Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is the South so complicated to win in elections?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:29 PM
Original message
Why is the South so complicated to win in elections?
Seriously. According to Gallup(http://www.gallup.com/poll/114073/State-States-Series.aspx), states like Arkansas, Missouri, Kentucky, West Virginia, North Carolina are "Solid Democratic" in terms of voter registration, and Louisiana, Tennessee, Virginia, and Florida are "Lean Democratic", and states like Texas, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, and Oklahoma are competitive. We need to at least attempt to build in the South in states like Texas, Georgia, Mississippi, and South Carolina, where there's a strong minority population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Any thoughts??? Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Conservative Democratic States nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. VA isn't complicated to win.....it's a totally BLUE state!
VA voted for Obama.

VA has two Democratic Senators.

VA, I think, is close to half and half when it comes to the House.

VA has a Democratic Governor.

And, Democrats dominate the state legislature this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm talking about states like Arkansas, Tennesse, West Virginia, and Georgia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Your post said VA "leans Democratic"...not true.....we are now a bright, rich, vibrant BLUE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Only in the Senate, the House has a Republican majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Democratic party has given up on the state of TX. The Texas democratic party works for the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Texas was stolen by KKKarl Rove
He swiftboated Ann Richardson who had a surplus and they quickly drained that and gave Texas a deficit. Texas was very democratic until *co and they redistricted the state so that no democrat could win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Maybe that can change if we can get Texans to see that the Republicans don't do sh!t for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. I'm trying...but be prepared to be crucified if you do.
They can't attack your ideas,so they will smear your name and everything about you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. bastards, aren't they? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Texans need to win only a few more seats
and they will be able to control the redistricting of the state. THis is done very ten years and next year, it's 10!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. We moved to Texas in '99
and I read about the history here and was appalled at what seems to have happened, redistricting, idiocy, etc.

Surely this can be undone? It's know bound to be hard because the republicans here sure are bullies! Ugh!

I'm so thrilled to see so many Obama stickers nowadays, I think a lot of people waited until he won to put them on - but there are still plenty of Bush '04 and W and McCain stickers to go around. I even see "Read my lipstick" stickers; I have to admit I speed up to see the drivers in these cars - I can't believe they'd make that public ...but they're loud and proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Generic Other Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. perhaps southern democrats have not bothered to re-register
as republicans. they are the reagan republicans. that was clearly demonstrated during the last election.
the media spin on reagan republicans for the last 40 years was that they were middle income whites who had been convinced that voting with the rich would increase their own chances of becoming wealthy.
reagan's campaign message was that americans had done enough for the poor and it was time they did something for themselves. the media spin was taken from the latter part of the slogan to mask the fact that those attracted to reagan's message focused on the first part of the statement.
southerners were solidly democratic because lincoln was a republican. it took reagan to convince them that repubs. were on their side.
and one ought to take into account that southern states don't encourage the less affluent to vote. maybe they don't count all of the votes or perhaps they change the tally?
any of these could contribute to he voting/registration discrepancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why is it that only whites are referred to as "southerners"?
And, why does "winning" the south require pandering to them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. It is because the shame of bigotry has to be disguised and the disguises have to be appeased
And I know of no simpler way to say it than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not really all that complicated
Populations with lower educational levels, high religiousity and culturally ingrained "fear of the other" are easy target for propaganda.

Particularly when for all practical purposes- they've been exposed to little else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Race, God, race, guns, race, gays, and race.
Did I mention race?

Tesha

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I see it more as class
and they have been hoodwinked :(

(I'm in Texas)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Legacy holdovers from pre-Civil Rights era
I know plenty of "Democrats" here in NC that would never actually vote for one, but would never change their registration to Republican either. Makes no goddamned sense, but whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baikonour Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. I bet if you looked at the states with the lowest IQs, you'd be able to connect the dots.
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 08:08 PM by Baikonour
Hint: The average IQ in Mississippi is around 90 to 93.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. dems did better than normal in the south
As an example McConnell won in KY with 53% of the vote. In 2002 he won with 65% of the vote. That is something, its about a 24 point change in vote results. I was surprised as hell when Kentucky and Indiana (Indiana isn't southern but you get the point), 2 states that are normally heavily GOP couldn't be called until vote counting had been done for a long time.

Texas will probably be a swing state by 2016 due to younger voters, growth in latino voters, older voters dying off and immigrants from non-northern states who don't share southern values on politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaaaaa5a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. The South was lost to the Democrats over the Civil Rights Movement.
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 08:19 PM by aaaaaa5a
The reason why Democratic registration is high in the south is because older people never bothered to change their registration from years past.

Prior to the 1960s the Democrats controlled the south. People forget that Strom Thurmond was a Democrat for most of his life. In the early part of the 1900's they called the South the "solid block" because it was so solidly in Democratic hands.

Of course the reason it was Democratic territory was because Abe Lincoln was a Republican. And residents in the south turned to the Democratic party in opposition to Lincoln and his policies.

Overtime the two parties (Dems/GOP) changed as younger Democrats came into power in the 1950s and 60s. They were more progressive on racial issues than their predecessors. Many of them (Bobby Kennedy) fought for Civil Rights. And as a result, white southerners began to vote Republican in increasing numbers. When LBJ signed the Civil Rights legislation of the 1960s, he said he was giving the south to the Republicans for generations to come. And sadly he was right.

Strom Thurmond was a deep south Democrat. So was George Wallace. If these politicians were in their political prime today they would be conservatives. When I lived in South Carolina, I would run into a few "old timers" who said they still never got use to Thurmond being a Republican. But they quote.... "understood why he changed!"

This lingering effect from when the South was ruled by largely racist Democrats is the reason the Democrats still have high registration numbers today. My bet would be if you looked at the age demographics among whites in the South, it is mostly older people who are still registered Democrats. (even though they now vote GOP too) The younger Southerners are now registered Republican. People simply never changed their registration to reflect their voting patterns. Remember not everyone is as politically aware as the people on this message board. The majority of Americans don't think about their party registration in day to day life.

Voting patterns in the South are largely easy to predict. Which ever side or party is more apt to support racial equality is going to lose. When I was in school in South Carolina, my Political Science teacher (a very old white man) told me that race is the only thing the majority of residents in that state vote on. And he was and is right.

If you look at the voting patterns in this past election, Obama received the fewest number of white votes in the deep southern states. Even though from an economic standpoint southern whites were hurting more than their white northern rivals when it came to the economy. Also, more white southern and rural whites (percentage wise) are dying in Iraq when compared to their northern white counterparts. But none of that mattered. Race trumps all! Oklahoma was the only state in the country where Obama did not carry a single county. And we all know why.

This is how badly the Democratic Party is viewed in the deep south. During the 2004 Presidential election, George Bush actually received a higher percentage of the African American vote in Ohio, than John Kerry received from white voters in Mississippi!

The only way the Democrats are going to do well in the deep south in my life-time is through demographic changes. This is what happened in Virginia and North Carolina this past election. Northern whites with good educations moved to the South. They are more progressive when it comes to racial issues. They aren't still fighting the Civil War. (yes I'm serious) And that was the vote that turned NC and VA blue.

As long as there is one more white person than a black person in any deep south state, no Democrat will win. You are not going to defeat racism in the Southern voting booth. It has to die out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. Those who are not raised here have a very difficult time understanding the mindset of "appalachia"..
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 08:26 PM by K Gardner
one can poll until the cows come home and it's still not going to 'splain' the history of these people.

I was raised in Appalachia. My family on both sides born and raised in the mountains. I still live here. And I still don't understand.

The ones who do win elections here are playing to the basest instincts, and not to intellect or reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enuegii Donating Member (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. God, guns and good-ol' boys (racists/mouthbreathers)...
Never in hell will it change.
Obama can hand over a cool million to every single Alabamian and still 60% of them will continue to scream about "them damn Democrats!"
I've come to realize that it's a lost cause...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. It's about being Dems that are pro-guns and anti-unions. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. tennessee does not lean democratic....not one bit--bogus 'facts'
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 11:29 PM by spanone
i have no idea how these 'facts' are derived. tennessee is pathetically republican

oklahoma leans democrat?

kentucky leans democrat?

this is horseshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC