Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RE: Stimulus $15,000 credit for buying a house- so I sell my house to my son and I buy his &

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:12 PM
Original message
RE: Stimulus $15,000 credit for buying a house- so I sell my house to my son and I buy his &
we end up with $30K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeah if you are greedy
but I hope not.

it's for 'first time' homebuyers IIRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. it is not limited to first time home buyers
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 04:17 PM by jsamuel
for the senate version.

I think it should be for 1st timers. It seems like people could take huge advantage of it otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. ooo really??? its not for first time buyers?
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 10:59 PM by Cash_thatswhatiwant
hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Actually I think I read it will be for all homebuyers who buy a home within a certain time period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The OP is correct for the Senate Version, You are right for the House Version n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I can only imagine the same Repugs who hated this stimulus package falling
All over each other as they attempt to sell each other their houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. ....and creating the next housing bubble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I looked for information and couldn't find any. I wouldn't do this, just used the scenario
with my son. Looks like there could be loopholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Minus closing costs, attorney fees, capital gains et. al
Sure you may walk out with a few bucks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. OP's scheme avoids most of the costs.
This is a stupid use of stimulus money. Throwing handfuls of money on the street is dumb. How about investing our tax money in real useful things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. I bet this is taken out of the bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It should be taken out. The fucker that proposed (Isakson) it voted against the bill anyways.
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 04:21 PM by Dawgs
It was always a stupid idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Johnny Isakson?
Yeah, he's a Georgia good ole boy and he is a frigging CROOK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. I totally agree b/c if there is a 'loophole' to be found, those
fuckers will find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. Sounds like its going to be cut back
Baucus had said earlier that $35.5 billion to provide a $15,000 homebuyer tax credit, approved in the Senate last week, would be cut back. There was also pressure to reduce a Senate-passed tax break for new car buyers, according to Democratic officials, while a $40 billion reduction in aid to states appeared likely to stick.

A provision limiting compensation for top executives of companies receiving federal bailout assistance appeared likely to be dropped altogether because of an unanticipated $11 billion budget cost. The officials who disclosed details of the talks did so on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to discuss them.

The White House weighed in strongly to try to resurrect funding for school construction eliminated during Senate dealmaking last week, a Democratic official said, but seemed resigned to limiting aid to the states for local school budgets to the $39 billion approved by the Senate on Tuesday by a 61-37 vote.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090211/ap_on_go_co/congress_stimulus;_ylt=Apdpbp2vSBVQHLG3imw3FTOyFz4D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. You have to live in the house.
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 04:28 PM by peace13
So you would have to move, not just own the thing.

Edited to add This is not a $15,000 rebate. It is a decrease in your income that lowers your taxs. You subtract $15,000 from your income and pay tax on that amount. I believe that you can spread it out over several years but not sure on that one. For example if I make $50,000 and buy a house, when I do my Federal income tax I subtract $15,000 from $50,000 and pay income tax on $35,000 for that year. If I make $35,000 it may not make sense to use the entire $15,000 credit in one year due to tax brackets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. I didn't know you had to live in the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. I thought this credit was fully refundable.
ie, you get the $15,000 after whatever your tax liability is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. Do you feel you will owe fifteen thousand in taxes?
If so then it may benefit you to do that. If you don't need the tax writeoff then it probablt won't. You don't get a fifteen thousand dollar check you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. My thoughts exactly.
I've never paid $15,000 in taxes in a year. And I'm in my 50's, and have always had a decent paying union job, with lots of overtime.

More subsidy for rich fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. but
You can take the deduction over a 2 year period. What % of people pay $7,500 in taxes? A lot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Except that state taxes would probably eat up more than each $15,000. Don't you know that
we little people cannot game a system, no matter how it might seem.

If this goes through, you can bet there will be regs to prevent what you suggest - at least for those with homes worth less than a million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoenix-Risen Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Don't most states
base their income tax on your Federal AGI?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. She or he is likely referring to sales taxes
Houses are subject to sales tax just like any other purchase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoenix-Risen Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
37. I didn't know that
I'm only familiar with Arizona and Minnesota and there is no sales tax on home sales there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlyhippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. I am not a first-time homebuyer, do I get in on this?
Actually, my mortgage is about as much as a new luxury car, not a decked out one, probably a toned down one, and my interest is 5%, I don't know if I wanna give up my house..I think I am pretty set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. It benefits Developers who have over-built subdivisions....
That are losing value and aren't selling. They need to re-capture their market at a more profitable price, so REPUBLICANS are giving them help in the Jobs Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. exactly....and the bad version just benefits flippers and developers, the benign version
only gives the tax credit to first time buyers....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. Meh.
Mens rea. Scamming always causes problems. Surely someone thought about that :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Of course. The conclusions people leap to, without reading the exact wording...
... is a large part of how the subprime/ARM debacle happened in the first place.

Good to see that we've learned oh-so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Does the op have it wrong here as I have not read it. There was a caller to Shadegg who was
all hot about it because she wanted to apparently make money off real estate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Hell if I know, I haven't read it... Which is why I'm not making shit up...
about what's possible and not possible according to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Word, but that caller was all drooling over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. (shrug) Americans drool over all sortsa stupid shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. `Could even swap back again too. wash-rinse-repeat
But you could pull that deal off half a dozen times in a year

and then share a cell in prison with your son for conspiracy to defraud the Govt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
8 track mind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. I would prefer $15000 credit to buy a new car.
I would be at the dealership instantly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. that's the version Krugman condemned...he says 15K to FIRST TIME buyers is benign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC