Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strike down PROP 8

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 12:54 PM
Original message
Strike down PROP 8
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51179&id=15571-10933385-Dx9KL6x&t=2

Click below to see this beautiful video and sign their letter to the California Supreme Court asking it to strike down Prop 8, reject Ken Starr's case, and let all loving, committed couples marry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have already signed a petition to stop this nonsense of
Ken Starr and his prop 8 harassment toward the marriage of same sex couples. But I'm kicking this so that those who haven't seen this will get a chance to voice their disagreement toward Ken Starr/prop. 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. thank you!!
that's what i was hoping for. exposure for those who want to help.

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Should courts base their judgements based on the number of letter they recieve from each side, or
based on the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. it's a petition to get starr's case thrown out.
the case is that they want to nullify those 18,000 marriages that took place before prop 8 passed.

that's bullshit.

it's never wrong for the public to denounce and cry out against unjust laws. your question doesn't apply here. they're not trying to change the law with this petition, they're trying to protect the rights of those who married legally before the bullshit prop 8 passed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Starr's case may well be null and void.
At the very least, it should not be considered until the CA Supreme Court rules on Prop 8, which will occur within 90 days of March 5.

The attempt by Starr and Co. to push this through seems to me like adding insult to injury, knowing the likelihood of an overturning of Prop 8 by the Supremes, they are hoping to do as much damage as possible before they are defeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Should American citizens sit down and shut up?
I believe it is my right and my duty to speak out when I believe America is doing it wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Of course you have a right to speak out. But do you want a judiciary which bases its rulings on
public opinions? We could just get rid of juries and decide the guild or innocence of the accused by whichever side gets the most text messages. Do we really want an American Idol justice system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. you're right, petitions are such a waste of time.
sheesh, what was i thinking.

:sarcasm:

your argument makes no sense in this context. people should still be heard regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They are not when you are trying to influence legislators and the executive branch
The CA Courts were to follow what the people wanted, they would uphold Prop. 8, as it got a majority of the vote. But you (and I as well) are hoping they will follow the Constitution, rather what is popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. i believe we just found some common ground. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC