Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ethanol 'the answer,' auto execs tell Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:48 PM
Original message
Ethanol 'the answer,' auto execs tell Bush
• NEW: President praises Detroit for making "flex-fuel" vehicles
• NEW: Execs say half of vehicles could run on E85 by 2012
• NEW: Environmentalists want more fuel-efficient vehicles

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush, seeking to rev up support for his energy plan, praised domestic automakers Monday for building more "flexible fuel" vehicles capable of running on ethanol and biodiesel blends.

"That's a major technological breakthrough for the country," Bush said. "If you want to reduce gasoline usage like I believe we need to do so for national security reasons as well as for environmental concerns, the consumer has got to be in a position to make a rational choice."

Bush said he appreciated "that American automobile manufacturers recognize the reality of the world in which we live in and are using new technologies to use the consumers different options."

================

Environmental groups said the focus on ethanol blends would undermine attempts to push automakers to make more fuel efficient cars.

"Making our cars and light trucks go farther on a gallon of gas is the single biggest step we can take toward saving American families money at the pump, ending our dangerous addiction to oil, and curbing global warming," said Dan Becker, the Sierra Club's director of the global warming and energy program.

more -

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/03/26/bush.automakers.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Internal combustion is a dead end
much as automakers and the Petroleum Institute want us to believe otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. So then tell me Auto exec, how will they 'SHIP' it since it corrodes the pipelines!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. That still puts us square in the petroleum business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And puts us at risk with higher food prices
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Thanks, I forgot that aspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Only if the question is
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 01:57 PM by Kelly Rupert
"What is the least-efficient 'alternate-energy' motor fuel?"
or
"Which 'alternate-energy' motor fuel would allow the auto industry to roll over production without major redesign costs?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't worry...crops are always stable, and there will never be a drought...
...and...and...we grow lots of sugarcane in the United States...and...and...maybe they'll finally start leveling suburbs and turning them into farmland, instead of the other way around...and...and...

More backward thinking by the most backward thinking group of thugs ever.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wait a second! I thought hydrogen was going to be the "answer"!
Oh, that's right: It's just a shell game and we're the suckers.

Ethanol is a scam just like hydrogen power. We'd be better off building a better mass transit system or a shipload of bike trails.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It's the answer to the question, "How can we distract the American public
long enough to sell them every remaining drop of oil in the earth's crust?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Doesnt it take as many resources needed to produce a gallon of E85 as it does regular gas?
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 02:00 PM by EOO
:shrug:

If so, we may not be coming out ahead here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. The message from the rich, pig Bush power elite is still the same:
"Heads, WE win; Tails, YOU lose."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Humm... well the smart money is in corn futures and secondly cattle futures..
Translation: expect the price to beef to radically increase in the future due to the higher cost of corn.

Play it either way...

MZr7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC