Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FutureGen 'Clean Coal' Earmark Removed From Stimulus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 12:41 PM
Original message
FutureGen 'Clean Coal' Earmark Removed From Stimulus
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/futuregen-clean-coal-earmark-removed-from-stimulus.php

FutureGen 'Clean Coal' Earmark Removed From Stimulus
By Elana Schor - February 12, 2009, 12:09PM

Thanks to a reader who sent us the final numbers on what's in and out of the final stimulus bill, we can finally start digging into the substance of the deal that's headed for approval by this weekend. (We have a PDF of those internal numbers for you right here.)

Here's the first thing I noticed: Remember when we told you about the Senate's attempt to sneak in a $2 billion earmark for FutureGen, the Illinois "clean coal" plant? That's been zeroed out in the final stimulus pact.

As strange as this sounds, score one for Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good. There's no such thing as clean coal.
And wind power blows, too.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Never thought I'd see the day when Durbin was the bad guy and Coburn

was wearing the white hat.

But yay! Glad to see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Glad to see this, also the Nuke $50B got axed. Were there any other "clean" coal stims
that snuck by I wonder? Another :applause: K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. I worked for over 20 years at the place that actually funded the FutureGen program
I know the people who thought this program up, I know the people who administer it, I know the people who think this program is the best hope we have for being able to provide for our own energy needs. It does not bother me that the program isn't going to be funded here - what bothers me is that it will still be funded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC