Even more reasons to hate insurance companies! Shafting the frail elderly

[Lydia Leftcoast]

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/26/business/26care.html?hp

Mary Rose Derks was a 65-year-old widow in 1990, when she began preparing for the day she could no longer care for herself. Every month, out of her grocery fund, she scrimped together about $100 for an insurance policy that promised to pay eventually for a room in an assisted living home.

Conseco denied long-term-care payments for Mary Derks, who has early-stage dementia, hypertension and diabetes. She bought the policy to avoid burdening her family, but it sold part of its farm-equipment dealership to pay for her care.
On a May afternoon in 2002, after bouts of hypertension and diabetes had hospitalized her dozens of times, Mrs. Derks reluctantly agreed that it was time. She shed a few tears, watched her family pack her favorite blankets and rode to Beehive Homes, five blocks from her daughter’s farm equipment dealership.

At least, Mrs. Derks said at the time, she would not be a financial burden on her family.

But when she filed a claim with her insurer, Conseco, it said she had waited too long. Then it said Beehive Homes was not an approved facility, despite its state license. Eventually, Conseco argued that Mrs. Derks was not sufficiently infirm, despite her early-stage dementia and the 37 pills she takes each day....
****************************
And we want these vultures involved in the health care system... why??

[dflprincess]

1. Sue the bastards

and turn them over to the state insurance commissioner.

[chaska]

2. I worked in that business for a short time. I need a shower every time I think of it.

[ComerPerro]

3. which is exactly why any form of health care that still involves insurance companies won't work

[Lydia Leftcoast]

4. Couldn't agree more, but the corporate enablers in Congress

insist on keeping a role for the insurance companies. :grr: