Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did the White House endanger national security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:21 PM
Original message
Did the White House endanger national security
by putting national security type information on the RNC related websites?

Enquiring minds want to know whether people are being investigated and losing their security clearances due to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. every second of every minute of every day
since they seized power

in that way and untold other ways
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would say yes, most definately, but
what do these traitors give a flying fuck about National Security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. which committees would be in charge of looking at this?
Maybe I'll ask them the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Well, I would imagine the NSA, and the Dept Of Homeland Security
for starters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thanks,
I contacted senate Homeland security committee.
Hopefully they'll at least look at the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. like they care?
It's all about power for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I want to attack another part of their fortress
it doesn't matter if they care (which I agree they don't). It's a matter of where they are vulnerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Most likely
But do they give a shit??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. probably not, but we might get more congressional
investigations and completely blow apart the fantasy that they care about national security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tecelote Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Have you seen this post...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. yes, but its asking record keeping not natl security
questions.

I think there's a national security question as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Specifically, why was Karl Rove using non-secure communication
95% of the time?

Did Karl Rove, who has the highest of security clearances, pass along something?

And, more specifically, is communication from/to Karl Rove that's conducted over non-White House servers protected by Executive Privilege?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. not to mention Bolton at the UN was another
using these channels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. No, the GOP is national security. In the new privatized America
the open government is just for show. The real government, the GOP one, runs it's own agenda in secret. I'm sure their network is more secure than the government one. And I'm equally sure that any talk of special prosecutors is just show for the folks. They'll investigate for a few years until interest wanes, and then they'll come up empty or bust the maid. Just like what just happened with Tom Delay the texas cockroach we all used to hate. He left the public eye for awhile, there was an "investigation" and now he's back, just like Newt. You can't get rid of these guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Does a bear shit in the woods? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's not the right question! The correct question is:
How often and how severely has the WH endangered national security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. true enough
I wrote to Feinstein asking her to look into it under her Homeland security duties cause I didn't see an online way to contact that committee directly.

Who else should I contact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC