Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm sorry, but the Stimulus Package is the most LIBERAL, PROGRESSIVE, KEYNSIAN BILL in decades

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:02 PM
Original message
I'm sorry, but the Stimulus Package is the most LIBERAL, PROGRESSIVE, KEYNSIAN BILL in decades
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 02:06 PM by Taverner
Not even the Clinton or Carter admins passed anything as LIBERAL as the stim package

To me, the doubling of Unemployment is the icing on the cake. 1 year of benefits now - it used to be 5 months. Who gets a job in 5 months in this economy?

We can bash Obama and Congress all we want, but they created and PASSED the most LIBERAL piece of legislation to clear Congress in years. Honestly, the last time Democrats did this was LBJ.

Let me remind everyone what's in it (on edit):

Health Care

- $87 billion for Medicaid health care coverage for the poor.
- $19 billion to accelerate the use of health information technology systems.

Education
- $53.6 billion in direct aid to states, including $40.6 billion for local school districts, $5 billion in bonus grants for meeting key education performance measures and $8 billion for public safety and other critical services.
- $2,500 annual tax credit for higher education expenses.
- $500 increase in the maximum Pell Grant for low-income college students to $5,350 in 2009 and $5,550 in 2010.
- $13 billion for Title I grants for schools in low-income areas.
- $12.2 billion for special education.
- $2 billion for the Child Care Development Block Grant program to help low-income parents.
- $1.1 billion for Early Head Start and $1 billion for Head Start.

Infrastructure
- $29 billion to modernize roads and bridges.
- $18 billion for clean water, flood control and environmental restoration.
- $8.4 billion for transit.
- $8 billion for high-speed rail.
- $5 billion to upgrade Defense Department facilities, including housing for troops.
- $4.5 billion to make federal office buildings more energy-efficient.

Tax cuts
- "Making Work Pay" tax credit of $400 for single filers earning up to $100,000 and $800 for couples earning up to $200,000.
- Allow low-income families earning as little as $3,000 to qualify for the child tax credit.
- Expands the Earned Income Tax Credit for families with three or more children and increases marriage penalty relief.
- Exempts 24 million taxpayers, for another year, from the Alternative Minimum Tax.
- Revises the $7,500 tax credit for first-time homebuyers by removing the repayment requirement.
- Exempts from federal taxes the state and local sales taxes paid on the purchase of cars, light trucks and SUVs.
- Temporarily exempts some unemployment benefits from income taxes.

Unemployed
- Continues through December 2009 the program that provides up to 33 weeks of extended unemployment benefits.
- $25 increase in weekly unemployment benefits.
- A 60 percent federal subsidy for up to nine months for the cost of continuing an employer's health care coverage after a layoff under COBRA.

Food
- Increase monthly food stamp benefits by more than 13 percent.
- $100 million for emergency food and shelter to help community groups.
^Workers
- $4 billion for job training.
- $2 billion for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program to help communities buy and fix up foreclosed, vacant properties.
- $1.5 billion for the Emergency Shelter Grant program to provide short-term rental assistance and other aid.
- Payment of $250 to Social Security and disability recipients and veterans receiving disability compensation and pension benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs.
- Extends Trade Adjustment Assistance benefits over the next two years for at least 160,000 new workers who lose their jobs because of increased imports or factory shifts to certain foreign countries.

Energy
- $30 billion for a smart power grid, advanced battery technology and other energy efficiency measures.
- $20 billion in tax incentives for renewable energy and energy efficiency over the next 10 years.
- $6.3 billion for energy efficiency in multifamily housing getting federal assistance, such as HUD-sponsored low-income housing.
- $5 billion to weatherize more than 1 million homes owned by "modest-income" families.

Science
- $8.5 billion for programs at the National Institutes of Health, including biomedical research on Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, cancer and heart disease.
- $3 billion for basic research by the National Science Foundation.
- $1.6 billion for the Department of Energy's Office of Science for areas such as climate, biofuels, high-energy physics, nuclear physics and fusion energy.
- $1.5 billion for NIH to renovate university research facilities.
- $1 billion for NASA, including $400 million for climate change research.

Broadband
- $7 billion to expand broadband services to under-served communities.


http://www.13wmaz.com/article/20090212/NEWS04/90212039/1013
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Greg Palast said on AA that it has the whole Democratic Party platform in it
Dream Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigermoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
The final passage of this bill will be enormously good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't be sorry - it's true! What an acheivement for Obama and Dems.
I know there was much rancor back and forth over the specifics but in the end, the bill is close to what Obama wanted in the first place.

Now - let's just hope it works. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Honestly, DUers and liberals opposing this bill fall into three classes
1) Not actually progressives.
2) Those that simply prefer to whine.
3) Total morons that have not educated themselves adequately about the bill, yet speak about it anyway.

I'm open to the idea that there may be another category or two, but I have to say, I'm not sure there are any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:09 PM
Original message
Or #4 (which is actually a subset of #1)
Freeper Trolls trying to stir up shit

I can think of a few who showed their ugly troll faces in the past few days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Judge much? Some of us don't like some of the compromises
that weaken its impact. That being said, it needs to be passed and maybe later some things can be added.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Personally I'm hoping for several Stim bills
One for National Security (real Nat Security - inside the US - bomb detection units at shipyards, etc...)

