Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US military using Britain's atomic weapons factory to carry out research denied them here at home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 07:24 PM
Original message
US military using Britain's atomic weapons factory to carry out research denied them here at home
Edited on Sun Feb-08-09 07:30 PM by bigtree
Monday 9 February 2009

The US military has been using Britain's atomic weapons factory to carry out research into its own nuclear warhead programme, according to evidence seen by the Guardian.

US defence officials said that "very valuable" warhead research has taken place at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston in Berkshire as part of an ongoing and secretive deal between the British and American governments.

The Ministry of Defence admitted it is working with the US on the UK's "existing nuclear warhead stockpile and the range of replacement options that might be available" but declined to give any further information.

Last night, opposition MPs called for a full parliamentary inquiry into the extent of the collaboration at Aldermaston and campaign groups warned any such deal was in breach of international law. They added that it also undermined Britain's claim to have an independent nuclear weapons programme and meant British taxpayers were effectively subsidising America's nuclear programme.

The US president, Barack Obama, while on the campaign trail said he wanted to eliminate nuclear weapons and that one of his first actions on taking office would be to "stop the development of new nuclear weapons". But the Pentagon is at odds with the president. The defence secretary, Robert Gates, and other senior officials argue that the US's existing arsenal needs to be upgraded and that would not constitute "new" weapons.

Kate Hudson, of CND, said: "Any work preparing the way for new warheads cuts right across the UK's commitment to disarm, which it signed up to in the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. That this work may be contributing to both future US and British warheads is nothing short of scandalous."

read: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/feb/09/us-uk-atomic-weapons-nuclear-power


The Pentagon under Bush was a rogue government operating outside the boundaries set by our Legislature. The holdovers in the Pentagon have been pressing ahead with these Bush-era constructions as if the administration-reversing election hadn't just taken place.

"That this work may be contributing to both future US and British warheads is nothing short of scandalous."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. "any such deal was in breach of international law" - YEAH, like the USA respects International Law
.
.
.

Iraq attacked the USA - so the USA invaded and occupied Iraq

(did I miss something?)

President Obama has to walk softly or he'll end up like JFK

Great country that USA

THUGS

THEY KILL THEIR BEST LEADERS

Watch and learn

I was in grade 8 when they killed John Kennedy

USA is run by thugs

USA is the "Hole in the Wall" of the World - more weapons and evil than the rest of the World combined

BASES in over 100 other countries!

USA nomba one - yeah

we'll see . . .

say China and Russia

dey's a'watchin'

you betcha!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the December 2009 expiration date of the current strategic arms (START) treaty with Russia
. . . and the requirement by Congress that Obama conduct a Nuclear Posture Review by the end of the year . . .

In addition, Sec. of State Clinton said during her confirmation, the administration intends to strengthen the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and submit the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty to the Senate for ratification.

I expect all of that will require a focus and commitment to 'international law'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. .



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. morning
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC