Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sanford Says “No” To Stimulus Funds? Not Yet …

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:54 AM
Original message
Sanford Says “No” To Stimulus Funds? Not Yet …

Making good on his rhetoric of the past few weeks, S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford has said “thanks but no thanks” to billions of taxpayer dollars slated to come to South Carolina as part of the federal government’s “economic stimulus” plan.

Or has he?

MSNBC reported on national TV this morning that Sanford had sent out a press release saying South Carolina would not be requesting any of the money associated with the $787 billion bureaucratic bailout.

Sanford’s office says that’s not true … at least not yet.

“Honestly? We’re still looking at the bill to see what’s in it and what we could potentially say ‘yes’ and ‘no’ to,” said Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer. “No decisions have been made yet.”

Whatever position Sanford takes, it’s extremely unlikely that he can actually block any of this money from coming to the Palmetto State, as Democrats in Congress structured the massive boondoggle to be incredibly resistant to, well, him.

Specifically, S.C. Rep. Jim Clyburn inserted a provision in the bill that would enable state legislatures to formally request the bailout money in the event a governor declined to do so.

more:http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/18/sanford-says-no-to-stimulus-funds-not-yet/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. What do the people of South Carolina think of being cut out of the Recovery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Exactly, It would seem the Governor does not have the citizenry's best interests at heart.
Perhaps there's no job loss or home foreclosure issues in South Carolina? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'm just waiting to see what the idiot does.
People here vote against their interests too much. They only hear one side. However, when they get fed up, they tend to act quickly. Remember Fort Sumter.
They followed Gen. Robert E. Lee, but following Hoover-Sanford too far as the economy sinks may be a stretch. This is one Lost Cause they may not want to try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. What's that about?
The Republicans WANT the money for SC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hmm, using the term "massive boondoggle" to describe the stimulus sounds a little...RW to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a moot point.
From the article:

Whatever position Sanford takes, it’s extremely unlikely that he can actually block any of this money from coming to the Palmetto State, as Democrats in Congress structured the massive boondoggle to be incredibly resistant to, well, him.

Specifically, S.C. Rep. Jim Clyburn inserted a provision in the bill that would enable state legislatures to formally request the bailout money in the event a governor declined to do so.

Known as the “Mark Sanford amendment,” it could very well set up another showdown between Sanford and his GOP antagonists in the legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Their goal is to claim that they didn't need the stimulus when their state economy recovers.
Seems like a HUGE risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC