Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JPMorgan, Citigroup halting foreclosures

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 12:20 PM
Original message
JPMorgan, Citigroup halting foreclosures
JPMorgan, Citigroup halting foreclosures

ALAN ZIBEL | February 13, 2009 12:12 PM EST | AP



WASHINGTON — JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. are halting home foreclosures while the Obama administration develops its plans to help the U.S. housing market.

JPMorgan Chief Executive Jamie Dimon said the New York company plans to halt new foreclosures for owner-occupied home loans through March 6. Dimon made the pledge in a letter to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, who released it on Friday.

Citigroup's foreclosure moratorium applies to all "Citi owned first mortgage loans that are the principal residence of the customer as well as all loans Citi services where we have reached an understanding with the investor" until President Barack Obama's administration has finalized the details of the loan modification program or March 12, whichever is earlier, according to a company release. New York-based Citi's action expands on a similar effort that it started in November.

Frank earlier this week called on the mortgage industry to enact such broad foreclosure moratoriums.

more...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20090213/halting-foreclosures/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I view it as evidence.
I keep hearing claims that only enacted legislation and finalized regulations could possibly be responsible for changes in corporate behavior, even though I distinctly remember otherwise (and even remember thinking that the behavioral changes were unwise). If you can't show a causal relationship between finalized legislation/regulations, you're stuck: Only those things can possibly cause a noticeable behavioral change. Pressure, hearings, threat of change, public perceptions ... all meaningless, a priori (as seen from a decade later).

Then I see things like this, where the threat of legislation or regulations has a strong effect on behavior. Apparently, I have to conclude, this is the first time such a thing has ever happened, and there really *is* something new under the sun.

Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC