|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
.... callchet .... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 09:50 AM Original message |
Poll question: Raising taxes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. if you're saying no taxes on the first 50K- that's insane. it would never pass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
.... callchet .... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 09:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Tough battle but they did it the other way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 10:06 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. who did what the 'other way'...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
.... callchet .... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. In 1944 and 1945 the highest tax rate was 94%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 09:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. exempting the first 50K gives a 100% break to the lower classes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. Phase out at about $25~30K, progressive to 25%@ 100k, straight line to 80%@250k and above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
.... callchet .... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 09:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I would really rather have the $250 k and under have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 10:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I'm flexible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
.... callchet .... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. My plan has it phasing out at $50K. Under 50k would pay nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
6. You aren't specifying what type of tax you are talking about. There are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 10:06 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Capital gains is just income by another name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 10:10 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. If it is taxed at a different rate, it is different. Should it be different or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
9. Only if the money is used to help the lower classes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
11. It is one of the most important things we have to do in order to correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
14. Yes, raising taxes on 250K+ is a good idea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
.... callchet .... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 05:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. In 1944 and 1945 it was 94% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 05:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I'm aware of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
.... callchet .... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 05:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. It will save the USA and get us out of debt, let us compete on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
15. I question whether phasing out taxes on the bottom 70% of taxpayers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
.... callchet .... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 05:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. There is plenty of money at the top to pay for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 07:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. I'm pushin' 50. I don't remember a time when 70% of taxpayers were exempt. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
.... callchet .... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
19. The middle and low class have taken such a beating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-09 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
22. Capital Gains is the place to start - that is where George Bush gave millionaires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC