Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So did that 'did not vote' with Judd Gregg on the stimulus package

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:13 PM
Original message
So did that 'did not vote' with Judd Gregg on the stimulus package
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 05:16 PM by malaise
sink him. Maybe Obama told him to go fuck himself after that he recused himself. Actually I hope he did

corrected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. he didn't vote
he made a point of being out of town
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well, in the words of the Church Lady ...
How conveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeenient!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. What 'no' vote? I thought he recused himself, which might be why
he's been getting so much grief from the GOP. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. He did recuse himself
I messed up that OP.

Is it possible that by not voting he was unpalatable to Dems. He should never have been nominated in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, because were he to have been confirmed, he wouldn't have
gotten a chance to vote anyway. I think the rethugs got to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Possible
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seems obvious enough.
Clearly, Obama is willing to surround himself with people of differing opinions in some positions, but not key positions.

Two thumbs for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I'm watching Tweety
and the regular Rushican says Gregg did not like the idea of the census chief reporting to the WH.
Fugg him.

Gregg press conference coming up.
I disagree with Tweety - this is not about philosophy because Gregg must have known the philosophical differences before he accepted the nomination.

Did I say fugg him. Adios.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obama is learning a lesson - bipartisanship doesn't work with Repugs nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. He knows it won't work instantly.
He said as much at his news conference Monday night.

The Prez will keep plugging, keep looking good and the pubs will keep looking like arrogant two-year-olds.

The Pubs will either come along with him on some things or they will disappear.

It's way too early to write off his approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. I HOPE he's learning it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I hope! These people cannot see weakness in anyone - they'll go for the kill
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 09:59 PM by Sarah Ibarruri
Even if it's not real weakness, but just gentleness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. He didn't vote, and it still would have made no difference.
Perhaps they are looking at his Senate seat, and they are making sure he keeps it Republican in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. i'm glad he's gone....they wouldn't know bipartisanship if it bit him on the ass
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 05:20 PM by spanone
so did gregg think President Obama was going to present a republican bill??

FUCK THE REPUBLICANS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Gregg presser coming up now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Says he wouldn't be comfortable
Was he comfortable with Abramoff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. It was a stupid pick anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I agree 100% n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. so, had he been replaced in the senate?
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM by spanone
edit...guess not, he just said he could be more effective in the senate.....nevermind

was he vetted?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. All this crap after Dems agreed to appoint a Rethug
instead of a Dem. Ah fugg him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. i would never reach out to these people again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. The President is clearly a very
patient man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. No more hiring of Republickers names Judd or Jethro or nothing
Just no Republickers period.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC