Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Sheriff attempting to charge Phelps also acquired a .50 Cal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:43 AM
Original message
The Sheriff attempting to charge Phelps also acquired a .50 Cal
S.C. Sheriff's Department Armored Vehicle with Belt-Fed Machine Gun

The Richland County (S.C.) Sheriff's Department has acquired an armored personnel carrier complete with a turret-mounted .50-caliber belt-fed machine gun for its Special Response Team.

Sheriff Leon Lott told the Columbia State newspaper that he hoped the vehicle, named "The Peacemaker," would let the bad guys know that his officers are serious.

"We don't look at this as a killing machine," Lott told the paper. "It's going to keep the peace. We hope the fact that we have this is going to save lives. When something like this rolls up, it's time to give up."

The Peacemaker has a top speed of 30 mph.
http://www.policemag.com/News/2008/03/06/S-C-Sheriffs-Department-Armored-Vehicle-with-Belt-Fed-Machine-Gun.aspx

I can't imagine a realistic scenario in which you need a .50 cal in which M-16s can't handle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. The militarization of our Police has to stop
Who do you think it will be that is our real oppressor when the time comes? It will be the local cop, that's who it will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Exhibit A as to why Sherriff should not be elected
Exhibit B is Joke Arapaio in Maricopa County, Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. i can't believe he is still in charge
I can understand being tough on crime but when it comes to treatment of prisoners and pre-trial detainees he is an unethical. I mean a pregnant woman lost a child because of failure of the staff to take her seriously then blamed the death on the paramedics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sheriff Rosco P. Coltrane lives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Like I've said before, this is a guy who can't kick a duck in the ass
unless he stands on a brick to do it.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. There are legit uses for the armored vehicle, in law enforcement
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 09:54 AM by NJmaverick
since it serves a protective role. The belt fed 50 caliber, on the other hand, is too dangerous to responsibly use in civilian areas. Then again this nut case sherriff went after college kids for smoking pot, so he clearly is lacking in good judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. No there are not.
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 09:52 AM by ThomWV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. You have a sniper situation, with injured civilians or law enforcement
you are unable to reach them, because it requires crossing his field of fire. In a situation like that, an armored vehicle can be a life saver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Horseshit. There is no justification for local police to be armed like this
None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Many urban police departments have armored vehicles -
that's not the problem. It is the weapon that is the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. That was an idiotic response
I am not wasting my time with you. You are far too closed minded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Yes, there is....just probably not anything that guy would be handling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. He wants Phelps
Deputy Dawg went after those kids because he wants to nail Phelps. It was reported that when this asshat arrested several of the suspects his questions were all about Phelps.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I have no problem with the armored car
But a .50 cal is ridiculous. It is very dangerous. The velocity from the bullet is enough to kill you or rip a limb off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. That's not what I worry about if a bad guy is shooting at them.
What I worry about is the .50 cal round punching through the bad guy and then three successive walls and killing Mom standing in the kitchen on the next street over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. That's a valid reason
Though my problem is a .50 cal is excessive to use against a bad guy. A .249 is pretty powerful weapon that could be used if absolutely necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. .50 are sometimes referred to as anti-material (small ones at that)

because the intended use was to stop armored vehicles or destroy some physical object. The Army first used Barret .50 cal rifles in their EOD units to destroy IEDs.

But generally, I agree, its difficult to imagine a Sheriff using one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. I wanted to say that
But I wasn't 100% sure but I did learn from the military that the .50 cal was not originally designed to kill humans but rather destroy objects such as you mentioned. I know it does make an effective sniper rifle because of it's accuracy at long distances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. 1400 meters
I believe is the longest distance for a confirmed kill by a sniper with a .50 Australian dude in Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. 2,430 meters
On that March afternoon in 2002, Cpl. Furlong squinted through the scope of his McMillan Tac-50, a sleek bolt-action rifle almost as long as he is. In his crosshairs were three men, each lugging weapons toward an al-Qaeda mortar nest high in the mountains of eastern Afghanistan. Master Cpl. Tim McMeekin, hunkered behind his fellow sniper, saw the same trio through the lens of his Vector, a binocular-like device that uses a laser to pinpoint targets thousands of metres away. Speaking quietly, both soldiers agreed on the obvious: take out the biggest threat first, in this case the man in the middle carrying the RPK machine gun. According to the Vector, he was exactly 2,430 m away -- nearly 2 1/2 kilometres.

http://www.macleans.ca/canada/national/article.jsp?content=20060515_126689_126689

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Wow
It's been a long time since I read it. 2430 meters. That's crazy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. I've aimed down that McMillan, the scope on it is incredible
I was looking at a building about 200 yards away, and the gutter drain near the ground just about took up the entire FOV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RT Atlanta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. another black eye for Columbia
what is it with those yahoos over there? You have this fuck-stick trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill when there are more serious matters that he should tend to rather than harassing USC students and their friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. Nothing like a nice mellow Sunday drive...
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 09:53 AM by Ellipsis


Here it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. That looks like one of those APCs from the Vietnam War
Is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. ...kinda looks like a M113, don't know, it's the actual one he bought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. ask to shoot it
If I lived there I'd ask to shoot my gun since it was paid for with taxpayer money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
18. Let's see what the International Committee of the Red Cross says about .50 cal ammo
Project of an International Declaration concerning the Laws and Customs of War. Brussels, 27 August 1874.
Means of injuring the enemy
Art. 13. According to this principle are especially ' forbidden ':

(a) Employment of poison or poisoned weapons;
(b) Murder by treachery of individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army;
(c) Murder of an enemy who, having laid down his arms or having no longer means of defense, has surrendered at discretion;
(d) The declaration that no quarter will be given;
(e) The employment of arms, projectiles or material calculated to cause unnecessary suffering, as well as the use of projectiles prohibited by the Declaration of St. Petersburg of 1868;
(f) Making improper use of a flag of truce, of the national flag or of the military insignia and uniform of the enemy, as well as the distinctive badges of the Geneva Convention;
(g) Any destruction or seizure of the enemy's property that is not imperatively demanded by the necessity of war.
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/WebART/135-70013?OpenDocument
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Petersburg_Declaration_of_1868

Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. The Hague, 29 July 1899.
ANNEX TO THE CONVENTION : Regulations respecting the laws and customs of war on land #Section II : On hostilities #Chapter I : On means of injuring the enemy, sieges, and bombardments
Art. 23. Besides the prohibitions provided by special Conventions, it is especially prohibited

(a) To employ poison or poisoned arms;
(b) To kill or wound treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army;
(c) To kill or wound an enemy who, having laid down arms, or having no longer means of defence, has surrendered at discretion;
(d) To declare that no quarter will be given;
(e) To employ arms, projectiles, or material of a nature to cause superfluous injury;
(f) To make improper use of a flag of truce, the national flag or military ensigns and uniform of the enemy, as well as the distinctive badges of the Geneva Convention;
(g) To destroy or seize the enemy's property, unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war.
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/WebART/150-110029?OpenDocument

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_convention

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
28. and just supposing all the officers were made of the best they could be.
What precaustions are made to make sure this thing doesn't fall into the wrong hands...I mean, well organized resistance...or a clever thief can take that thing over.

BEyond that, that thing doesn't just kill...50 cals can freaking jellify/liquify organs from the force they strike with. That's not a peace keeper...it's a weapon of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
30. When the army of invading robots arrive, they'll be ready.
Under what conditions is that safe for civilian (which is what cops are) use? Frankly, I don't like the idea of the police using M16s. The bullets are far too unpredictable in flight once they hit something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. I agree about the M16s
But situations like that north hollywood bank robbery a situation like that is where a M-16 could be useful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
31. Oh great..Barney Fife with a .50 Cal Machine Gun....
.. running around SC arresting people on the basis of a photo.... this country is sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. The guy on the machine gun only gets one bullet.
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 10:31 AM by Ellipsis
which can go through a couple of people ...and then a couple of walls.

The sheriff's ego is on the line. This acquisition ain't going to help him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
34. His dick must be smaller than philboy and Engi say mine is
and that's saying a lot, because they sure do say it's tiny, repeatedly. Without getting suspended or anything. Not that consistency means a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
35. Probably paid for his killing machine with drug forfeiture money. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
36. Sheriff Leon Lott wrote this, in response to our query:
"We need that there machine gun, by gawd. You never do know when a band of dope-smoking hippies is gonna attack. That there .50 calubir machine gun will make short work of them hippies, sure as your born. And then, there's them other undesirables. A shurf don't never know when them undesirables is gonna get all uppity and come out on the street. We'll be redy for them."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
37. Sounds like this out of control barney fife is out to get rid of those longhaired hippies. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC