Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are House Democrats balking at stimulus bill agreement?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:27 PM
Original message
Are House Democrats balking at stimulus bill agreement?
Are House Democrats balking at stimulus bill agreement?

By David Lightman | McClatchy Newspapers


Senators negotiating a final compromise economic stimulus package said the House of Representatives and Senate agreed Wednesday on a $789.5 billion package that scales back tax breaks for new car and home buyers while restoring some cuts in state education aid and health care.

But after the announcement, a joint conference committee meeting scheduled for 3 p.m. was postponed after House Democrats did not show up.

Senators said they still expected an agreement later Wednesday, and it was unclear that the agreement had run into difficulties. Senate staff members said the delay was merely to allow House members who had been expected to oppose some aspects of the Senate bill to express their feelings privately.

According to Senators Ben Nelson, D-Neb., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, key moderates who helped craft the agreement, the new bill includes $54 billion for education, less than $79 billion House members had wanted and more than the $39 billion senators approved.

The new bill has no money for school construction, increases to $90 billion the amount of money that would be sent to states to help pay Medicaid costs, and also increases to $49.6 billion the amount of money that would be devoted to infrastructure projects.

The total cost would be well below the measures passed by both the Senate, whose price tag was $838 billion, and House, at $819 billion.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/61963.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. So... what else was cut??????
Low-income housing, no doubt!

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. no money for school construction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And what else? There were more cuts than that.
Yet, we were told "it's not over.. have hope".

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnrepentantUnitarian Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Maybe none for SC anyway.
After all, our gov Mark Sanford (R) here says we don't want the stimulus money. Meanwhile, remember that school that Pres. Obama was talking about...circa 1850's, by the railroad, etc.? Gov. Sanford, you don't speak for this state. Yes, we need the school money, not to mention the road money (caved-in and potholed roads everywhere = safety hazards), the rail and port improvement money, etc. Please, nobody listen to our governor! He's clueless.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. It sounds like they are pissed about Reid's quick announcement
He jumped the gun, the House members were looking over the deal when the Senators held the announcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I bet it was on purpose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It is Washington
Of course it was on purpose.

Weather it was to be the first to announce it or to try and guarantee the deal was sealed, either way it was a Washington power move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. There's plenty of votes in the house to pass it....
Obama had a 30 vote cushion to work with.


The key was holding on the at least 2 of the Senate Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. True, but maybe some of the House Dems don't like the final product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Reid screwed up, but he screwed up in a way that something right might happen.
He again jumped the gun and said "WE HAVE A DEAL!!!111!1one" before a deal was made, but instead of stepping on the toes of Republicans and Blue Dogs who would demand more concessions, he stepped on the toes of Pelosi and the House, and they're demanding more school and state money before they sign off on the deal.

Nice to see that one of Reid's fuckups caused something good to happen for a change...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC