Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fallen Soldiers, Coming Home in Public?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ezgoingrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 05:07 AM
Original message
Fallen Soldiers, Coming Home in Public?
Edited on Sun Feb-15-09 05:29 AM by ezgoingrl
My apologies if this has been posted.

*snip*
It was, after all, the embarrassment of a president that first led to the photo ban. In 1989, the TV networks showed a split screen of President George H. W. Bush in jocular banter with reporters on one side while on the other, the first American casualties from Panama were returning to Dover. A veteran himself, Mr. Bush was deeply embarrassed at the juxtaposition and asked the networks to warn the White House when they intended to use split screens again. They declined. At the next opportunity, in February 1991, during the first gulf war, the Pentagon banned photos of returning coffins.

It isn’t clear how much such photos sway public opinion; more than 4,000 coffins have come back from Iraq, largely unphotographed, and public opinion still turned against the war. Of course with photos, that opinion may have turned earlier, particularly in the beginning of the war when Mr. Bush was up for re-election.

“If the American people believe a war is worth fighting, then pictures of returning casualties won’t change anything,” said Ralph Begleiter, a journalism professor at the University of Delaware who prompted the Pentagon to release hundreds of pictures of coffins returning from Iraq. “The problem comes when there are doubts about the war itself.”



http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/weekinreview/15seelye.html?_r=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. This would have made a huge difference back then
and embedded reporters showing the casualties of the populace in Iraq would have also made a difference. People needed to see the truth and still need to see the truth. The Abu Ghraib pictures were one of the reasons people started turning against this sanitized occupation of Iraq. Its long overdue, seeing the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Man, those Bushes sure hate America don't they?
They won't even allow a soldier the tribute they deserve even if they make the ultimate sacrifice! What is it about being a Bush that makes them such cold-hearted bastards? Must be in their genes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. “Dover Test,” an intangible measure of how many coffins Americans can stomach seeing.
The military has explained the ban by saying that it spares a soldier’s loved ones the hardship and expense of going to Dover to be there to greet the arrival along with the news media.

The ban on photography has been applied inconsistently over the years, he pointed out, suggesting to him that “the government is less concerned about the families’ interests and more concerned about controlling the perceptions of war.”



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. That old fart daddy boosh should just eat shit and die
He was "deeply embarrassed" at being shown "in jocular banter with reporters" one one side of split screen while the other side showed coffins of American casualties from Panama. Then the stupid old bastard never should have sent them there in the first place and he sure as hell should not have engaged in jocular banter with anybody while they were there.

Getting somebody else's kid shot may not mean anything to a boosh but despite what they may think it does affect the rest of us. Especially when it's a dumbass war where they are shot in an effort to catch one fucking drug dealer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. BushCo knew we would fail the Dover Test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC