good to see that, at least, a few voices are opposing more war.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090208/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_afghanistan;_ylt=Ah6pnC_xc6Tpe7hnQRQsKeZI2ocA While increasing the military's focus in Afghanistan was anticipated—it was a cornerstone of Obama's campaign—many Democrats acknowledged in recent interviews that they are skittish about sending more troops, even in small numbers.
The concern, they say, is that the military could become further entrenched in an unwinnable war on their watch.
"Before I support any more troops to Afghanistan, I want to see a strategy that includes an exit plan," said Rep. Jim McGovern, a Massachusetts liberal who at one point wanted to cut off money for the Iraq war.
Added Wisconsin Democrat Sen. Russ Feingold, another fierce war opponent: "The idea of putting the troops in without having more clarity at least gives me pause."
The Obama administration is in the midst of a sweeping strategy review. The results of that assessment might not be released for several weeks. In the meantime, the administration is expected to approve an immediate request from the top military commander in Afghanistan for three more brigades, roughly 14,000 troops.
It is expected that more troops would follow, eventually doubling the presence from 33,000 to 60,000.