One with more Education Stim

A Peace Corps Expansion bill (our image abroad is so bad right now)

And definitely something for the folks who used to work in manufacturing....not just job training, but something that PUTS them in LIVING WAGE jobs

And of course, I would love to see the Minmum wage become a Living Wage

But I am happy with this bill, it's already a marked improvement over any bill I've ever seen in my life time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. We definitely need one more for education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. that is the plan. Obama has said clearly that this is a first step. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. Some of us don't like *any* compromises.
As you said, it needs to be passed and it's not like there's no chance to revisit some of the stuff that was left out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. It's a Purity issue - if one thing goes wrong they storm the St Petersburg Gates
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 02:39 PM by Taverner
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. exactly
nothing wrong with compromises... its the compromises that contradict everything else that are upsetting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. The "glass half empty" folks....
And unless I've been misled, there's a nice chunk of corporate welfare in there too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yeah yeah that's to be expected
And the fact that Caterpillar is reneging on the layoffs isn't giving me any faith that they will do anything productive with it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Some economists seem to believe it's not enough.
I think I agree with them. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Yes, but if Obama builds credibility with this one
There will most likely be more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Who's to say this has to be the last run?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I don't know enough about when and how the money is to be used
to know if a "second pass" will be effective or how much it will cost politically. Sometimes you need it all up front. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. I am hoping some of it helps speed up the Bay Bridge Retrofit
That has been dragging on too long!

Say what you will about Mayor Willie Brown, but on his watch he got stuff DONE

(I still like Gavin too, btw)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. I was sort of hoping the wetlands funds thing was true.
lol

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. Depends on your definition of "Progressive"
If it's "Push through an entire spending bill under the auspice of an emergency stimulus bill and act indignant when people suggest that there's WAY too much non-stimulus stuff in it" then yes, I fall under category #1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Meh. They were much more liberal in handing out $ to Wall Street
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes they were
But who was president? Was it Obama? Nope.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Yep. And I heard an economist on Amy' show today say very plainly
that it was too small by 2/3s. He said there were many very admirable inclusions but that it was too small and that the president would have to come back in the Spring or Summer to ask for about double the amount and how hard that would be to do.

Here's the link for people who understand economics better than I do:

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/2/13/robert_kuttner_and_michael_hudson_on

Transcript, audio, video at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. One thing at a time....
I am hoping for, and pushing for a Stim Bill #2, Stim Bill #3

Obama has to build up cred first

If this stim helps, then there will be a sequel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Don't you get it? If Obama had to 'fight' for this flaccid thing, what's next?
Single payer healthcare?

$20 an hour minimum wage?

Nationalized banking system?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Believing Is Art Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. I'm hoping it's done differently
I'd like to see Congress pass a string of smaller, more specific bills that bring the total $ value close to what it should be instead of passing another large stimulus. Doing that would prevent some of the sticker shock, get done more quickly, and help give credence to the stimulus bill once the economy turns around. I'm afraid that going back and asking for one or two more large bills will tarnish the idea that government spending is needed to get the economy back on track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. That would work too - I just think the main this is that this will not be the only bill
Stimulus Bill that is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. when are they going to vote for this.
another thread said Boehner was crying, what a POS he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Boehner is such a....BONER!!!
Couldn't resist...

Yeah, I thought it was supposed to go to vote yesterday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. House to vote very soon. Procedural vote underway now; final vote next -
live on CSPAN if you want to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Maybe you can explain this to me - Didn't they already vote on it?
Or do they have to vote and re-vote on every single revision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. They voted before it went to conference w/Senate and changes were made.
Now they need to vote again and then the Senate will vote again too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It makes sense - but does this happen with every bill?
Of course I am not a CSPAN addict - I should be though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I'm not either, lol.
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 02:18 PM by Avalux
Have a lot of time on my hands since being laid off last week though so I've been following this closely. I don't think re-votes happen on most bills - there were House and Senate versions of the stimulus bill so reconciliation needed to happen, then a re-vote. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. If the bills are not identical, they have to, yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. When did the tax cuts cut-off go up to $100,000 / 200,000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Get it through and here's hoping.
:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. i literally teared up
reading this. i haven't paid enough attention - thank you! no apology necessary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. And it's just passed in the House
Fuck all Rushicans and those seven Dems.
Vote so far:

243 Yea 180 Nah with 9 still to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. every fucking republican
against those they are sworn to serve. jeez i hate the bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. They hate us for our freedom. Remember that.
They would want nothing more than the US to descend into utter chaos, so they can come in on a white horse and "save" us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
37. It's FABULOUS!
(singing) my school won't go bankrupt this year, la la la, my school is going to get some money, la la la.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
38. True, but it shows how far standards have dropped since the New Deal n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Sad but true
Although it is more Liberal than any bill since Great Society legislation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4 t 4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. T I agree with you
completely but how much better was it when it started at 940 million in it's originality before these fuckers got their hands on it ? That's all I'm saying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
47. The new New Deal has arrived!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
48. So I'm listening to the Senate Republicans whine about this.
They said it's one of the largest spending bill ever. Did they forget about the $1.3 trillion dollar giveaway in tax cuts when Bush took office that they are still giving away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
49. Nothing to be "sorry" about.
It is a great achievement.

The United States is a LIBERAL Country.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
50. K&R
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 02:12 AM by Oilwellian
This thread doesn't belong on the 2nd page just yet. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
51. Thank you for this info...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
52. "I'm sorry?" (and for this you're sorry? why?)


jk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
53. ...Believe in this guy , he will deliver
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 12:01 PM by wroberts189
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
54. Wall said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC