Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A concern about states turning down all or part of the stimulus funds.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:10 AM
Original message
A concern about states turning down all or part of the stimulus funds.
Will their actions cause the programs to be less effective? And if so, will this give them ammo in the next campaign cycle?

Or will it just make them look like bigger idiots than they are and cause them to be thrown out on their sorry asses? (Hint: I like this outcome best!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, no, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's what I was thinking...
I think their "no" gives Dems. more ammo to use against them for putting their party meme before the needs of their constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. In my state, Jindal is playing with fire if he does turn down the money.
I'm counting on NO Mayor Nagin making a big issue out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. How gullible are Americans to corporate propaganda?
:scared:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm guessing that the money would just be redistributed to other states
I'm assuming that's what the law says, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:19 AM
Original message
No stimulus for red states?
Works for me. Let them turn it down; more for the reality-based part of the country. It's a politically very risky move for them, in all seriousness: Palin has said Obama should veto the stimulus--but will she turn down the money? She costs her state an estimated 8,000 jobs if she does. How many Alaskans could use a decent-paying job right now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. States are hurting especially those now being Governed by Republicans
Those states will only go from bad to worse without a Capital injection of some sort. There are going to be very few "earmarks" allowed in the General budget Bill and especially for Republicans. I don't believe any will refuse the Federal aid. There are already reports of jobs being saved because planned layoffs are now being shelved due to expected Stimulus funds soon to be coming. There is no way this amount of direct spending can not help our situation at least some..People are starting top scramble already to get in on it..Me included..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. they aren't going to turn down that money. period.
that would be a death sentence for their political career i think. I mean, if you saw pawlenty last night trying to twist to conform to a logic that makes it perfectly reasonable that a governor that opposed the bill would take the money anyway. it boggles the mind!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. oh, and one could argue that if they did turn down the money
it would provide proof of the effect of the stimulus bill if states that took the money see a turn around and ones that didn't continue to struggle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC