Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

7 U.S. states borrowing to pay jobless benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:39 AM
Original message
7 U.S. states borrowing to pay jobless benefits
NEW YORK, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Seven U.S. states have been forced to borrow from the federal government to cover the rising cost of unemployment benefits, the National Conference of State Legislatures said on Friday.

Michigan already owes the government more than $1 billion, the bipartisan organization said in a statement.

The other states that have been forced to borrow are California, Ohio, New York, South Carolina, Indiana and Kentucky.

"Kentucky is in dire straits," said Brent Yonts, chair of the NCSL Labor and Economic Development Committee and representative for Kentucky.

"We've got to look at the whole system because the whole system is collapsing, just like everything else."

Kentucky's jobless rate stands at 7.8 percent, above the national average of 7.6 percent released in a government report earlier Friday.

Fourteen states have jobless rates that exceed 7.6 percent, with Michigan, Rhode Island and Puerto Rico showing rates higher than 10 percent.

"No one anticipated this type of increase that would put such a strain on state unemployment systems," said Diana Hinton Noel, a labor analyst for the NCSL.

States pay for jobless benefits by levying payroll taxes on employers. These are deposited into the federal Unemployment Trust Fund, which keeps separate accounts for each state, plus the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Individual state accounts are fast dwindling as job losses shrink payroll tax revenue.

The Department of Labor earlier reported that 598,000 jobs were lost in January. More than 3.5 million jobs were lost in 2008 and more than 11 million Americans are unemployed.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=13356

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unemployment is at 9.6% in SC, and Gov. Sandford didn't want to take the money.
In addition, he stated on CNN yesterday that he's against the bailout/stimulus programs, that we should just let everything fail, even though it would be "painful".

Easy for him to say. It won't be painful for him, he's a multi-millionaire. Just got to love these hyper-religious, rich people advocating economic collapse for the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. People still trying to pay their loans on fake housing prices.
The actual value of houses needs to be redressed on a house by house basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. OK -- so the plan is working
This was the GOP plan all along. Pretty soon, the states won't even be able to borrow and they'll have to cancel unemployment benefits. Then, people will be willing to work for $4 an hour with no benefits, just to be able to eat. And employes won't complain about anything, because they don't want to jeopardize even the $4 an hour.

This is what Grover Norquist and the corporatists wanted . . . and with the help of the GOP, the corporate media, and some compliant Dems, they're getting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Can we just stop foreign aid for a few years? Cause this is horrible.
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Halving our military expenditures would have a bigger impact.
Some really hard decisions need to be made - dispassionately, analytically and logically.

Unfortunately, military spending seems to be yet another third-rail subject. It'll take the Republics and CorporoDems about a minute to begin calling anyone who would dare propose such cuts "Un-American" or even "traitorous", despite the fact that our military spending is completely out of control, and has been for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC