Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Setback for Coleman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:19 PM
Original message
Setback for Coleman
A three-judge panel in the Minnesota Senate race delivered a setback to Norm Coleman this afternoon, ruling that his campaign failed to prove there was an endemic problem counting absentee ballots throughout the state.

The court ruled that judges should use a fairly conservative standard in determining which rejected absentee ballots should be re-introduced into the count. Coleman’s campaign has been arguing that about 4,700 ballots – mostly in Republican-friendly precincts – should be included in the count.

At the end of the recount process, Coleman trailed Democrat Al Franken by 225 votes. Allowing additional absentee ballots into the count has been the crux of the Coleman campaign’s legal challenge to overcome his narrow deficit.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/0209/Setback_for_Coleman.html?showall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Late 2010 Franken joines congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyd921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's what I want to hear!
This whole thing is driving me crazy! These are repuke stalling tactics to make it as difficult as possible for Dem's to get their legislation through the Senate (and require us to water everything down through compromise with repuke "moderates"). You better believe that's what they're up to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is not determined at all. If they count the rest or some, Coleman could still be in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC