|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:02 PM Original message |
I'm sorry, but the Stimulus Package is the most LIBERAL, PROGRESSIVE, KEYNSIAN BILL in decades |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. Greg Palast said on AA that it has the whole Democratic Party platform in it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tigermoose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. Don't be sorry - it's true! What an acheivement for Obama and Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
4. Honestly, DUers and liberals opposing this bill fall into three classes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:09 PM Original message |
Or #4 (which is actually a subset of #1) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Judge much? Some of us don't like some of the compromises |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Personally I'm hoping for several Stim bills |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 03:32 PM Response to Reply #18 |
39. We definitely need one more for education. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. that is the plan. Obama has said clearly that this is a first step. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
32. Some of us don't like *any* compromises. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. It's a Purity issue - if one thing goes wrong they storm the St Petersburg Gates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
42. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 05:00 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. The "glass half empty" folks.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Yeah yeah that's to be expected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. Some economists seem to believe it's not enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:25 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Yes, but if Obama builds credibility with this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Who's to say this has to be the last run? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. I don't know enough about when and how the money is to be used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 04:05 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. I am hoping some of it helps speed up the Bay Bridge Retrofit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 04:21 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. I was sort of hoping the wetlands funds thing was true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 04:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
45. Depends on your definition of "Progressive" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. Meh. They were much more liberal in handing out $ to Wall Street |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Yes they were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Yep. And I heard an economist on Amy' show today say very plainly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. One thing at a time.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Don't you get it? If Obama had to 'fight' for this flaccid thing, what's next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Believing Is Art (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. I'm hoping it's done differently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. That would work too - I just think the main this is that this will not be the only bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
7. when are they going to vote for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Boehner is such a....BONER!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. House to vote very soon. Procedural vote underway now; final vote next - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Maybe you can explain this to me - Didn't they already vote on it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. They voted before it went to conference w/Senate and changes were made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. It makes sense - but does this happen with every bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. I'm not either, lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. If the bills are not identical, they have to, yes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
13. When did the tax cuts cut-off go up to $100,000 / 200,000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
15. Get it through and here's hoping. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
21. i literally teared up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
23. And it's just passed in the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. every fucking republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:27 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. They hate us for our freedom. Remember that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
37. It's FABULOUS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
38. True, but it shows how far standards have dropped since the New Deal n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 03:59 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Sad but true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4 t 4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. T I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
47. The new New Deal has arrived! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
48. So I'm listening to the Senate Republicans whine about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
49. Nothing to be "sorry" about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
50. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 02:36 AM Response to Original message |
51. Thank you for this info...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 02:44 AM Response to Original message |
52. "I'm sorry?" (and for this you're sorry? why?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
53. ...Believe in this guy , he will deliver |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Veritas_et_Aequitas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
54. Wall said. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC