Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Financial Coup D'Etat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:57 AM
Original message
The Financial Coup D'Etat
Edited on Wed Feb-18-09 10:58 AM by Nikki Stone1
http://solari.com/blog/?p=2058



In the fall of 2001 I attended a private investment conference in London to give a paper, The Myth of the Rule of Law or How the Money Works: The Destruction of Hamilton Securities Group. The presentation documented my experience with a Washington-Wall Street partnership that had:

Engineered a fraudulent housing and debt bubble;
Illegally shifted vast amounts of capital out of the U.S.;
Used “privitization” as a form of piracy - a pretext to move government assets to private investors at below-market prices and then shift private liabilities back to government at no cost to the private liability holder.

Other presenters at the conference included distinguished reporters covering privatization in Eastern Europe and Russia. As the portraits of British ancestors stared down upon us, we listened to story after story of global privatization throughout the 1990s in the Americas, Europe, and Asia. Slowly, as the pieces fit together, we shared a horrifying epiphany: the banks, corporations and investors acting in each global region were the exact same players. They were a relatively small group that reappeared again and again in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Asia accompanied by the same well-known accounting firms and law firms.

Clearly, there was a global financial coup d’etat underway.....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Three recs and no comments?
Well, thanks for the recs anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. interesting knr ... another snip
The magnitude of what was happening was overwhelming. In the 1990’s, millions of people in Russia had woken up to find their bank accounts and pension funds simply gone – eradicated by a falling currency or stolen by mobsters who laundered money back into big New York Fed member banks for reinvestment to fuel the debt bubble.

Reports of politicians, government officials, academics, and intelligence agencies facilitating the racketeering and theft were compelling. One lawyer in Russia, living without electricity and growing food to prevent starvation, was quoted as saying, “We are being de-modernized.”

Several years earlier, I listened to three peasant women describe the War on Drugs in their respective countries: Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia. I asked them, “After they sweep you into camps, who gets your land and at what price?” My question opened a magic door. They poured out how the real economics worked on the War on Drugs, including the stealing of land and government contracts to build housing for the people who are displaced.

At one point, suspicious of my understanding of how this game worked, one of the women said, “You say you have never been to our countries, yet you understand exactly how the money works. How is this so?” I replied that I had served as Assistant Secretary of Housing at the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in the United States where I oversaw billions of government investment in US communities. Apparently, it worked the same way in their countries as it worked in mine.

I later found out that the government contractor leading the War on Drugs strategy for U.S. aid to Peru, Colombia and Bolivia was the same contractor in charge of knowledge management for HUD enforcement. This Washington-Wall Street game was a global game. The peasant women of Latin America were up against the same financial pirates and business model as the people in South Central Los Angeles, West Philadelphia, Baltimore and the South Bronx.

Later, courageous reporting by Naomi Klein and Greg Palast confirmed in detail that the privitization and economic warfare model I discussed in London had deep roots in Latin America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That bit about the Russian pensions was just too eerie. We're watching the same game plan.
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. They have it down pat.
Bankers, lawyers, military officers and politicians. Combine that with a few Trillion in pocket money and they can destroy a country, bleed it dry and be gone before you know what hit you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
43. Vampires, they are . . .
They have no nationality, no morals and no shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. You should follow the Stanford threads
Antigua is controlled by the Knights of Malta and this goes to the heart of their shadowy banking and drug empire.

It's going to get very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. Knights of Malta?
Sorry, I lost you there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. I guess you have not been reading my posts.
Go to my journal and browse around. I think you will get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaLittle Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
48. CORPORATISM BABY! When Will The General Population Wake Up? When It's TOOO Late!
Great Post... This is the kind of thing that John Russell has been fighting in his bid to get to Congress! "The Corporation" as described is the culprit and includes the mainstream media!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. I need some foil, quick!
Sounds like a NWO chapter to me.

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. this is an excellent essay....
Recommended. Some interesting comments posted after it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hey Professor Mike. What do you make of our CA budget debacle?
One Republican vote. One.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. it's crazy, though not unexpected....
Yeah, one vote. I do hope that when the excrement REALLY hits the fan, voters from the sea of red counties know who is responsible for this mess.

And I still think Howard Jarvis was one of the worst of the lot. Prop 13 is a slow time bomb that cannot be unarmed. The only way to fix it would be to repeal it and then replace it with a second amendment that maintains the good aspects-- protection for retired home owners-- and scraps the parts that are killing the state, like protecting commercial and corporate property from taxes. The dual face of Prop 13 makes that damned nearly impossible, though. Any campaign to repeal it will run smack up against republican ads depicting grandmothers living on the street. Anyone trying to fix Prop 13 will be pilloried as Snidely Whiplash.

And even if it could be repealed, corporations and their lackeys would fight tooth and nail against replacing it with something better. We could even end up with something worse-- the current budget stalemate proves that republicans will do ANYTHING to obstruct economic justice.

We live in interesting times!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. "protecting commercial and corporate property from taxes" Good ole Prop 13
They used the scare tactics of old people losing their homes to protect corporate pockets. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. The boys:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. I appreciate this blog..
...it is very insightful and spot on.

It's important that people who "don't get it" finally "get it."

However, most of us have known for quite a while that something is rotten in Denmark
and that we are being bamboozled--and the entire system will soon collapse.

We get it.

I'd like to know what in the hell we are supposed to do after the collapse? How
do we prepare and survive?

I get that their is a tsunami headed toward my forehead. Now...just tell me what
I need to do to keep myself and my family safe.

How do we outwit this thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I agree with your question....what do we do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
37. Read the Archives of CAF other articles - her suggestions is pull
everyone together locally, including your city/county boards. One person really can't survive on their own, but a group can. It happened during the Depression in the 1930s. Everyone came together. There were even local currencies at that time.

She was on the radio in 2004 saying that there was going to be a huge Housing Bubble and it was being orchestrated by the mafia (which one, I am not sure). She said then it could take down the global economy. I cried when I heard it - she had it nailed down, and it was scary. It is scary. Get to know your neighbors, republican or not. They may be your greatest asset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. plant a garden.
really, i have no idea. the tsunami has already hit, we're waiting for the die-off now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. LOL!
True...the tsunami has hit many. I think it's coming in wave after wave after wave--instead of one big hit. Don't you?

You never know if you're going to be next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is very unsettling.
To say the least.

K & R

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. So I reads a bit....
and check a few dark corners and sure enough under a rock I find a group called the "PORTAL alliance"...

http://www.subprimeblogger.com/the-portal-alliance-could-be-the-destruction-of-our-economy-and-we-dont-even-know-what-it-is/

Now I'm an economic dunce, but could a couple more educated DUers snoop around and tell me how almost every collapsing investment house got involved in this and what the hell it means? Looks like whatever it did was about the time the bottom was being pulled out beneath us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. well DUH!
it became obvious something very ominous was going on
during the clinton impeachment... but that still looked a little
bit "local" and "political" . It was a brilliant plan. Somebody dreamed
it up. A deep think tank somewhere. Brilliant But it didn't seem global.
Oh, the naivety of me, eh?

by 2002 it was becoming very obvious. By 2004 it was a clear criminal
enterprise on a vast scale, with a seriously frightening set of objectives
and capabilities, and no apparent way to stop it.

Fortunately there was just enough pushback to stop the machine. By June 2008 the
most pillaging and serious looting had ceased in anticipation of loosing the
US election. So now engage the shredders, warp speed! In the end all that was
left was an empty vault hanging open.

They're (institutions) still out there. Protecting themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. K & R! Don't forget to read part 2-Diversification!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's even better. Thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. there is so great reading over there.

I kept following the links in the story.

Thanks for the link to that site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. there is so much great reading over there.
Edited on Wed Feb-18-09 08:17 PM by Justpat
I kept following the links in the story.

Thanks for the link to that site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. You're welcome.
She's been in the thick of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick for you Nikki and for Catherine Austin Fitts. n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. K&R
Thanks for posting this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. Next step, break up the US for the mineral wealth and public lands!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes it's a plan all right
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NMu1mFao3w I've read somewhere about global divisions of power as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
28. The takeover of the US was just the start. It's clearly gone global.
Great thread with lots of interesting reading.

I'm now nauseous and won't be able to sleep.:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. Wowzer.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NM Independent Donating Member (794 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. WHO?!
"Slowly, as the pieces fit together, we shared a horrifying epiphany: the banks, corporations and investors acting in each global region were the exact same players. They were a relatively small group that reappeared again and again in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Asia accompanied by the same well-known accounting firms and law firms."

Well, if it's a small group of the same players, then WHY aren't they named?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justaregularperson Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. They are, you have to read the other parts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
41. Same group that carried out the Keating & Silverado S&L and First Republic Bank ripoffs. See this:
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/leveymg/365

SNIP

The S&L crisis was all about oil, junk bonds, and deregulation that allowed the two to mix. That volatile brew is still actively bubbling over,and taxpayers are still paying $30 billion annual installments toward the trillion dollar bailout.

Here's how you got stuck paying the bill, courtesy of the Bush family and John McCain.

In the mid-1980s, world oil prices plunged which set off a long series of bankruptcies and financial takeovers when overvalued Texas and southwestern land prices collapsed. The financial panic of 1988 also followed the “reform” of federal banking rules that had allowed bank managers to trade in risky new derivatives and junk bonds.

This tidal wave of bankruptcies in the oil patch created a huge buying opportunity for anyone with ready cash. The problem was, these were hard times on Wall Street after the sudden panic sell-off on October 1987. But, someone did step in once prices were sufficiently discounted. Huge bank holding companies scooped up looted banks and S&Ls (along with their land deeds and oil rights), bought out for pennies on the dollar after they went belly-up. The federal government even subsidized many of these purchases. The American taxpayer was left with an estimated $1 trillion bailout cost. The epicenters of this late 20th Century white collar crime wave were in Houston and Phoenix, home base for two highly ambitious GOP politicians. One was named George H.W. Bush, and the other John McCain, III.

McCain and BCCI, the Bush Bank

Before he was selected to as Ronald Reagan’s 1980 running mate, George H.W. Bush had a short and little-known career as an international banker. That effectively started in 1976, while Bush was still CIA Director, a post he held for part of the Nixon and Ford Administration. In the final months of the Ford presidency, Bush made a deal with the newly-appointed head of Saudi General Intelligence Directorate, Prince Turki al-Faisal. The two spy chiefs agreed the CIA would look the other way while the Saudis ran their own global operations. In exchange, the Saudis financed the sort of black ops that had been banned by the Democratic Congress after Watergate and the Church Committee hearings. The arrangement was called “The Safari Club” , and the funding mechanism for this was the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, “BCCI”. See, http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/7/8/146... ; http://www.saudiembassy.net/2006News/State...

Newly-elected President Jimmy Carter fired the CIA Director. In early 1977, Houston banker Joe Allbritton appointed Bush to direct his First International Bancshares (dba, First Interbank) and its London and Luxembourg affiliates. According to Kevin Phillips, Bush’s bank was among the first outposts in America for BCCI. http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-0... In the early 1980s, Allbritton followed G.H.W. to Washington, purchasing Riggs Bank, installing brother Jonathan Bush as a Director.

Riggs closed in 2004 after being fined $25 million dollars for violation of federal money laundering and anti-terrorism laws. Riggs had catered to high-end foreign customers and the diplomatic trade in Washington, as well as having “a relationship” with the CIA. http://www.slate.com/id/2112015 / After 9/11, the bank was found to have transferred money from Saudi Embassy accounts that ended up supporting two of the 9/11 hijackers, Flt. 77 leaders Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khaleed al-Midhar after their arrival in the U.S. See, http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/b...

Know Your Banking Customer: Salem Bin Laden

Meanwhile, back in Texas, First Interbank merged with Jim Baker’s Republic Bank, in which the Saudis had taken a stake with the 1978 purchase of the bank’ headquarters building by members of the Bin-Laden and bin-Mahfouz families. The merger of these two Texas banks several years later created the largest regional financial institution in the U.S. Infused with capital from Saudi Arabia, First RepublicBank went on a massive bargain buying binge in the Southwest oil patch. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2004/mar/3...

This Saudi-financed merger of the Bush bank with the Baker bank created the nation’s largest bank holding company, and soon the largest bank failure, resulting in a $1 billion tax-payer funded bailout in 1987. This was to become a pattern for the trillion dollar rip-off to come. See, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html...

McCain's Role in Covering Up the The Trillion Dollar Bank Heist

It’s been said that the American people didn’t become very angry about the S&L crisis because the explanations given for what caused it were too complicated for many to comprehend. That seems to have set a pattern for financial scandals to follow. Nobody dared tell the American public – although the 1992 Kerry Commission report came close -- that their financial system was being looted by a well-funded, highly-organized global criminal organization with ties to half a dozen of the world’s most powerful intelligence services, including elements of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. They didn't name CIA Headquarters, "The George H.W. Bush Intelligence Center" for nothing. See,
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/b...



Buried in all this muck is the thread running through all these financial scandals – from Keating to Silverado to First RepublicBank to BCCI to Enron -- has been corrupt management, corrupt officials, corrupt intelligence operatives, and corrupt auditors. See, http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/92jan/st...

As the group’s scams became more sophisticated and wide-ranging, the price tag for bail-outs escalated. The federal rescue of Neil Bush’ Silverado S&L cost the taxpayer $1.3 billion. The price tag for Charles Keating’s Lincoln Savings & Loan bailout eventually reached $2.6 billion. http://www.slate.com/id/1004633 BCCI was termed “the $20-billion-plus heist.” (Beatty, Jonathan; S.C. Gwynne. The Outlaw Bank: A Wild Ride Into the Secret Heart of BCCI Beard Books (1993)). Finally, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) estimated that Enron fleeced ratepayers of $30 billion, creating the 2001 California energy crisis. On November 15, 2005, FERC settled with Enron’s receivers for a mere $1.5 billion. http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/in...

The Keating S&L scandal was part of a now-familiar pattern of transnational commodities price-fixing, land grabs, stock-price rigging, fraudulent audits, financial panic, and public bailouts, all carried out by an overlapping cast of characters with ties to foreign and domestic intelligence agencies. Amidst the financial panic of 1986-88 that followed the drop of a barrel of oil from $39 to $13, many of these banks and S&Ls (and their land deeds and oil rights) were bought out for pennies on the dollar. More than a thousand deregulated financial institutions went belly up and were looted. Deregulation allowed crooked bank managers to cash in on the junk bond craze that was sweeping Wall Street. Banks and S&Ls issued unsecured notes and plots of land and traded them in circles with other institutions to ring up the notional value to support cash-out loans for themselves and their partners.

This is precisely the sort of round-robin games that Neil Bush, Director of Silverado S&L played with Charles Keating and his partners, Saudi European Investment Corp’s board and officers – Roger Tamraz, Tolat Othman, Abdullah Taha Bakhsh, Abbas Gokal -- along with other BCCI players. All told, the S&L scandal left the American taxpayer holding the tab for an estimated $1 trillion bailout. See, Steven Wilmsen: Silverado: Neil Bush and the Savings & Loan Scandal, p. 81; http://www.netmagic.net/~franklin/SS1.html ;
http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:IpskRJ... ;
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getc...

It was during this period that the Saudis and Gulf states leveraged their earnings from American bank acquisitions through junk-bond mills, and then moved on to the 1996 Chemical-Chase and Citi banks consolidations in New York. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html... Today, Prince Alaweed’s Kingdom Holdings owns a substantial and growing share of Citicorp, the largest bank in America, along with a portfolio of the nation’s largest financial, technology and media corporations. A similar process of slash and burn acquisition of the U.S. financial industry is now going on with the collapse of the U.S. mortgage and derivatives markets. See, http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/week... ; http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/11/business...

A major figure in the Keating S&L case was Carl Linder, known as the “father figure” to junk bond king Michael Milken, and the single largest purchaser of Milken’s junk bonds. http://www.motherjones.com/news/special_re...

“Lindner, a wealthy businessman from Cincinnati, Ohio owned the American Financial Corporation (AFC). In 1976, Keating bought a subsidiary of AFC called American Continental Homes from Lindner, which Keating later renamed American Continental Corporation (ACC). ACC embarked on several ambitious real estate development projects, mostly in Arizona and Colorado. To finance its activities, ACC set up its own in-house mortgage company and was a pioneer in creating the type of financial package and instrument known as the ‘mortgage-backed security.’” See, http://law.jrank.org/pages/3505/Charles-Ke...


To recap, the context of the Keating S&L scandal was manipulation of world oil prices following the 1979 Iranian revolution and a loosening of regulatory oversight that set off a wave of bank failures across the American oil patch. Into this mix enters BCCI’s global raiders and junk bond traders, who cash cow the giant bank holding companies and leverage their assets into a play to take over the American banking industry. Finally, to top it off, the Bush presidency and elements of U.S. intelligence engage in a massive cover up of these global financial mechanizations in an effort to protect their international partners. It’s in this context that one needs to re-examine the role of John McCain in the Keating S&L scandal. McCain has always been a conciliator and clean-up specialist – in the case of the Keating S&L, the purpose was to protect a group of junk bond salesmen and Arab bank raiders, but, most of all to shield the Bush wing of the CIA and corrupt lawmakers – and put an attractive, all-American face of “reform” on cleaning up the mess afterwards. This is precisely the coverup routine McCain repeated twenty years later in the Abramoff case.

McCain and Enron

Throughout his career, McCain has been an enthusiastic champion of financial industry deregulation as a member of the Senate Commerce Committee from 1997-2001 and 2003-2005. McCain voted, according to a Washington Post financial columnist, with his “campaign's general co-chairman and domestic policy adviser, former Texas senator Phil Gramm. The Politico's Lisa Lerer reports that not only did Gramm author the 1999 legislation that repealed Glass-Steagall, the New Deal law restricting the speculative activities of banks, but after Gramm left the Senate, he lobbied Congress on behalf of the Swiss bank UBS when the banking lobby wanted Congress to overturn state laws restricting predatory lending and the issuance of mortgages to prospective home owners who could not afford them.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte... McCain, like Gramm, has been a supporter of the “Enron Loophole” that allowed Amaranth Advisors hedge fund, a commodities futures trading company, to attempt in 2006 to corner the natural gas market, a criminal violation for which the fund was recently handed a $300 million fine. http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/051908a...

McCain also has a direct connection with Enron, having received money in campaign contributions from Ken Lay’s Death Star. "We're all tainted by the millions and millions of dollars that were contributed by Enron executives," John McCain told CBS' "Face the Nation" Sunday. McCain then acknowledged receiving $9,500 from Enron in two campaigns. http://www.time.com/time/business/article/... Gramm’s wife, Wendy, was on the Enron Board of Directors, and Gramm was the architect of much of the “reform” while he chaired the Senate Banking Committee, including a move to exempt electronic trading of electricity from regulatory oversight. According to Time Magazine, Gramm and his wife were at the forefront of many of the illicit practices that led to the firm’s massive ripoffs and ultimate collapse:

On Jan. 14, 1993, in the final days of the first Bush administration, Wendy Gramm – as chairwoman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission – pushed through a key regulatory exemption removing energy derivatives contracts and interest-rate swaps from federal oversight.

That was a major financial boon to Enron, where Wendy Gramm landed five weeks later as a member of the board of directors. She also became a member of the audit committee that signed off on another one of Enron’s fraudulent schemes, partnerships that hid the company’s growing debt.


McCain claims that his role in Keating was merely to help out a local constituent in dealing with Washington bank regulators. McCain, his current wife, and father-in-law were, in fact, Charles Keating’s business partners in a Phoenix shopping mall, received in excess of one hundred thousand dollars in campaign contributions from Keating, and accompanied Keating on his private jet to his private resort in the Bahamas on multiple occasions, gifts which McCain did not report until they were discovered. Yet, McCain, hand-picked as Barry Goldwater’s successor, got a slap on the wrist from the Senate Ethics Committee when this came out in the Keating-Five inquiry.

A second Senate panel wasn’t so sanguine. The 1992 Kerry Commission report concluded that the Keating affair was far more serious than a mere domestic banking scandal: “the financial dealings of BCCI directors with Charles Keating and several Keating affiliates and front-companies, includ(e) the possibility that BCCI related entities may have laundered funds for Keating to move them outside the United States.” http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/b... Out of the five Senators accused, only McCain and Glenn ever ran again for office, with McCain the sole survivor.

___
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #41
45. Connecting the dots...
All the dots go back to the Bushes and their dynasty that started in Ohio 100 years ago with an otherwise obscure man named Samuel Bush who aligned himself with the Rockefellers and promoted oligarchy under the guise of fascism as an ideal of federalism. His son wanted to overthrow the government in the 1930s and 70 years later his great-grandson did just that and turned the dream of oligarchy into reality.

The problem is it has turned into a disaster for everyone. The economy isn't collapsing. It has already collapsed. Book value as it's called has been replaced by actual value. And the money ain't there because it was never there to begin with. $1 billion on paper was backed by $1 million in actual assets. It was all illusion. And delusion.

Funny money. Which in the end isn't so funny after all. And now Congress is playing roulette with funny money as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Largely agree. Except, awful lot of real money got made and stashed in offshore accounts.
The federal government needs to declare war on those who ripped off America. Chase down these criminals and seize their assets, no matter where they are. Make this the highest priority of DHS and FBI. Use the NSA and CIA to locate those abroad, send in the 101st Airborne to carry out the arrests, if need be. Take down the entire organization.

These people are more dangerous than UBL and al-Qaeda - in fact, they created and financed UBL and al-Qaeda. Treat them as the terrorists they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Absolutely they did...
Edited on Thu Feb-19-09 12:10 PM by Baby Snooks
But the people you believe have the money don't. Even Carlyle lost enormous sums of money in the hedge funds as did most of these "private bank/investment" firms. It will probably never come out but I still believe Bernie Madoff lost most of the assets in the hedge funds, began liquidating equities which he had the legal right to do although he had the legal obligation to disclose it to the investors which he didn't, and kept losing it all. And I think someone set him up. He wiped out liberal, primarily Jewish, wealth. He was targeted the way Leona Helmsley was targeted. And no tin hat there. Even those who reviled her quietly suspected she was targeted and targeted because she was Jewish. Some resent the concentration of Jewish wealth. And the power it bestows on liberal causes. Connect the dots. But then someone may have targeted those who targeted Bernie Madoff. And one of those targets may have been Allen Stanford. Connect the dots.

The hedge funds are nothing more than bets at a roulette table. They lost, the house won. And kept the money. The problem is no one at this point really knows who the house is. Or who really has the money.

My money is on the Rothschilds. Still the most powerful family in the world. Who saw an opportunity, perhaps for some revenge as well as financial advantage, and went for it as they say.

Bad economies never serve the Rothschilds. So we will survive.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Carlyle isn't what it once was, nor are the Rothschilds.
Madoff and Helmsley made themselves easy targets, but neither of them are exactly Meyer Lansky. Stanford isn't really in the same league.

Hedge funds are real, and real people own them. Just ask George Soros and the Exchequer of the Currency.

Back to Madoff, Judge Ellis won't allow us to see his offshore accounts, so it's hard to say where it all got stashed. My guess would be much of it was as illusionary as the wealth "created" by options. Of the $50B allegedly missing, maybe ten-twenty percent ever really was held in the form of instruments could have been converted into cash. The rest was leverage. That's still a lot of money, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justaregularperson Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
31. WOW!!!! The motherload! A MUST read.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irish Girl Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
32. what is the mid 70's show, Captains and Kings?
what is Captains and Kings, a mid 70's show with Patti Duke? Has anyone seen it? In the comments, the author suggests the creator of this show was trying to warn us of the small group of players who appear over and over again, secretly involved in the coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #32
47. Concentration of wealth....
The premise is that wealth must be consolidated and controlled by a few in order to maintain a healthy economy. What we have seen is too much consolidation with too little control.

Everyone wanted to be a Rothschild. The Rothschilds are probably the only family left with any actual wealth. Everyone else's is on paper. Backed by very little at this point except the paper.

Bernie Madoff and Allen Stanford are just two of many who created wealth with nothing to back it up. Bernie Madoff lost most of it in the hedge funds. Allen Stanford seems to have just disappeared with most of it.

Both are reflections of the economic reality about to hit everyone. The money really ain't there. And never was. It was all on paper.

Funny money as they used to call it. Not worth the paper backing it up. And now the real money isn't worth the paper it's printed on.

The Rothschilds knew what was coming. They moved their primary investments into metals and diamonds. And according to rumor through the years have amassed an empire of trillions of dollars. Much of it in cash in Swiss banks. Just sitting there. Waiting for another Waterloo. Which most likely happened last fall. "Sell, sell, sell, the Rothschilds are selling." And probably are busy buying back. Buy low, sell high. And if you can cause a lot of others to sell high you can buy it all back low. Works for the Rotschilds anyway. Along with venture capitalism. They created venture capitalism. They actually owned about 80% of the assets of JP Morgan when he died. But they like to create wealth because of course that increases their wealth. So at some point there will be a new economy. Financed by the Rothschilds. Who at least know what they're doing. The Bushes never did. Neither did the Rockefellers or any of the other "captains and kings." They just knew how to steal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KnaveRupe Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
34. Too bad it's C.A.Fitts.
I went to post this on another forum where I regularly debate with RW tools, but first I did a quick check on Ms. Fitts.

Seems she has a little credibility problem stemming from some "aliens among us" statements.

That's too bad, because while what she says here may very well be true, I can't put this article out there in those types of forums without being ridiculed.

Which is, I'm sure, EXACTLY WHAT THE CABAL CONDUCTING THE COUP WANTS!!!

Seriously, this is pretty sensational stuff on its own, and when combined with some of her other statements can be too easily painted as paranoid ravings. Even though it all sounds perfectly legit to li'l ol' paranoid me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. She is absolutely nothing like that - where are you getting *that*?
She was the director of HUD during Pappy Bush years, and she started talking about the Black Ops money being taken out of her budget. The movie with Will Smith & Gene Hackman (what is the name?) is pretty much what happened to her after she left HUD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KnaveRupe Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Here.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0209/S00126.htm

In 1998, I was approached by John Peterson, head of the Arlington Institute, a small high quality military think tank in Washington, DC. I had gotten to know John through Global Business Network and had been impressed by his intelligence, effectiveness and compassion. John asked me to help him with a high level strategic plan Arlington was planning to undertake for the Undersecretary of the Navy.

At the time I was the target of an intense smear campaign that would lead the normal person to assume that I would be in jail shortly or worse. John explained that the Navy understood that it was all politics ---- they did not care.

I met with a group of high level people in the military in the process --- including the Undersecretary. According to John, the purpose of the plan --- discussed in front of several military or retired military officers and former government officials--- was to help the Navy adjust their operations for a world in which it was commonly known that aliens exist and live among us.

When John explained this purpose to me, I explained that I did not know that aliens existed and lived among us. John asked me if I would like to meet some aliens. For the only time in my life, I declined an opportunity to learn about something important. I was concerned that my efforts with Arlington could boomerang and be connected with the smear campaign and the effects that I was managing. I regret that decision. At John's suggestion I started to read books on the topic and read about 25 books over the next year on the alien question, the black budget, and alien technology.

...

To cut a series of additional long stories short, when I talk with my few sources from the military and intelligence community, I hear the same themes:

1. Aliens exist and live among us;

2. In part for this reason as well the accumulated investment over the last 50 years, the technology we have access to through the black budget is far more advanced than is commonly understood;

3. The black budget/slush fund construct was created to deal with this issue, which is why reasonable people thought selling drugs to the children who were US citizens was the better of several options --- including the option of telling the American public the truth and funding the expenses on budget.


Like I said - it doesn't matter whether every word she says is true. I can't cite her without risking someone throwing this in my face. It doesn't speak to her ACTUAL credibility, but to her PERCEIVED credibility to any target audience whom I might need to convince.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Christa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
35. K & Highly recommended nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
36. The piece lacks eveidence
This article was posted some time ago in the Econ section. It lacks specific facts to back up the theory and Fitts admits it. That doesn't mean it's not true and I think she is courageous in her attempts to analyze the situation "outside the box."

Saying the money went to Asia just doesn't cut it. If the money went to Asia in 1997 it was just as quickly lost in the 1998-99 Asian meltdown. So where did it go?

And where did the money go now?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. That is the big question - who has all of this money? Where is it parked?
You can't just *hide* trillions of dollars and not have it show up somewhere. http://deepcapture.com click on the Patrick Byrne link - he names some names there. He too points to the Russian mob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. The money is mixed in with "legitimate" sovereign wealth funds and oil company accounts.
The "they" are all quite out in the open. They're large holders of major global banks, such as HSBC, Citicorp, UBS, BNP-Paribas. They control these institutions and big public corporations through proxies, such as Prince al-Aweed. This equity position makes them vulnerable to the downside of global economics, but they cover their positions. They make their real money by speculation and bankrolling large hedge funds, and move in after the takedown of national economies to buy up assets at fire sale discounts. There is, of course, a Russian-Israeli-Turkish Mafiyya element, but they don't hold the First-Tier equity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
51. Where do you think it was parked?
Edited on Thu Feb-19-09 12:26 PM by Baby Snooks
The Rothschilds learned during World War II that the only safe place to keep your money is in Switzerland. That's where the money is. Hidden behind mazes of corporate identities. Most of it probably connected to the Rothschilds. Who still own major interests in our banks. Just hidden behind mazes of corporate identities.

Interesting that someone brought up the analogy of "Captains and Kings" because at this point it looks like someone sank the ships and stole the thrones.

The Rotschilds created the "secret societies" to control the concentration of wealth. The problem is too many wanted to be Rothschilds. So the wannabes have been disposed of along with their ships and their thrones. To be replaced by new ones.

Theirs is a world that didn't welcome the Bushes and the Bakers and the Candlestickmakers. It certainly didn't welcome the Ken Lays and Allen Stanfords. Who of course served the Bushes and the Bakers and the Candlestickmakers. And their military-industrial complex which formed the foundation of their oligarchy. Which threatened the economic stability of the Rothschilds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
42. clearly for those living in reality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. Thanks!
Did you give me a heart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC