|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
SidDithers
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 02:27 PM Original message |
Wal-Mart's glow-in-the-dark mystery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whosinpower
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. somebody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Google "Radioactive Boy Scout" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 02:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. David Hahn, the Radioactive Boy Scout |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. That isn't acne on his face. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. What, some WAL MART associate is running all over the world, grabbing signs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. No, they're not. That's patently absurd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. But I heard The Terrorists(tm) will ram it down my throat before detonating it! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. They have millions of cameras in every store and they couldn't catch somebody nicking a large SIGN?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Where I work, there are lots of cameras |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. Theft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Funny story :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RubyDuby in GA
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. My mom worked for Wal-Mart several years ago and she said back then that the cameras were fake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Someone at HQ probably got the word that the signs are a workplace hazard, and they're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Tritium-powered signs aren't toxic. They're used virtually everywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. If one breaks, it's three chest x-rays. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Even assuming that's true, it's a trivial dose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:49 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. It doesn't matter, though. Perception is what rules. To people who don't need chest xrays, three |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. These are in use in every major store. There's estimated to be two million in circulation in the US. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Well, I don't claim to know. It just seems to be an odd story. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 07:53 PM Response to Reply #26 |
37. "What else makes sense?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 06:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
33. It's hell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whoa_Nelly
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. Another reason to never go into Wal-Mart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 03:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. We need ANOTHER reason to avoid WalMart - I thought the list was already long enough! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whoa_Nelly
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. It is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Yeah, I have friends who think Bush was a good president - go figure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
11. This is a little silly and very alarmist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 06:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
35. Oh, I agree completely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-09 11:37 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Warpy and Sid have seen the fnords |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-09 04:13 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I had to look up fnords :)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJazz
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
15. Perhaps the signs contain Trillium......Something Val-uu-able |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
remoulade
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. oops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:47 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. In Michigan, trilliums have an even better value :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
31. Trillian? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldom
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
21. Wait a minute... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. "radioactive" doesn't necessarily mean "a nice bowl of Chernobyl flakes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Even if you did that, it would be a trivial dose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 10:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. If I did all of that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
30. good snippet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 07:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. You're talking about a "bomb" the size of a building, which would STILL have little to no effect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
34. To those who are on the verge of a nervous breakdown over this story... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-09 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
39. AAAAHHHHHH We're all gonna die ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC