Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF? NYTimes: "Stimulus Plan Imposes tougher restrictions on Sr. Exec.s Pay than Obama wanted" ???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:02 PM
Original message
WTF? NYTimes: "Stimulus Plan Imposes tougher restrictions on Sr. Exec.s Pay than Obama wanted" ???
Now I'm really confused. That Cenk video commentary yesterday was saying just the opposite, that some un-named
legislators had gutted the pay restrictions Obama wanted out of the Stimulus Bill at the last minute..

Here's the link to Cenk's rant about this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x271349

So which is it? Now I don't know whether to feel indignant or gleeful.. Someone help me out.


********************************************************
Stimulus Plan Places New Limits on Wall St. Bonuses
By EDMUND L. ANDREWS and ERIC DASH
Published: February 13, 2009

WASHINGTON — A provision buried deep inside the $787 billion economic stimulus bill would impose restrictions on executive bonuses at financial institutions that are much tougher than those proposed 10 days ago by the Treasury Department.

The provision, inserted by Senate Democrats over the objections of the Obama administration, is aimed at companies that have received financial bailout funds. It would prohibit cash bonuses and almost all other incentive compensation for the five most senior officers and the 20 highest-paid executives at large companies that receive money under the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

The stimulus package was approved by the House on Friday, then by the Senate in the late evening.

The pay restrictions resemble those that the Treasury Department announced this month, but are likely to ensnare more executives at many more companies and also to cut more deeply into the bonuses that often account for the bulk of annual pay.

The restriction with the most bite would bar top executives from receiving bonuses exceeding one-third of their annual pay. Any bonus would have to be in the form of long-term incentives, like restricted stock, which could not be cashed out until the TARP money was repaid in full.

The provision, written by Senator Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut, highlighted the growing wrath among lawmakers and voters over the lavish compensation that top Wall Street firms and big banks awarded to senior executives at the same time that many of the companies, teetering on the brink of insolvency, received taxpayer-paid bailouts.

“The decisions of certain Wall Street executives to enrich themselves at the expense of taxpayers have seriously undermined public confidence,” Mr. Dodd said Friday. “These tough new rules will help ensure that taxpayer dollars no longer effectively subsidize lavish Wall Street bonuses.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/14/business/economy/14pay.html?_r=2&partner=rss&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think some are under the impression...
that if we cap CEO's salaries, we'll lose out on billions of tax dollars. I don't believe many of these people even pay taxes, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's why God made Switzerland, the Channel Islands, the Bahamas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I believe you are correct
about the Fat Cats not paying much -- if any -- in taxes.

I'm trying to figure out who I should believe here: Cenk or the NYT.

They seem to be saying the exact opposite of one another regarding whether
there are pay restrictions on CEOs/Exec.s or not in the Stim. Package. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't care who did what as long as those greedy bastards feel the pinch like we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm with you on that one. ~nt~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC