Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Farts of Compromise; Hacking the Stimulus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:07 AM
Original message
The Farts of Compromise; Hacking the Stimulus
The Farts of Compromise; Hacking the Stimulus
Old Politics Undercuts the New as the Senate Reverts to Horse Trading

by Danny Schechter
It became clear Friday night that our economy may not recover until our politics do.

To President Obama, the delays and endless Congressional carping about his recovery plan was "inexcusable." He was reduced to reading the latest unemployment numbers aloud as if to say, ‘what world are you guys in?

"Last month, another 600,000 Americans lost their jobs," Mr. Obama said. "That is the single worst month of job loss in 35 years. The Department of Labor also adjusted their job loss numbers for 2008 upwards, and now report that we have lost 3.6 million jobs since this recession began."

<snip>

With Rahm Emmanuel brokering compromises and chipping away at the solid wall of Republican bluster, the Dems gave up some of Obama'a promised middle class tax breaks in a bill downsizing government spending-which is, as the president noted, what a stimulus is. In the end, GOP favored tax cuts made up 42% of the measure, roughly proportional to the number of seats they hold. This was politics, not principle, at work.

To get the deal, here's part of what the Obamacrats sacrificed:

* $40 billion State Fiscal Stabilization
* $16 billion School Construction
* $1.25 billion project based rental
* $2.25 billion Neighborhood Stabilization (Eliminate)
* $1.2 billion in Retrofitting Project 8 Housing
* $7.5 billion of State Incentive Grants
* $3.5 billion Higher Ed Construction (Eliminated)
* $ 100 million FSA modernization
* $50 million CSERES Research
* $65 million Watershed Rehab
* $30 million SD Salaries
* $100 million Distance Learning
* $98 million School Nutrition
* $50 million aquaculture
* $2 billion broadband
* $1 billion Head Start/Early Start
* $5.8 billion Health Prevention Activity
* $2 billion HIT Grants
* $1 billion Energy Loan Guarantees
* $4.5 billion GSA
* $3.5 billion Federal Buildings Greening.



<snip>

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/02/09-3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. bipartisanship = repubs still in control while dems dishonor their values nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. * $3.5 billion Federal Buildings Greening.
Why would anyone not want to make Federal building more energy efficient? Can't be the cost, it is less than we spend in two weeks for Iraq. What can be their rationale? I am really interested in their thought process on this one..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Senate Dems were rolled by Rahm
to cut even more. Rahm deserves a place in the new urban dictionary.

Rahm-
noun, common - a closet Republican.


Bipartisan Deal Eases Way For Stimulus Bill in Senate
Compromise Sets Up Tough Negotiations With House


Obama endorsed the moderates' effort and brought its leaders -- Sens. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) -- to the White House to discuss their proposed cuts. White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel attended the final meetings in Reid's office last night to work out lingering differences. Before Emanuel arrived, Collins said, Democrats were advocating $63 billion in cuts. "Then Rahm got involved, and a much better proposal came forward," she said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/06/AR2009020602097_pf.html

Aid to Low-Income Families Total

▼$26,955,100,000

Aid to States Total

▼$37,660,000,000


more-- good side by side chart
Link: http://www.propublica.org/special/the-stimulus-bills-house-vs.-senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC