|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
yodoobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:34 PM Original message |
Is Wallstreet conspiring against Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oh please.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I don't mean this as a conspiracy nonsense post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. With all these dismal earning reports you still think the market should be going up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. I thought the Dow was tanking because of Geithner saying what he wants to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. TARP, not stimulus. What Geithner wants to do with the rest of the TARP, not the Stimulus (Recovery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. that's what I meant. the remainder of the 750 bil from a few months ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. the very wealthy have been stalling the inevitable so they can STEAL all the money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. and they have accomplished their goal of stealing too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. You've got to be kidding me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Yes but their ability to make money is now limited to $500k/yr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. No, their salary is limited to 500k/yr. (debateably) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
7. no -- they are conspiring against anything that isn't corporate welfare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
8. They dont want oversight of the billions more they were expecting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. No it was idiot Geitner speaking today that moved the market |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. He hurt the Dow, no doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. S&P is only 3pts lower than it was when Geitner shut his mouth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Well, I doubted the Geitner pick from the beginning, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
27. I need to find a video of this Geitner speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
14. It like they're holding their breath until they turn blue......they know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sattahipdeep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. New? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
17. No, against America, just as they have been for our whole lives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
18. I wouldn't put it past them. They tried to stage a Fascist coup against FDR after all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
19. It would seem what upset Wall Street was the lack of detail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
22. Wallstreet is simply responding to that atrocious "Caylee" memorial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lifesbeautifulmagic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
23. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
25. No n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
26. They might have to actually hire people back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. And what exactly in this stimulus bill requires them to hire people back? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I mostly meant the corporations they invest in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
28. First of all, the salary caps are voluntary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
30. Nobody is more surprised than they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
specialed (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-10-09 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
32. Transparency and Accountability.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC