Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow---The Media has ADD(attention deficit disorder)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:50 PM
Original message
Wow---The Media has ADD(attention deficit disorder)
They are in so much "pain". sarcasm "Obama talked too long--his
ansers were too long."

The poor dears cannot figure out how to deal with an articulate
thoughtful president.

I have often wondered 'what is their problem?" Now I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who didn't see that coming?
:silly: I actually enjoyed his long and thoughtful answers. It was refreshing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. They lost an intellectual peer with Bush. Now they have to deal with a Titan.
The president is much smarter than they are...how can they do their jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Their jobs have been to make silk purses from sows ears for 8 years
It's going to take them a while to dust off their mothballed intellect and think for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think the whole country was dumbed down....
the last 8 years (and arguably during most Republican administrations). We tend to reflect our leaders, "hey, it's ok to be dumb. It's cool."

Now it's a new game in town. It's cool to be smart. Almost like having The West Wing back....but better....way better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. self - delete
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 11:31 PM by 2Design
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. "mothballed intellect"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great point
I heard Keith O, Chris Matthews and Rachel M bemoaning the 7 minute answers and I just thought to myself, "are they f***cking crazy? We have a president who can answer a question, period and plus he can answer articulately and I think they're underestimating people's ability to focus for 7 minutes. I guess all those years of W have taken their toll on MSM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. I heard that as well, but I didn't think
I didn't think KO, Rachel and Tweety were 'bemoaning' the length of his answers, sounded more like KO was wondering if longer, more thoughtful answers were going to fly over the heads of the press corps.

Maybe I heard it wrong....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. The media has AD.......oh, look, a kitteh!
They're never going to be happy. Obama talks too much, Bush couldnt speak English. Whine, whine, whine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not long answers
Long discussions of things around question to avoid actually giving an answer. Helen's a was a clear example.

I am in minority at DU. I posted back during the early debates about Obama talking all around issues.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Duhbya's directness must have been refreshing, then. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. duzy
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. sorry you were not able to follow those intelligent answers
some things can not be answers but he was so much more intelligent and direct and truthful than any president in the last 30 or 40 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Perfectly capable of following the answers, while still remembering the question
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 10:54 PM by unc70
Of course Obama is much better than W, but that is not a great standard. I think that Obama would be much more effective if he stopped when he had made his point, rather than to continue talking and bringing in every thing even somewhat related to main point he is making. While some cases such as Helen's question about nukes in the ME were obvious efforts to avoid the question. More often, he seemed to be "filling the air" almost like running out the clock.

Maybe I am spoiled by having had the luck of being taught by several excellent teachers and find Obama only fairly good.

Bill Clinton was better in these situations, improving over time. I hope Obama will become more concise. I will be curious how many viewers stuck with the N C after a couple of long answers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. I disagree and think he trys to give all possible answers to vague
questions - I find I do the same thing - you are guessing what the question really is about - and it is not a conversation but an answer - so he covers all points so that ANYONE with a similar question can understand - with bush there was only one answer -rw ideology
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Obama is/was very direct. Its so refreshing. After shrub.
I don't agree that he talks around issues. He answered Helen's first question and her second, moved on as she came back for thirds. I love Helen, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. If Israel having nukes is a state secret,
is Obama free to talk about it to Helen Thomas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. I call it ADHD...(wait for it)....
attention deficit high-definition disorder

:silly:


Apologies to the sufferers of real ADHD (hyperactivity).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. They are in shock. They don't know how to handle an intelligent Prez after the last 8 years.
Obama spoke directly to the American people tonight and the MSM was the odd man out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Tell me they didn't really complain about that.
Please?

I only heard the press conference, not the spin aftermath...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Not just the media, but also some posters here on DU.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Intellectual lightweights
they're gonnna need some remedial catching up after the Bush years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. we have one in this thread complaining - doesn't understand thorough answers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonycinla Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Good News,Bad News
The good news is that Obama is intelligent,thoughtful,articulate ,civil,cerebral,sincere,serious and ERNEST if nothing else.The bad news for the press,especially media press,political junkies of all sorts,talking heads ,talk show hosts,interviewers etc. is that he is going to be too much like a college professor and lecturer and unbearably BORING as time goes on.You read it first here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yeah, we need to get back to the good ol' days when we had an EXCITING president
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 11:15 PM by Wednesdays
You mean Raygun, I'll bet...or how about Dubya? Now that was exciting!

Just think...we might have had Sarah for our prez, instead of this boring dude we had on tonight. Excitement! Whee!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Ha! I kept thinking 'it could have been President Palin' talking
and how horrible the pain of that press conference would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. But he didn't
mispronounciate anything. How're the MSM supposed to earn their checks if they can't spend 30 minutes explaining what they think he said? And what are they to do when a President's statements are clearly understood? No wonder they fawn over Palin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC